Coltart warns devolution failing local authorities

Speaking
at
a
National
Residents’
Summit
in
Bulawayo
on
Thursday,
hosted
by
the
Bulawayo
Progressive
Residents
Association
(BPRA),
Cllr
Coltart
said
national
policies
and
laws
were
running
contrary
to
the
principle
of
devolution
enshrined
in
the
constitution.

“Although
we
have
strong
constitutional
provisions
that
should
promote
devolution,
the
reality
on
the
ground
is
that
there
are
measures
in
place
which
are
accosted
to
devolution,”
he
said.

He
cited
road
maintenance
as
one
of
the
areas
affected,
saying
funds
previously
allocated
to
councils
through
vehicle
licence
fees
were
now
controlled
by
the
Zimbabwe
National
Road
Administration
(ZINARA).

“That
money
now
goes
to
ZINARA
and
we
literally
have
to
beg
to
get
some
of
our
money
back
to
repair
roads.
That
is
contrary
to
the
principle
of
devolution,”
he
added.

The
mayor
also
criticised
the
government’s
takeover
of
Bulawayo’s
water
infrastructure.

“Ratepayers
of
this
city
over
decades
built
our
own
dams
and
our
own
water
infrastructure.
But
those
dams
were
unilaterally
taken
over
by
the
Zimbabwe
National
Water
Authority
(ZINWA)
decades
ago
and
we
now
have
to
buy
our
own
water
back,”
he
said.

Cllr
Coltart
further
accused
central
government
of
directing
how
devolution
funds
should
be
spent,
citing
the
purchase
of
fire
engines
from
Belarus
at
US$400,000
each.

“We
could
have
got
top-of-the-range
Mercedes
Benz
or
Volvo
fire
engines
for
two-thirds
the
price.
It
is
another
example
of
how
we
pay
lip
service
to
the
principle
of
devolution,”
he
said.

The
mayor
also
raised
alarm
over
Bulawayo’s
worsening
water
crisis,
with
the
city
currently
on
a
130-hour
water
shedding
schedule.
Some
residents
report
receiving
water
only
once
every
two
or
three
weeks.

“Our
water
structure
is
groaning.
It
is
over
40
years
old
and
way
beyond
its
economic
lifespan.
Ncema
Dam’s
water
treatment
works,
built
in
the
1940s,
are
in
dire
need
of
complete
rehabilitation,”
he
said.

Cllr
Coltart
warned
that
without
urgent
investment
in
new
dams
and
infrastructure,
Bulawayo’s
water,
sanitation
and
hygiene
systems
would
remain
in
a
“critical
state.”

Mnangagwa Has No Power To Reassign Politburo Posts, Says Advocate Mpofu

According
to
Mpofu,
Mutsvangwa’s
title
as
“Secretary
for
Information
and
Publicity
and
Party
Spokesperson”
does
not
exist
in
the
ZANU
PF
Constitution,
so
a
letter
signed
under
that
title
carries
no
legal
effect.

He
argued
that
the
ZANU
PF
Constitution
does
not
give
the
First
Secretary
unilateral
power
to
reassign
Politburo
positions
outside
of
Congress.
Here
is
what
Advocate
Mpofu
said:

“I
have
reviewed
the
ZANU
PF
Constitution
(both
the
2014
and
2022
versions)
thoroughly
and
can
state
the
following
with
authority:

“1.
The
letter
from
Chris
Mutsvangwa
purporting
to
announce
changes
to
the
ZANU
PF
Politburo
is
invalid.
It
claims
the
decision
to
relieve
Obert
Mpofu
of
his
office
as
ZANU
PF
Secretary-General
was
taken
under
Article
9,
sections
65
and
67.
Article
9
concerns
Politburo
functions
generally
and
does
not
confer
authority
for
the
First
Secretary
to
reassign
office-holders.
Section
65
addresses
the
functions
of
the
Secretary
for
Economic
Development
and
Empowerment;
section
67
addresses
the
functions
of
the
Secretary
for
Healthcare
of
the
Child
and
the
Elderley.
Neither
provision
authorizes
the
personnel
change
Mutsvangwa
communicates.
For
that
reason,
the
letter
does
not
effect
a
lawful
change
of
office.

