Turns Out Texas District Attorney Resigned Because He Was Under Investigation For Sexual Harassment

In October of 2018, Jim Wheeler resigned as the Wood County, Texas District Attorney. When he stepped down from public office, there wasn’t much information released about the why of the resignation. Thanks to a Texas Public Information Act request, it’s now come to light that he resigned after learning he was under investigation for sexual harassment. In fact, he resigned just two hours and 47 minutes after learning about the investigation.

As reported by Texas Lawyer, the investigation was sparked when an investigator became suspicious of Wheeler’s behavior towards First Assistant District Attorney Angela Albers. And it turns out Albers had been recording her interactions with Wheeler because she feared for her job and didn’t think others would believe her:

The allegations in the Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Ranger Division’s report show that Wood County D.A. investigator Jerry Hirsch was suspicious of Wheeler’s conduct toward then-First Assistant District Attorney Angela Albers. When Hirsch asked her, Albers admitted that Wheeler had been pursuing her for sex for eight months; she had been recording his comments for two months.

The report said Wheeler would say things like, “We could have fun together and no one would know,” and ask what Albers would do when he started putting his hands on her. He didn’t touch her physically, other than giving her “full-frontal hugs” in the office, said the report.

Though Wheeler provided no comment about the allegations, his dad had something to say:

But James Paul Wheeler, who is Jim Wheeler’s father and attorney, said that Jim Wheeler was not guilty of any crime.

“However, rather than go through any trial, if there was to be one, he made the determination that he would retire, and retired with the full retirement of 12 years and lifetime medical,” James Paul Wheeler said.

According to Upshur County District Attorney Billy Byrd, the official charged with prosecuting Wheeler, there was enough evidence to charge him with official oppression, which includes intentionally subjecting someone to sexual harassment. However, instead of filing charges against Wheeler, he asked him to resign — an exit Wheeler took. Byrd says this was done in the best interest of the victim:

“Being very involved with the victim and fully discussing all of those potential avenues of disposition, we felt this was in the best interest of justice. My oath of office is not to see that convictions happen, but to see that justice is done,” Byrd explained. “If there was a jury trial and a conviction, the same result would have happened, but getting to that point, there would have been a lot of information that was potentially harmful to other people, who were not victims.”

According to Texas law, when the District Attorney position becomes vacant, the First Assistant District Attorney becomes the acting district attorney. So, when Wheeler stepped down, Albers began managing the office and Texas Governor Gregg Abbott appointed her as D.A. in February.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Sugar, We’re Goin’ Down (Swinging): When It’s You Or The Business

Despite having never served in the armed forces, my former GC was inordinately fond of military expressions, usually involving insurrections and rebellions. But chief among them was his fervent assertion that when something was of utmost importance, he was ready to die on that hill. Of course, his sense of what constituted an issue of utmost importance ran the gamut from SEC financials disclosures to the brand of Caesar dressing our cafeteria served.

Now, while I’ll admit that I enjoyed the way his brows knit together as he informed us in a grim, but resolute tone that he would be dying on the hill that day, I always thought the sentiment was a little much. And to be frank, having always been of the mind that as long as the course of action proposed wasn’t illegal or unethical, the business will do what the business will do, regardless of whatever carefully crafted legal advice is offered, I wasn’t sure what was the point of getting so worked up.

Of course, the one time I dared suggest that maybe, just maybe, he was overreacting a smidge, my GC looked down at me like a bushy-browed Zeus lording over his poor, wretched mortals from atop Olympus, and told me that someday I’d understand that it was the principle of the thing.

Uh-huh. See, having spent quite a bit of time around business partners, you pick up this unique talent for sniffing out bullshit a mile away. And this was bullshit. I don’t care who you are (unless you’re Atticus Finch, and then by all means, get on with your bad self), if your best comeback as an in-house counsel is it’s the principle of the thing, you’re in trouble.

Well, it was all fun and games, my former GC and his quirks. Yes, it was all fun and games until Procurement suggested that we dismantle our document management system in favor of their new contract platform.

I saw red. I tasted red. I breathed and typed and emailed red. IN ALL CAPS. Who the heck did Procurement think they were making decisions for all business functions as to where contractual documents were not only stored but drafted? Plain English? Procurement would have the ability to change drafts without Legal being notified. Gone would be the chance to help determine the right form so we didn’t end up with a construction contract on a form for off-the-shelf goods. Gone would be our ability to hold back an internal draft while working out a tax issue that might tank the deal.

Anarchy, friends. I didn’t see red. I saw anarchy. That’s a color in the Crayola box, right?

