Air Zimbabwe barred from using SA airports – The Zimbabwean

JOHANNESBURG – Air Zimbabwe has been barred from using South Africa’s airports.

Airports Company South Africa (Acsa) confirmed the suspension took effect on Tuesday.

It said the airline owes it an undisclosed amount of money.

Acsa, however, said it would not disclose the amount owed by the airline.

“The company informed Air Zimbabwe by letter on 18 October that it will not be allowed to depart from any of Airports Company South Africa’s nine airports and that the prohibition will remain in place until outstanding amounts are settled,” Acsa said in a statement.

“The suspension of an airline takes place only after considerable engagement with an airline’s management.”

Sanctions against persons contributing to the conflict in Zimbabwe – The Zimbabwean

25.10.2019 7:25

This document is explanatory only and does not have the force of law. Executive Orders 13288, 13391, 13469, applicable laws and the implementing regulations pertaining to Zimbabwe (31 C.F.R. Part 541) contain the legally binding provisions governing the sanctions. This document does not supplement or modify the Executive orders or the regulations.

The Zimbabwe sanctions program implemented by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) began on March 7, 2003, when the President issued Executive Order (“E.O.”) 13288. E.O. 13288 imposed sanctions against specifically identified individuals and entities in Zimbabwe, as a result of the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons undermining democratic institutions or processes in Zimbabwe. Following E.O. 13288, in response to the continued undermining of democratic institutions, the President issued two subsequent Executive orders that expanded the list of sanctions targets to include immediate family members of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked as well as those persons providing assistance to any such individual.

Read full report: zimb

US Statement on Zimbabwe Sanctions

Post published in: Featured

Yes, Even Smart People Fail The Bar Exam

What Biglaw name partner and former law school dean — called by Laurence Tribe “the most extraordinary student I had ever had” — failed the California bar exam in 2005 on the first try?

Hint: This person was already barred in New York and Massachusetts, and passed the California bar on the second try in 2006.

See the answer on the next page.

Republican Media Is Already At The ‘Trump Is Too Dumb To Fail’ Stage

Politics

The Wall Street Journal editorial page does its thing again.

—ADVERTISEMENT—

From the Above the Law Network

Changing Your Mindset: Tips To Improve Your Mental Health And Increase Happiness

Ed. note: This is the latest installment in a series of posts on motherhood in the legal profession, in partnership with our friends at MothersEsquire. Welcome Molly Daniel-Springs to our pages.

If you had told my first-year law school self that I would be writing an article about how to maintain/improve your mental health while parenting two toddlers and running a solo practice, I would have been all, not in this life. Almost 10 years later, here we are. I hope these tips help you on your journey.

Change your mindset. What is it with the insane expectations on working moms? A few days ago, I read a post on Facebook by Sarah Friedberg (the post went viral- look it up) that dropped so many truth bombs I found myself nodding and mmmhm-ing all over the place. Then I had my husband read it because he must know women are so superior. The gist of her post is that society expects us to be the perfect mothers, ideal workers, and doting wives. We are supposed to run the household, organize the social calendar, plan the vacations, handle the doctors’ appointments, participate in school functions [insert my feeling of total dread on this one], meal prep, make sure the animals don’t die of neglect, plan the birthday parties, make sure the kids are in swim lessons, do craft projects with them, buy their clothes and wash them, make sure they’re using their manners, be Santa and the Easter bunny and the tooth fairy, and keep the house clean and tidy, just to name a few. Oh, and maintain a career. And be a good human. Um… wut?

And the reality for many of us is that we have bought into this outrageous standard and take pride in “accomplishing” all of this — at the expense of our own well-being. That requires re-training. After trying to live up to these expectations for a couple of years, in early 2018, I decided to choose another path and strive for being a just okay mom, worker, and wife. I kid, I kid. But, really, I try to set realistic expectations for myself. In the same token, I try not to allow myself to feel guilty for doing so. Mom guilt is no joke and people have no problem laying it on thick.

Promote partnership. My husband and I both work. For most in the same position, the majority of the child care and “household” responsibilities still fall on us moms. One way I have found to combat this is to make to-do lists. They’re not for my husband; they’re for both of us. Here are a few things that were on my recent list: return software (J), lay pine straw, fix wheel barrel tire, pressure wash (J). My husband (Joseph) knows that everything with a (J) beside it is for him to do. Yes, I totally fixed that wheel barrel tire, like a boss. I put things on the list that, two years ago, I would have undoubtedly handled (think: schedule dentist, call plumber). Because not all of the household tasks, like returning an item, need to be my responsibility. I am in a partnership with my spouse, and these tasks should fall on us equally.