“2.
Article
9,
section
63
establishes
the
office
of
Secretary
for
Media,
Information
and
Publicity.
Mutsvangwa’s
letter
is
signed
as
“Secretary
for
Information
and
Publicity
and
Party
Spokesperson.”
That
composite
title,
used
to
arrogate
spokesperson
authority,
does
not
exist
in
the
Constitution.
A
communication
signed
by
a
non‑existent
constitutional
office-holder
has
no
legal
effect.

“3.
Even
if
Mutsvangwa’s
title
were
a
typographical
error,
the
office
created
under
section
63
is
not
the
designated
spokesperson
of
the
First
Secretary.
Therefore
the
letter
does
not
purport
to
communicate
the
authoritative
position
of
the
First
Secretary.
There
is
no
letter
in
existence
which
purports
to
have
been
written
by
the
ZANU
PF
First
Secretary.

“4.
Nothing
in
the
ZANU
PF
Constitution
vests
the
First
Secretary
with
the
unilateral
power
to
make
the
reassignments
announced.
Section
54
is
clear
on
this
as
it
sets
out
the
full
remit
of
his
powers.
In
fact,
in
terms
of
section
49
the
power
to
appoint
heads
is
exercised
during
Congress
and
not
anytime
thereafter.
A
power
not
enshrined
in
the
Constitution
cannot
lawfully
be
exercised.

“Accordingly,
if
the
position
is
maintained
that
the
First
Secretary
lacks
authority
to
reassign
Mpofu
et
al,
and
that
position
is
not
accepted,
a
dispute
arises
mandating
resolution.
In
the
meantime,
it’s
back
to
original
settings.

“Whilst
I’ve
cited
provisions
from
the
2022
version,
the
conclusion
to
be
retained
is
maintained
even
if
we
use
the
2014
version.”

Obert Mpofu digs in amid claims Mnangagwa reshuffle legally dubious

HARARE

Zanu
PF
is
locked
in
a
bruising
internal
power
struggle
after
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa’s
attempt
to
reshuffle
the
party’s
leadership
triggered
open
defiance
from
one
of
his
most
senior
officials.

On
Tuesday,
party
spokesman
Christopher
Mutsvangwa
announced
that
Obert
Mpofu,
the
long-serving
secretary
general,
had
been
moved
to
a
lesser
role
as
secretary
for
information
communication
technology,
with
Jacob
Mudenda,
the
Speaker
of
Parliament,
taking
over
as
secretary
general.
But
within
48
hours,
it
was
evident
that
the
change
was
not
being
accepted
quietly.

On
Thursday,
Mudenda
wrote
a
letter
to
Chief
Secretary
to
the
President
and
Cabinet
Martin
Rushwaya,
notifying
him
that
the
late
comedian
and
radio
personality
Babongile
Sikhonjwa
had
been
accorded
a
state-assisted
funeral.

On
the
same
day,
Mpofu
countered
with
his
own
letter

complete
with
a
Zanu
PF
headquarters
date
stamp
of
September
25,
2025

informing
Rushwaya
that
the
late
John
Gowa
had
been
declared
a
liberation
hero
and
would
be
buried
in
Mt
Darwin.

Mpofu
signed
off
the
correspondence
in
his
old
title
as
“secretary
general,”
openly
ignoring
the
announcement
that
he
had
been
stripped
of
the
role.

The
spectacle
of
duelling
letters
has
laid
bare
the
scale
of
the
rift
inside
Zanu
PF,
raising
questions
over
who
truly
controls
the
party
machinery.
The
secretary
general’s
office
is
one
of
the
most
powerful
in
the
ruling
party,
responsible
for
the
day-to-day
running
of
its
structures,
and
Mpofu’s
refusal
to
step
aside
signals
that
a
full-blown
showdown
is
brewing.