Oh, fine. There was an honest-to-goodness hill — no, make it a mountain — that I was willing to — again, no. Just no. It’s still a morbid expression. Instead, I found myself hearkening back to that ubiquitous mid-2000’s Fall Out Boy track. And trust me when I tell you that sugar, I was going down swinging.

Now, the point of this story isn’t about how I thwarted Procurement (although to be clear, I thwarted them. I wouldn’t be telling this story if I crashed and burned. Because who wants to be that kid at the party?) The point, dear reader, is that this move by Procurement incensed me in a way that I had never been fired up, more so than being lied to by legions of fresh-faced salespeople on the regular. More so than having my cred repeatedly questioned because I have lady parts. Even more so than that time the VP of HR kept writing the word “irregardless” into my drafts.

I know, I know. Some of you are probably thinking right now, what’s the big deal, Thrace? It’s a freaking software platform, you control freak. Embrace change. Adapt or die.

I tried. I really did. I did a deep dive on the platform. I thought about it in the shower, on my drive to work, even on the all-sacred “do not talk business to me or even look at me while I’m sweating” gym treadmill. And finally, I knew what the GC really meant. It wasn’t the principle of the thing. It was the thing. Allowing this project to go forward as proposed would mean altering the way we partnered and negotiated all of our contracts, while potentially sacrificing the checks and balances we built into the process. And I wasn’t up for it. It was something I was willing to throw everything I had against it. There was swinging. So much swinging.

And in the end, my former GC was right. But please don’t tell him. Because it’s the principle of the thing.


Kay Thrace (not her real name) is a harried in-house counsel at a well-known company that everyone loves to hate. When not scuffing dirt on the sacrosanct line between business and the law, Kay enjoys pub trivia domination and eradicating incorrect usage of the Oxford comma. You can contact her by email at KayThraceATL@gmail.com or follow her on Twitter @KayThrace.

Morning Docket: 08.06.19

Cesar Sayoc

* The mail bomber, Cesar Sayoc, gets sentenced to 20 years in prison for sending 16 explosive devices to journalist, high ranking officials and former elected politicians. [New York Law Journal]

* Roger Stone would really like the D.C. Circuit to lift the gag imposed last month by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson. [Law360]

* In the wake of the latest round of mass shootings, the governments of Venezuela and Uruguay issue warnings for their citizens traveling in the U.S. [Huffington Post]

* With the courts being the way they are, don’t get too excited about the prospect of actual gun control. [Slate]

Zimbabwe’s Mugabe in Singapore hospital for extended stay – The Zimbabwean

President Emmerson Mnangagwa, in a statement released Monday, did not disclose what Mugabe is being treated for but the ex-leader “continues to make steady progress toward eventual recovery.”

Mnangagwa, a former ally who took over from Mugabe in 2017 with the help of the military, said physicians decided that Mugabe should be kept under observation for a lengthy period when he went for his “latest routine checkup.”

Mugabe ruled Zimbabwe with an iron fist from independence in 1980 until he resigned under pressure from the military and his party in 2017. He has regularly visited Singapore for medical treatments for more than 10 years. Mugabe previously said the visits were for scheduled checkups after an eye operation.

With Zimbabwe’s health system rapidly deteriorating, many of the country’s top officials fly out of the country for medical treatment. Vice President Constantino Chiwenga, a former army general who led the military’s revolt against Mugabe, was airlifted last month to China, after previously getting medical treatment in India and South Africa.

Zimbabwe lies in ruins after government leaders destroy once-thriving economy

Post published in: Featured

Zimbabwe lies in ruins after government leaders destroy once-thriving economy – The Zimbabwean

“No. I am South African, going to a family function in Zimbabwe,” I answered. “Oh, I hope it all goes well,” the man said.

It turned out the man was Zimbabwean. He was going home, after a sojourn to see his relatives in Benoni.

The man quickly shared the story of his collapsed footwear and jewellery business in Harare, and the difficult choice he had to make: either pay a bribe or let his successful business collapse.

“My religion does not allow me to pay a bribe. I am a Muslim, my brother. So, I let my business go down.

“Everyone who does business in Zimbabwe today pays a bribe,” the man said, with tears refusing to be hidden.

“I am very sorry, Sir.” Those were my last words to the man who did not tell me his name. He, too, did not ask for mine. And off we flew to Zimbabwe, where visitors are welcomed by a big billboard at the airport advertising the country as “the place of the majestic Victoria Falls”.

My host waited to pick me up and drive from Harare to Gweru, a distance of just under 300km , southwest of Harare on the N2 highway to Bulawayo.