Sometimes, the best way for your partner to realize how much you actually do is to take a vacation sans kids and spouse (and work). I feel like my husband is well above-average in sharing the housework and the child care responsibilities (shout out to you, stud), but he still benefited from seeing all the things that did not get done while I was gone on a girls’ trip for a long weekend last year. If you’re wondering to yourself because I know all of you are, but really though, how did he survive? I’ll tell you. He doesn’t have as hard of a time as I used to in calling for help. It’s engrained in many of us that we can handle it because we are expected to handle it. Dads don’t have that problem. Neither should you.

Enlist help. Whether it’s a nanny, help from family, or putting your kids in daycare, having help with the kids is, for me, the number one stress reducer. We also have trusted family members who live nearby and help tremendously. And recently, I found a “mommy’s helper” who comes twice a month and assists in working down the list of household things that need to get done. It takes a village. Embrace yours.

Girls’ night. As a solo practitioner, networking is key (and as I write this article, I am reminded that I need to take networking off the backburner). As a mom, girls’ night is hashtag critical. Once a month, on average, we plan a dinner out. They’re my therapy and my tribe.

You time. My former boss and current mentor used to stress the importance of taking “you” time. Never has that advice been as valuable as it is now. When I need to step away for a moment because opposing counsel filed a frivolous motion or one of my toddlers lost her mind because I “didn’t put her potty seat on right,” I do just that. Go for a facial, run an errand, walk around the antique mall, scroll through Facebook marketplace. Don’t judge me.

In closing and as a last tip, give yourself and others grace. We’re not going to win every case or get it right every time, and we’re going to make mistakes in parenting. We’re all just trying to figure this out while maintaining enough wherewithal to show up for court without bodily fluids on our blazers.

EarlierMothers At Law: Achieving Meaningful Success In The Legal Profession


Molly Daniel-Springs is the owner of Springs Law Firm, a personal injury and social security disability firm in Charlotte, North Carolina. She is married with two toddlers and enjoys gardening, talking politics, and using sarcasm whenever possible.

Nightmare Tesla Lawsuit Is Why We Need Tort Law

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

On February 21, 1967, during a test procedure for Apollo 1, a fire occurred in the crew cabin. Astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee were killed in the accident. The crew could not be rescued, because the hatch door could not be opened from the outside by rescuers.

Despite America’s “space race” against the Soviet Union, the manned space program was halted from 20 months to investigate and address the causes of the accident.

In the public sector, when your technology kills people, you take it off the line and fix the problem before you put people in harm’s way.

The private sector is a little different.

This February, according to a lawsuit, Omar Awan was driving a Model S Tesla when he lost control and careened off the road. A fire ignited in the car. A crowd gathered and a police officer came while he was burning. But, according to the family, they couldn’t help because they could not open the car’s “auto-present” doors.

Backed by a strong earnings report, Tesla stocks are soaring today, up near $300/share.

From the Washington Post:

Awan’s death is one in a string of recent incidents that have been blamed on Tesla’s innovative technology. A lawsuit stemming from a May 2018 crash that killed two teens also blamed a battery fire for at least one of the deaths. ([Awan’s family attorney Stuart Grossman] represents the car’s third passenger, who survived the accident after being thrown from the vehicle.)

In April, surveillance footage from a Shanghai parking garage showed smoke billowing from a Model S moments before the car burst into flames. The widely shared video prompted Tesla to open an internal investigation.

Several other suits have attributed deaths to Tesla’s “Autopilot” system, an automatic driver-assistance feature.

“There are a number of these cases,” Grossman said. “What the hell is going on?”

After the Awan crash, Tesla did not halt production for 20 months. Instead:

Shortly after the February crash, a Tesla spokeswoman told the Florida Sun-Sentinel that “We are deeply saddened by this accident” but that “Tesla vehicles are engineered to be the safest cars in the world and Tesla drivers have driven more than 10 billion miles to date.”

Tort law is here for this. Tort law is the only thing that is here for this. You can make your jokes about tort lawyers or seemingly frivolous lawsuits — Lord knows I have. But at the end of the day, a private company like Tesla is never going to run its business with the kind of restraint as an agency like NASA, no matter how much the owner talks about going to space.

Unless the tort lawyers make them.

A man died in a burning Tesla because its futuristic doors wouldn’t open, lawsuit alleges [Washington Post]


Elie Mystal is the Executive Editor of Above the Law and a contributor at The Nation. He can be reached @ElieNYC on Twitter, or at elie@abovethelaw.com. He will resist.

BYU’s LawX Partners with Wilson Sonsini and SixFifty to Tackle Asylum through Design Thinking | LawSites

I have written a number of times here about the innovative LawX lab at BYU Law, in which students use design thinking to tackle issues in access to justice. The lab has already produced two notable applications: SoloSuit, an award-winning online tool to help self-represented people who have been sued for debt, and Hello Landlord, an online tenant-landlord communication tool designed to reduce evictions.