Party
insiders
say
Mpofu,
a
close
ally
of
vice
president
Constantino
Chiwenga,
is
under
pressure
from
within
their
camp
to
dig
in.
Chiwenga’s
position
as
front
runner
to
succeed
Mnangagwa,
whose
term
expires
in
2028,
is
being
threatened
by
a
push
by
the
president’s
loyalists
to
extend
his
term
beyond
constitutional
limits.

The
standoff
has
been
further
inflamed
by
a
legal
opinion
from
top
lawyer
Advocate
Thabani
Mpofu,
who
insists
that
the
reshuffle
was
unconstitutional.
In
a
written
analysis
of
the
Zanu
PF
constitution,
Mpofu
argued
that
the
provisions
cited
in
Mutsvangwa’s
announcement
do
not
give
the
president
or
the
spokesman
the
authority
to
reassign
politburo
members.

He
said
the
title
used
by
Mutsvangwa

“Secretary
for
Information
and
Publicity
and
Party
Spokesperson”

does
not
even
exist
in
the
party
constitution,
and
therefore
any
communication
bearing
it
has
“no
legal
effect.”

Advocate
Mpofu
went
further,
stressing
that
nothing
in
the
party’s
governing
document
empowers
the
first
secretary
(president)
to
make
unilateral
changes
to
key
offices
outside
a
congress.

“A
power
not
enshrined
in
the
constitution
cannot
lawfully
be
exercised,”
he
wrote,
adding
that
until
the
matter
is
properly
resolved,
“it’s
back
to
original
settings.”

The
dispute
risks
paralysing
basic
administrative
functions
of
the
party.
With
both
Mudenda
and
Mpofu
issuing
official-looking
communications
to
government
departments,
there
is
confusion
over
whose
directives
to
follow.

The
fight
for
the
control
of
the
secretary
general’s
office
could
determine
which
faction
sets
the
agenda
as
the
party
heads
towards
a
turbulent
future.
The
party
will
hold
its
annual
conference
from
October
13
to
18.

Innscor turnover tops US$1 billion on strong demand across portfolio

HARARE

Innscor
Africa
Limited
has
reported
a
surge
in
annual
turnover
to
more
than
US$1
billion,
powered
by
strong
demand
across
its
food,
beverages
and
light
manufacturing
businesses,
as
the
group
consolidated
gains
from
years
of
expansion.

The
diversified
conglomerate,
which
owns
household
brands
such
as
National
Foods,
Baker’s
Inn,
Colcom
and
Irvine’s,
said
revenue
for
the
year
to
June
30,
2025
climbed
19
percent
to
US$1.086
billion,
up
from
US$910
million
in
the
prior
year.

Profit
before
tax
rose
to
US$68.1
million
from
US$65.2
million,
while
attributable
profit
to
shareholders
increased
to
US$41
million,
translating
to
headline
earnings
per
share
of
7.25
US
cents,
12
percent
higher
than
last
year.

Cash
generated
from
operations
rose
nearly
20
percent
to
US$104
million,
giving
the
group
headroom
to
plough
US$73.9
million
into
capital
expenditure
and
US$14.3
million
into
share
buy-backs.
Total
shareholders’
equity
closed
the
year
at
US$469
million,
with
net
gearing
kept
low
at
just
over
10
percent.

Chairman
Addington
Chinake
described
the
performance
as
“pleasing,”
noting
that
relative
stability
in
the
economy
since
late
2024
had
allowed
Innscor
to
optimise
pricing
and
unlock
efficiencies
across
its
operations.

“The
group
delivered
encouraging
volume
growth
across
its
core
segments.
Our
investments
in
new
capacity,
innovation
and
distribution
are
now
yielding
returns,
while
strong
free
cash
generation
allows
us
to
continue
expanding,”
Chinake
said.

The
Mill-Bake
unit
was
a
standout
performer,
with
Baker’s
Inn
boosting
bread
sales
by
12
percent
after
commissioning
a
new
automated
production
line
in
Harare.
National
Foods
also
expanded
volumes
by
18
percent,
led
by
strong
demand
in
flour,
maize
meal
and
snacks.