Having informed him that I had not been to Zimbabwe since 2005, my host drove me around Harare before we hit the highway to Gweru. From the airport we drove through Hatfield, Harare’s equivalent of Sandton.

Today Harare’s Hatfield can’t be mentioned in the same sentence with Sandton. It looks worse than a God-forsaken neighbourhood in Brakpan. What we call potholes in SA is nothing. Zimbabwe has real road holes.

As we drove from one small town to another, my host kept showing me something: “You see, uncle, that is Zimbabwe’s new trademark.”

He was showing me long queues at fuel stations.

Every fuel station in Zimbabwe has an unbelievably long queue, some as long as 4km. My host refuelled his car from a drum in his son’s house.

What about water? It is a scarce commodity. If you are lucky to have it flow through your tap, you just don’t drink it – or else you contract cholera. There are billboards warning about cholera.

As for electricity, Zimbabweans get it between midnight and 5am. With our own Eskom, we cannot afford to laugh at Zimbabweans.

About 50km outside Harare, my host showed me a brown-looking piece of land. “That farm belongs to Gideon Gono, the former governor of Zimbabwe’s reserve bank who presided over the collapse of our currency.

“I still remember the bank notes Mr Gono used to print 20,000; 500,000, and something like that.”

Today nobody knows what Zimbabwe’s currency is: the US dollar? the rand? government bond? I was swindled R1,021.54 via $72.00 in a simple chicken-meat transaction that deserves a complex PhD thesis in banana economics.

My host, a black chartered accountant, showed me Gono’s farm.

“It is very sad that Zimbabwe now imports maize,” he said.

Here is a simple truth: The place called Zimbabwe is not a country; it is a sad story of a liberation movement gone mad.

A big Zanu-PF billboard in Harare, bearing the smiling picture of President ED Mnangagwa, reads: “2019 the year of rebuilding the party through ideological training.”

My heart sank as I looked at it, and I laughed.

Zimbabwe’s Mugabe in Singapore hospital for extended stay
Zimbabwe Reaches ‘Tipping Point’ as Inflation Blacked Out

Post published in: Business

Zimbabwe Reaches ‘Tipping Point’ as Inflation Blacked Out – The Zimbabwean

Emmerson Mnangagwa

At the same time he spoke of fiscal surpluses and a relaxation in local ownership requirements for the key platinum industry. This all happened in a country with daily power cuts of up to 18 hours and shortages of everything from bread to motor fuel. People are receiving food aid in cities for the first time and a drought has necessitated the import of hundreds of thousands of tons of corn.

When Robert Mugabe was ousted after four decades in power in late 2017 his replacement, Emmerson Mnangagwa, promised economic regeneration and declared that Zimbabwe is “open for business.” Instead things have gone from bad to worse with the effects of rapidly expanding money supply through the sale of Treasury bills under Mugabe’s rule coming home to roost and this year’s outlawing of the U.S. dollar in favor of a local quasi currency that can’t be traded outside the country causing panic.

“Zimbabwe is at a tipping point and if it falls over the edge it’s going to be quite a long way in coming back,” said Derek Matyszak, a Zimbabwe-based research consultant for South Africa’s Institute for Security Studies. “The wheels are falling off. There is no way out of a Ponzi scheme other than a massive infusion of cash to pay off your creditors.”

The country with the world’s highest inflation rate after Venezuela also suspended annual consumer-price data for the next six months. The authorities need to collect comparable data since the introduction of the new currency in February. That marked a return to 2009, when the country abandoned the Zimbabwe dollar in favor of the U.S. dollar and other currencies after inflation surged to an estimated 500 billion percent.

If the more commonly used black-market exchange rate is used, Zimbabwe’s annual inflation is currently 558%, about three times the official rate, while Venezuela’s is 35,004%, according to Steve H. Hanke, a professor of applied economics at the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

Scrapping the official annual rate is “no real loss from an analytical perspective,” said Jee-A van der Linde, an economist at NKC African Economics in Paarl, South Africa. “These elevated inflation readings did little more than create panic and damage what little confidence was left.”

Still, the decision evokes other countries in crisis. Venezuela halted publication of inflation data and while it periodically releases figures, it isn’t operating on a regular schedule. In 2013, Argentina was censured by the IMF for tampering with its data.

A de-linking of the country’s quasi-currencies from parity with the U.S. dollar in February and the re-imposition of the Zimbabwe dollar overnight in June has fueled depreciation with the currency officially trading at 9.28 to the dollar on Aug. 2. The black-market rate was 10.8, according to Marketwatch.co.zw, a website run by analysts. While the government has argued that in the face of foreign-currency shortages it has no choice but to reintroduce its own currency, Hanke disagrees.