Now, the LawX lab is taking on the project of using design thinking to simplify the asylum process. But this time, the lab is joining forces on the project with the technology law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati and SixFifty, the technology subsidiary it launched earlier this year.

“We established LawX to teach students design thinking in tackling pressing access-to-justice issues, and we are honored to work on this project with Wilson Sonsini and SixFifty,” said Gordon Smith, dean of BYU Law. “Asylum fits nicely with the work BYU Law is already doing on immigration.”

BYU Law students enrolled in the LawX winter 2020 semester will use a design-thinking approach to build on the lessons learned from the two previous LawX projects. SixFifty will provide technical support for the project.

As in the past, the lab will be taught by Kimball D. Parker, who is the director of LawX and also the president of SixFifty. This year, he will be joined in teaching the lab by Marie Kulbeth, COO and general counsel at SixFifty, who is now also co-director of the lab. Kulbeth formerly worked at BYU Law as assistant dean of communications and marketing and is a graduate of the school.

The law school has already been regularly involved in asylum issues. Several times a year, faculty and students volunteer at the South Texas Family Detention Center in Dilley, Texas – the largest detention center in the country – to assist with credible-fear interviews for women seeking asylum. Kulbeth is among those who have volunteered there.

In addition, working in partnership with Deseret Industries, BYU Law offers direct representation on immigration law and other matters to individuals in the Utah Valley through its Community Legal Clinic.

“With such a daunting project as asylum, we are thrilled to collaborate with Wilson Sonsini, one of the best law firms in the world, to design this year’s solution,” said Parker. “We are confident that together we can do something very meaningful for a class of very vulnerable people.”

RELATED: LawNext Episode 32: Kimball Parker, Head of Wilson Sonsini’s New Tech Subsidiary SixFifty.

After WeWork’s Epic Buttfumble, SEC No Longer Curious How Snap IPO Happened

Jay Clayton’s people come to the conclusion that this IPO market might not be technically criminal, but it is certainly very extremely dumb.

Ask The Professor: Top 3 Things To Know If You Failed The Bar Exam

Bar exam results are out. You didn’t make it. Panic and grief sets in. Over the coming days and weeks, you will read about how many famous people like Hillary Clinton and John F. Kennedy, Jr., failed the bar exam, but this will not make you feel any better.

The only thing that will change your feelings will be to begin working on a plan of attack for the next time you take the exam. What was your strategy last time? What should you do differently this go around? Where will you find the answers?

We at Marino Bar Review have worked with thousands of students who have failed the bar exam. Some of them were very high profile people. We guided them to success on the bar exam by helping them follow these three simple steps:

1) Keep in mind that the bar exam does not test subject areas. People spend entire careers trying to master legal subject areas like Evidence or Constitutional Law. It is a fool’s errand to believe you could do so over the course of a couple of months. Instead, the bar exam tests rules. You do not need to know the entirety of Torts law; you just need to know the main 25 or so rules tested.

The last time you studied you spent weeks or even months skimming the surface of the law. But the exam isn’t nearly as big as it seems, and by focusing on what you study, you will have sufficient knowledge of the rules that are most frequently tested to pass the bar exam.

2) Don’t neglect any section of the bar exam. On the UBE, the essay section and the MBE section are each worth an equal number of points. While multiple choice is a large part of the bar exam, half of the exam is written and subjectively scored. Not all answers are equal and simply putting the correct answer on the page may not score you maximum points if you don’t know how to properly word it. Furthermore, it’s not as simple as the IRAC method you were taught in law school and led to believe was the best way to write by your previous bar review course. In fact, with the proper approach, you can score points even if you don’t know the rule being tested.

3) Don’t be afraid to get help. You need to know what went wrong on your last bar exam and your score report can give you a good amount of information about this. Everyone thinks that they just needed to study a little more or focus on the MBE, but the reality is that each exam taker’s scores and problems are unique. Just because your uncle, who took the bar exam many years ago, is convinced that you probably failed because you’re not good at answering multiple choice questions, does not mean this is actually the reason you were not successful. You can submit your score report to us here or email it to us at info@marinolegal.com and we will be happy to give you a completely free score evaluation and guidance on what went wrong and what you can do to improve your score for the next exam. We really know what we’re talking about!

Remember, the bar exam is not a referendum on your intelligence, nor is it an impossible hurdle. It is a hazing ritual that all future lawyers must go through. However, you need to approach studying for the exam the correct way or you will struggle to pass.

As always, if you have any questions about the bar exam or need help knowing where to start (or restart) your studying, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

We wish you good luck!