In
the
protein
segment,
Colcom
registered
a
25
percent
jump
in
fresh
pork
sales,
while
Irvine’s
lifted
table
egg
and
poultry
volumes.
Beverages
and
light
manufacturing
benefited
from
new
capacity
at
Prodairy
and
Buffalo
Brewing,
although
Probottlers
was
hit
by
the
government’s
Sugar
Tax,
which
has
raised
costs
and
dampened
demand
for
cordials
and
soft
drinks.

Despite
the
positive
momentum,
Innscor
highlighted
challenges,
including
lingering
disputes
with
the
Zimbabwe
Revenue
Authority
over
historical
tax
assessments,
and
a
mounting
burden
of
regulatory
levies.
The
group
said
it
had
already
remitted
over
US$10
million
in
Sugar
Tax
since
its
introduction
last
year.

Directors
declared
a
final
dividend
of
1.5
US
cents
per
share,
bringing
the
total
payout
for
the
year
to
2.95
US
cents

up
11
percent
from
last
year.
Payment
will
be
made
in
early
November.

Looking
ahead,
Innscor
said
it
was
entering
“an
exciting
phase,”
with
recently
completed
expansion
projects,
including
new
bakeries,
stockfeed
plants
and
a
fertiliser
granulation
facility,
now
contributing
to
output.

The
group
will
also
roll
out
a
pipeline
of
solar
energy
projects
and
continue
to
drive
contract
farming
through
its
“AGrowth”
platform.

In
2014,
Innscor
became
the
first
Zimbabwean
company
to
pull
in
over
US$1
billion
in
revenue.
A
year
later,
it
unbundled,
spinning
off
Simbisa
and
Axia
as
stand-alone
businesses.
Fast-forward
to
2025,
and
the
company
is
back
over
the
billion
mark.

US fraud convict nabbed in Harare over US$580k property ‘theft’

HARARE

A
Zimbabwean
man
once
jailed
for
tax
fraud
in
the
United
States
was
arrested
at
the
Robert
Gabriel
Mugabe
International
Airport
on
September
24
accused
of
fraudulently
transferring
ownership
of
a
prime
property
to
his
name.

On
Friday,
Elijah
Meskano,
52,
appeared
before
Harare
magistrate
Marewanazvo
Gofa
on
fraud
charges
and
was
granted
US$200
bail.

He
was
arrested
while
allegedly
attempting
to
flee
the
country,
prosecutors
said.

Maria
Mafunga,
41,
of
Gletwyn,
and
a
co-director
of
Deluxe
International
School
in
Ruwa
accuses
Meskano
of
illegally
transferring
ownership
of
her
Damofalls
stand
and
a
triple-storey
mansion
she
built
over
several
years.

The
National
Prosecuting
Authority
says
Mafunga
legally
purchased
part
of
stand
829,
measuring
2,916
square
metres,
in
February
2017
from
Brighton
Ushendibaba,
who
had
originally
acquired
the
land
from
Divine
Homes
land
developers.

“Over
time,
she
constructed
a
luxury
home
valued
at
US$580,000,
paying
all
permits
and
costs
under
the
developer’s
account,”
the
NPA
said.

That
same
year,
Meskano
purchased
the
remaining
three
subdivisions
of
the
original
property,
measuring
6,084
square
metres.
Prosecutors
allege
that
between
2017
and
2022,
Mafunga
peacefully
developed
her
portion
without
dispute.

But
in
August
this
year,
Meskano
is
said
to
have
fraudulently
altered
ownership
records,
changing
registration
from
Ross
Farm,
the
original
holder
of
the
land,
to
himself
and
his
wife,
Rudo,
without
Mafunga’s
knowledge
or
consent.

The
fraud
only
came
to
light
in
September
when
Mafunga
received
Harare
City
Council
bills
reflecting
Elijah
and
Rudo
Meskano
as
the
registered
owners
of
the
property.
Alarmed,
she
reported
the
matter
to
police.

Authorities
then
moved
quickly
after
receiving
information
that
Meskano
was
preparing
to
leave
Zimbabwe.
He
was
intercepted
at
the
airport
and
taken
into
custody.