“The Achilles heel is the introduction of the new currency to the exclusion of the dollar,” he said. “They have decided to go in the completely opposite direction and claimed it’s the best thing since sliced bread and it’s going to be an absolute disaster.”

Zimbabwe lies in ruins after government leaders destroy once-thriving economy
Living on a Prayer

Post published in: Business

Hundreds Of Law School Grads Seek Refunds After California Bar Exam Essay Topic Leak

(Image via Getty)

We don’t yet have a total for the no-shows for this exam, so we can’t compare this number yet to figures for past exams. In July 2018, for example, the no-show rate was a little over 10 percent.

— California State Bar spokeswoman Teresa Ruano, commenting on the projected number of people who failed to attend the July 2018 administration of the California bar exam, likely due to a topics leak that occurred just days before the test. Ruano said that more than 9,000 test-takers were originally expected, but that more than 600 people sought refunds this year due to the bar’s unprecedented disclosure of essay topics.


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

The Legal Chief Of Staff: A Critical Role For General Counsel’s Success

With ever-growing pressure to integrate in-house legal departments into the businesses they serve, we are seeing significant growth in the corporate legal operations (CLO) field. These legal operations professionals — many of whom are not attorneys — are taking on greater responsibility and are increasingly shaping corporate legal departments. And more and more, general counsels, especially of mid-size and large legal departments, are hiring legal chiefs of staff to help run their teams.

So, what is a legal chief of staff? And is this function here to stay? The short answer is “likely yes.”

The legal chief of staff is often the member of the general counsel’s senior leadership team charged with strategic thinking and planning. Though each legal chief of staff role varies, they generally manage a wide range of responsibilities to support the legal, compliance, ethics, or security operations of a business. She is often a trusted advisor who leads with regard to vision, mission, and execution. She also often oversees strategic priorities, tracks key performance indicators (KPIs), operates budget team culture, and manages communication.

“As the general counsel position evolves, so does the chief of staff position,” says Colin McCarthy, Legal Operations Analyst, Twitter, Inc.  He explains, “As the right hand to the general counsel, the chief of staff is increasingly called upon to have an applied understanding of the current legal landscape and be a champion for advancements in legal operations.  This involves using data to make smart decisions and fostering strong partnerships with finance and technology staff to develop a roadmap for the future of the legal department.” 

The legal chief of staff often facilitates internal and external meetings of the CLO’s executive leadership team, including monthly, quarterly, or annual legal all-hands meetings. She may oversee a variety of special projects, including investigations or technology integrations, staff management, and other logistical operations. In some companies, she may even be highly involved in board meetings, as many general counsels also serve as secretary of their company’s board.

McCarthy explains, “Prioritizing legal operations is important for the chief of staff position.” According to him, “Introducing tools, processes, and automation to the legal department helps make business more efficient and nimble. Tools like contract management systems, knowledge management, matter management/e-billing, and dashboards all add great value to the legal department. The information/reporting that is collected from these tools helps to inform the chief of staff/general counsel to make data-driven decisions around hiring, diversity, support, business impact, and growth.”

Depending on her role, the legal chief of staff may be an attorney, though she does not have to be one. While her legal knowledge and understanding of legal processes would likely be an asset, other skills — being organized, efficient in project management, a strong communicator, cross-functional, demonstrating emotional intelligence, financially literate, or comfortable with technology — are at least as important as legal experience or knowledge.

In reviewing various recent and past legal chief of staff job descriptions, I have noted, above all, variety. Ultimately, the seniority, status, and responsibilities of the legal chief of staff tend to vary by general counsel and legal department. It is not unusual for the legal chief of staff to compensate for general counsel’s lack of expertise in certain areas, such as in departmental financial planning, the use of technology, or other strategic skills. At its core, the role of the legal chief of staff is to do what is necessary to make the stars align for the legal department and general counsel.

What do you think? Is the legal chief of staff role just a passing trend? Or is it here to stay? Will it help create more effective and efficient legal departments? 


Olga V. Mack is an award-winning general counsel, operations professional, startup advisor, public speaker, adjunct professor at Berkeley Law, and entrepreneur. Olga founded the Women Serve on Boards movement that advocates for women to serve on corporate boards of Fortune 500 companies. Olga also co-founded SunLaw to prepare women in-house attorneys become general counsel and legal leaders and WISE to help women law firm partners become rainmakers. She embraces the current disruption to the legal profession. Olga loves this change and is dedicated to improving and shaping the future of law. She is convinced that the legal profession will emerge even stronger, more resilient, and inclusive than before. You can email Olga at olga@olgamack.com or follow her on Twitter @olgavmack.