This
is
not
the
first
time
Meskano
has
faced
fraud
charges.
In
2013,
while
living
in
Texas,
he
pleaded
guilty
in
a
Dallas
federal
court
to
conspiracy
to
steal
public
funds
in
connection
with
a
large-scale
tax
refund
fraud
scheme.

Court
records
from
the
U.S.
show
that
Meskano
and
his
roommate,
Cephas
Msipa,
electronically
filed
192
fraudulent
tax
returns
between
2011
and
2012,
using
stolen
identities
and
false
income
data.

They
directed
the
Internal
Revenue
Service
(IRS)
to
deposit
refunds
into
multiple
bank
accounts
they
had
opened
under
false
names.

Meskano
was
sentenced
to
45
months
in
federal
prison
and
ordered
to
repay
about
US$52,000,
while
his
co-conspirator
was
ordered
to
pay
more
than
US$118,000.

The
U.S.
Attorney
at
the
time,
Sarah
R.
Saldaña,
described
the
scam
as
“a
deliberate
theft
of
taxpayer
money.”

Kimmel Is Back! – See Also – Above the Law

Sinclair
&
Nexstar
Have
Backed
Down
On
Kimmel:
But
they
planned
to
replace
him
with
new
programming.
Clarence
Thomas
Doesn’t
Give
A
Damn
About
American
Tradition:
Just
read
his
take
on
stare
decisis.
Another
Law
School
Makes
Being
AI
Savvy
Mandatory:
Mississippi
College
School
of
Law
is
on
the
cutting
edge!
Take
The
Time
To
Type
It
Out:
We’d
prefer
Times
New
Roman
to
your
John
Hancock.

These Are Not The Metaphors You’re Looking For – Above the Law



Ed.
Note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


A
panel
of
Florida
judges
recently
cautioned
trial
judges
for
straying
away
from
standard
jury
instructions
by
using
attenuated
metaphors.
This
includes
invoking
fiction
to
help
make
points
about
reasonable
doubt
and
the
presumption
of
innocence.
Which
fictional
universes
did
a
trial
court
judge
invoke
to
help
explain
these
concepts?


Hint:
The
universes
range
from
magical
to
highly
technically
advanced.



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

The Truth About Medical Debt and Credit Reporting: Three Things To Know – MedCity News

Medical
debt
is
unfortunately
synonymous
with
healthcare
in
the
United
States.
Approximately

41%
of
Americans
have
debt
for
medical
or
dental
bills


meaning
they
are
currently
owing
a
bill,
being
contacted
by
a
collection
agency
or
actively
paying
off
past
balances.
Furthermore,
an
April
2024

report

from
the
Consumer
Federal
Protection
Bureau
(CFPB)
found
that
15
million
Americans
had
medical
bills
on
their
credit
reports,
accounting
for
a
whopping
$49
million
worth
of
outstanding
debt. 

As
2025
brought
in
a
new
administration
at
the
federal
level,
it
also
brought
with
it
new
changes
in
regards
to
various
facets
of
healthcare,
including
you
guessed
it

medical
debt
reporting.
In
January
2025,
thanks
to
Biden-era
rulings,
the
CFPB
finalized
a

rule

to
free
Americans
from
the
weight
of
medical
debt
on
existing
credit
reports.
Lenders
no
longer
had
access
to
this
historic
data
in
credit
decisions,
including
“coding”
or
contextual
data

unless
exceptions
applied. 

Fast
forward
to
July
2025,
a
federal
judge
in
Texas

overruled

the
decision
nationally,
claiming
that
the
former
administration’s
policy
was
in
violation
of
the
Federal
Credit
Reporting
Act
(FCRA).
As
someone
who
has
spent
the
better
part
of
30
years
promoting
healthcare
financial
wellness,
healthcare
financial
education
and
patient
advocacy,
I
am
passionate
about
breaking
down
what
this
ruling
means
for
the
millions
of
Americans
who
currently
have
or
might
one
day
have
medical
debt.


Takeaway
#1:
There
have
been
no
changes
to
medical
debt
reporting.

First
and
foremost,
consumers
and
providers
alike
should
know
this

nothing
has
changed
with
medical
debt
reporting
on
a
Federal
Level.
There
was
not
a
ban
as
the
CFPB
led
us
to
believe
on
1/7/25;
it
was
an
announcement
of
a
final
rule
that
never
took
effect.
The
default
federal
standard
per
the
Credit
Reporting
Agencies
and
FCRA
still
governs.
Medical
debts
over
$500
are
allowed
to
be
reported
on
a
credit
report
if
properly
coded
and
it’s
been
365
days
following
the
first
collection
notice.
This
gives
consumers
grace
and
time
to
work
with
the
collection
agency. 


Fifteen
states

provide
consumer
protections,
including
California,
New
York
and
most
recently
Delaware.
Additionally,
credit
bureaus
such
as
Equifax,
Experian
and
TransUnion
have
their
own
set
of
consumer
provisions,
including:
removal
of
reporting
on
paid
medical
collections,
not
reporting
on
medical
debt
under
$500
and
requirement
of
a
year-long
waiting
period
before
reporting
unpaid
medical
bills.
However
at
the
federal
level
the
rule
set
in
place
by
the
previous
administration
earlier
this
year
is
effectively
dead.


Takeaway
#2:
Hospitals
can
still
notify
consumers
of
accounts
and
collect.

In
my
opinion,
the
media
paints
a
somewhat
dreary
picture
of
the
impact
of
what
medical
debt
reporting
on
credit
checks
really
is.
Headlines
often
hype
up
the
fact
that
medical
debt
reporting
is
unfair
to
consumers,
and
throw
around
words
like
“misleading,”
“harmful,”
and
“outdated.”
I’d
like
to
present
an
alternative
point
of
view. 

I
believe
medical
debt
reporting
offers
hospitals
and
those
in
collection
agencies
a
powerful
tool

leverage.
Healthcare
is
the
only
industry
in
the
United
States
where
a
consumer
can
walk
into
a
place
of
service
and
receive
something
of
value
without
having
to
pay
either
before
or
after
the
service
is
done.
These
services
are
critical
in
nature
and
can
be
urgent
or
emergent.
Given
the
never-ending
reductions
in
payments
from
federal
programs
such
as
Medicare
and
Medicaid
and
the
increasing
impact
of
patient
balances
on
the
hospital’s
bottom-line,
hospitals
are
left
to
operate
at
a
deficit,
and
guess
what?
Patient
care
may
suffer
due
to
the
lack
of
patient
payments
and
monetary
resources.

Medical
debt
reporting
isn’t
just
about
lenders
calculating
risk.
It’s
about
hospitals
having
the
opportunity
to
encourage
patient
payment,
reduce
bad
debt
and
ultimately
maintain
financial
independence. 

In
short,
hospitals
need
to:


  1. Leverage
    ways
    to
    bring
    cash
    in
    the
    door


    Point
    of
    service
    collections
    help
    to
    capture
    patient
    balances
    early
    in
    the
    revenue
    cycle.
    Reporting
    medical
    debt
    gives
    hospitals
    and
    collections
    companies
    powerful
    leverage
    on
    the
    back
    end
    of
    the
    revenue
    cycle. 
    It
    notifies
    patients
    of
    outstanding
    accounts
    and
    provides
    incentives
    for
    timely
    payment. 

  2. Review
    financial
    and
    payment
    policies

    With
    8-12%
    of
    overall
    revenue
    coming
    from
    patient
    balances,
    hospitals
    should
    review,
    update
    and
    promote
    their
    payment
    policies
    to
    ensure
    patients
    are
    aware
    of
    how
    to
    pay
    their
    accounts
    and
    options
    to
    resolve
    outstanding
    balances. 

  3. Utilize
    financial
    counseling
    efforts

    Hospitals
    with
    higher
    patient
    balances
    should
    use
    financial
    counseling
    efforts
    to
    help
    patients
    identify
    possible
    eligibility
    for
    financial
    assistance,
    Medicaid
    or
    other
    hospital-based
    assistance/discount
    programs.
    Additionally,
    Financial
    Counselors
    can
    set
    payment
    plans
    with
    patients
    early
    in
    the
    process. 

  4. Outsource
    self-pay
    collections
    .
    This
    might
    sound
    like
    an
    oxymoron,
    but
    hospitals
    still
    benefit
    financially
    from
    any
    recovered
    payments
    (even
    those
    collected
    from
    third-party
    agencies).
    With
    staffing
    costs
    at
    a
    premium
    and
    the
    lack
    of
    technology
    to
    push
    wide-spread
    outreach
    to
    patients,
    utilizing
    a
    first-
    or
    third-party
    agency
    provides
    a
    way
    for
    hospitals
    to
    focus
    on
    the
    care
    they
    provide
    to
    patients
    and
    other
    billing
    matters.
    They
    manage
    the
    agency
    and
    allow
    their
    agency
    partner
    to
    drive
    collections.
    The
    cost
    is
    lower
    the
    earlier
    the
    account
    is
    outsourced
    and
    the
    work
    efforts
    followed
    early
    in
    the
    process
    mirror
    the
    hospital’s
    policies.  


Takeaway
#3:
Consumers
can
still
dispute
balances.

Mistakes
happen.
Reports
show
that

80%
of
medical
bills
contain
errors
,
costing
the
health
industry
$125
billion
or
more
annually
and
causing
significant
delays
with
reimbursements.
While
this
number
is
startling,
the
errors
range
from
coding
errors
causing
delays
in
billing
and
reimbursement
to
demographic
errors
of
the
patient’s
address
or
other
information.
Despite
hospitals’
best
efforts
with
quality
checks
and
auditing,
errors
continue,
and
hospitals
are
working
diligently
to
improve
this
fact.
Regardless,
whether
you
are
living
in
a
state
that
bans
medical
debt
reporting
or
not
you
as
a
consumer
have
a
right
to
dispute
your
debt
and
request
a
review
and
audit
of
inaccurate
balances. 

The
“weight”
or
value
of
medical
debt
on
a
credit
report
is
not
as
impactful
as
you
might
think.
Other
types
of
debt–credit
cards
and
installment
loans

are
scrutinized
far
more
closely
than
medical
debt
when
lenders
are
looking
at
the
whole
pie.


In
conclusion

Medical
debt
reporting
sits
at
the
intersection
of
healthcare,
finance,
and
policy

and
as
this
year
has
proven,
that
landscape
is
constantly
evolving.
While
federal
protections
have
stalled,
state
laws
and
credit
bureau
policies
still
offer
relief
for
consumers.
Hospitals
continue
to
rely
on
credit
reporting
as
a
source
of
financial
leverage,
but
it
is
up
to
patients
to
stay
informed,
proactive,
and
empowered
to
dispute
errors
and
understand
their
rights.


Photo
Credit:
freedigitalphotos
user
Naypon


Karie
Bostwick

is
Vice
President
of
People
and
Compliance
at

Revenue
Enterprises
,
where
she
has
spent
over
16
years
helping
healthcare
organizations
improve
patient
billing
experiences
and
operational
efficiency.
With
a
career
spanning
more
than
three
decades
in
revenue
cycle
management,
Medicaid
eligibility,
and
customer
service,
Karie
is
known
for
her
patient-centric
approach,
leadership
in
compliance,
and
dedication
to
creating
supportive
work
environments.
She
has
played
a
key
role
in
building
client
services,
enhancing
training
and
recruitment,
and
driving
technology
adoption
to
streamline
healthcare
collections.

This
post
appears
through
the MedCity
Influencers

program.
Anyone
can
publish
their
perspective
on
business
and
innovation
in
healthcare
on
MedCity
News
through
MedCity
Influencers. Click
here
to
find
out
how
.

An Entrepreneur’s Roadmap To A Profitable Business – Above the Law

Getty
Images

In
this
episode
of
the
“Be
That
Lawyer”
podcast,
host
Steve
Fretzin
and
Ral
West,
an
author
and
entrepreneur,
discuss
the
keys
to
sustainable
business
growth.

Ral
shares
practical
strategies
for
entrepreneurs
to
reclaim
their
time,
increase
profitability,
and
align
their
business
with
long-term
vision. 


Profitability:
Measure
What
Matters 

Ral
and
Steve
open
with
the
classic
Peter
Drucker
quote:
“If
you
can’t
measure
it,
you
can’t
manage
it.”

Ral
explains
how
tracking
the
right
business
metrics

especially
the
bottom
line,
not
just
revenue

transformed
her
approach
to
entrepreneurship.

She
shares
a
personal
story
about
learning
the
difference
between
making
money
and
making
a
profit,
and
how
focusing
on
profitability
is
essential
for
real
business
success. 


Quality
Over
Quantity:
Building
a
Pipeline
of
Ideal
Clients 

The
conversation
shifts
to
the
importance
of
qualifying
leads
and
building
a
pipeline
filled
with
quality
prospects,
not
just
volume.

Steve
and
Ral
discuss
how
attorneys
and
entrepreneurs
can
save
time
by
identifying
and
focusing
on
their
ideal
clients,
and
by
learning
to
say
no
to
work
that
doesn’t
fit
their
long-term
goals. 


Leverage
Through
Delegation
and
Automation 

Ral
emphasizes
that
true
growth
comes
from
effective
delegation
and
smart
use
of
automation.
She
shares
how
leveraging
technology
from
bookkeeping
software
to
AI
tools
that
organize
email
has
saved
her
hours
each
week,
allowing
her
to
focus
on
higher-value
activities. 

“You
cannot
grow
your
business
if
you
don’t
learn
to
delegate,
and
if
you
don’t
learn
to
get
some
of
these
pieces
off
your
shoulders,”
Ral
says.

Her
approach
offers
a
roadmap
for
entrepreneurs
to
build
a
business
that’s
profitable,
efficient,
and
aligned
with
their
true
goals.

Want
more
from
Ral
West? 


Get
to
know
her
work
and
insights
here.


Catch
the
full
podcast
episode
here. 

And
if
you’re
serious
about
growing
your
practice,
don’t
miss
my
new
book,
now
on
Amazon. Check
it
out
here.




Steve
Fretzin
is
a
bestselling
author,
host
of
the
“Be
That
Lawyer”
podcast,
and
business
development
coach
exclusively
for
attorneys.
Steve
has
committed
his
career
to
helping
lawyers
learn
key
growth
skills
not
currently
taught
in
law
school.
His
clients
soon
become
top
rainmakers
and
credit
Steve’s
program
and
coaching
for
their
success.
He
can
be
reached
directly
by
email
at 
[email protected].
Or
you
can
easily
find
him
on
his
website
at 
www.fretzin.com or
LinkedIn
at 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevefretzin.

From Firefights To Fixed Fees: Strategic Pricing In High-Stakes Legal Work – Above the Law

Litigation:
the
last
stronghold
of
hourly
billing.

On
this
episode
of
the
UpLevel
View
podcast,
hosts
Steph
Corey
and
Ken
Callander
talk
with
Grubhub’s
Katie
Armistead
about
how
legal
teams
are
bringing
order
to
the
chaos
with
phase-based
fees,
risk-sharing,
and
value-driven
pricing.


Changing
Models

It
can
often
be
difficult
to
convince
members
of
a
corporate
law
department
to
switch
pricing
models.
Here,
Steph
and
Katie
share
some
factors
that
can
convince
a
team
to
make
this
change.


Early
Conversations

Value-based
billing
changes
the
timing
of
conversations
about
budgets
and
invoices.
Here,
Katie
shares
how
that
can
change
the
dynamic
in
matters
that
use
this
approach.


Partnering
With
Procurement

Procurement
teams
have
evolved,
just
as
legal
teams
have,
Steph
notes.
Here,
she
explains
why
partnering
with
procurement
can
work
out
very
well
for
in-house
teams.


Hear
the
Full
Conversation

Curious
to
learn
more?
Check
out
this
episode
below.