Ranking
For
The
Sake
Of
Ranking:
The
Princeton
Review
found
a
plethora
of
ways
to
rank
law
schools
other
than
the
straightforward
ones.
King
&
Spalding
Upping
The
Pressure:
To
get
associates
back
in
the
office.
Do
AI
Bots
Dream
Of
Electric
Benchslaps?:
Butler
Snow
lawyers
earn
one
of
the
harshest
AI-related
sanctions
yet.
Librarians
To
The
Rescue:
Law
librarians
talk
shop
about
being
on
the
frontline
against
disinformation
and
figuring
out
how
to
deal
with
AI.
That
Trump
Pro
Bono
Will
Have
To
Wait:
A&O
Shearman
delays
some
start
dates.
Habba
Dabba
Do:
Alina
Habba
shouldn’t
be
the
U.S.
Attorney
for
New
Jersey,
but
she’s
not
letting
“statutes”
stop
her.
Take
A
Hike!:
Is
one
Biglaw
bonding
option.
We
Just
Can’t
Quit
You:
The
tale
of
the
Biglaw
Biter
has
legs
—
or
should
I
say
teeth.
HARARE
–
At
least
100
traders
were
left
counting
losses
after
a
fire
broke
out
at
Glenview
Area
8
home
industry
destroying
property
worth
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
Sunday
morning.
City
of
Harare
SMEs
Committee
chairperson
Denford
Ngadziore
said
the
fire
was
caused
by
security
guards
who
were
warming
themselves.
“The
affected
traders
include
those
manufacturing
wardrobes,
kitchen
units,
sofas,
and
other
carpentry
products.
“The
estimated
loss
is
approximately
US$100,000.
“Preliminary
investigations
suggest
the
fire
was
unintentionally
started
by
security
guards
on
duty,
who
were
warming
themselves
by
a
fire
that
later
spread
around
5:00
AM,”
he
said
in
a
statement.
According
to
Ngadziore
the
City
of
Harare
Fire
Brigade
swiftlt
reacted
and
helped
to
contain
the
fire
before
it
caused
greater
destruction.
Currently,
over
4,000
traders
operate
from
the
Glenview
Area
8
complex.
The
complex
frequently
encountered
fire
breakouts
which
have
been
attributed
to
human
error.
The
last
inferno
was
in
2023.
Ngadziore
said
recently,
the
City
of
Harare
SMEs
Committee
conducted
a
site
visit
and
engaged
the
traders’
representative
committee
to
assess
the
situation
and
discuss
a
sustainable
way
forward.
He
said
it
was
agreed
that
traders
should
resume
formal
monthly
payments
to
Council
a
process
that
has
been
suspended
for
the
past
3
to
4
years.
‘Unfortunately,
during
this
time,
funds
have
been
misappropriated
by
private
individuals,
undermining
council
operations
and
service
delivery.
“As
the
SMEs
Committee,
we
will
take
keen
interest
in
the
ongoing
investigations.
“It
is
our
strong
position
that
those
on
duty
must
be
held
accountable
and
prosecuted
for
their
negligence,
which
resulted
in
this
costly
disaster,”
he
said.
He
said
looking
ahead,
the
only
lasting
solution
is
a
comprehensive
redevelopment
of
the
Glenview
SMEs
Complex.
Ngadziore
said
the
committee
has
resolved
to
implement
this
through
a
Public-Private
Partnership
(PPP),
guided
by
urban
planning
and
fire
safety
regulations,
to
replan
and
modernize
the
facility.
“On
a
brighter
note,
construction
of
a
modern
People’s
Market
nearby
is
expected
to
commence
soon.
“This
initiative
is
aligned
with
the
City’s
approved
architectural
designs
and
will
feature
over
30
modern
kiosks—creating
a
safer,
cleaner,
and
more
dignified
environment
for
traders.’
HARARE
–
The
High
Court
has
dismissed
a
bid
by
the
Rusape
Town
Council
to
silence
a
local
resident,
affirming
the
constitutional
right
to
freedom
of
expression.
Justice
Sijabuliso
Siziba
rejected
the
council’s
application
for
a
final
interdict
against
Takudzwa
Noel
Mwashaenyi,
who
had
publicly
criticised
the
municipality’s
handling
of
tenders
and
financial
affairs.
The
court
found
that
the
council’s
move
to
take
legal
action
against
Mwashaenyi
was
an
attempt
to
suppress
legitimate
public
scrutiny.
Mwashaenyi
had
accused
the
council
on
social
media
and
WhatsApp
platforms
of
corruption
in
the
awarding
of
a
tender
to
Hurntspine
Enterprises
(Pvt)
Ltd.
The
court
ruled
that
his
statements
fell
under
fair
comment
and
were
protected
by
the
right
to
free
expression.
“A
public
body
such
as
the
applicant
has
no
right
to
muzzle
or
suppress
public
criticism
about
its
operations,”
said
Justice
Siziba.
He
emphasised
that
criticism
is
a
cornerstone
of
democracy,
adding,
“Freedom
of
expression
constitutes
one
of
the
essential
foundations
of
a
democratic
society.”
The
Rusape
Town
Council
argued
that
Mwashaenyi’s
claims
damaged
its
reputation
and
made
it
harder
to
attract
investors.
However,
the
court
maintained
that
allowing
public
bodies
to
sue
for
defamation
in
such
cases
would
severely
restrict
citizens’
ability
to
hold
them
accountable.
Justice
Siziba
dismissed
all
preliminary
objections
and
lifted
the
interim
interdict
that
had
been
granted
to
the
council.
While
acknowledging
that
some
of
Mwashaenyi’s
claims
may
have
contained
inaccuracies,
the
judge
held
that
this
did
not
override
his
right
to
speak
out.
“There
will
be
no
order
as
to
costs,”
the
court
ruled,
signalling
its
recognition
of
the
broader
public
interest
at
stake.
Mwashaenyi
was
represented
by
Leonard
Chigadza
from
the
Zimbabwe
Lawyers
for
Human
Rights.
Bulawayo,
Zimbabwe
– When
Lloyd
Muzamba
was
critically
injured
in
a
car
accident
on
the
Harare–Bulawayo
highway
in
2023,
he
needed
an
urgent
blood
transfusion
to
save
his
life.
Despite
being
admitted
at
Mpilo
Central
Hospital,
the
biggest
public
health
facility
in
Zimbabwe’s
Matabeleland
region,
a
shortage
of
supplies
meant
the
doctors
didn’t
have
enough
for
him.
In
desperation,
Muzamba’s
family
turned
to
their
only
other
option
–
a
nearby
private
hospital
that
sold
them
the
three
pints
of
blood.
But
at
a
cost
of
$250
per
pint,
Muzamba
–
who
earned
a
$270
monthly
salary
and
had
no
savings
–
could
not
afford
it.
With
time
running
out,
the
family
had
to
make
a
plan.
Eventually,
Muzamba’s
uncle
sold
a
cow
for
$300
and
asked
other
relatives
to
contribute
the
balance.
Two
years
on,
the
now
recovered
Muzamba
says
the
incident
has
left
him
psychologically
wounded,
as
he
worries
about
other
emergencies
when
people
may
need
lifesaving
blood.
“Three
pints
can
be
a
small
number;
others
might
need
more
than
that.
But
due
to
the
costs
involved,
it
becomes
life-threatening,”
said
the
35-year-old,
who
works
in
a
hardware
store
in
Bulawayo.
“I
could
not
get
the
blood
without
paying
or
making
a
payment
plan.
It
was
a
painful
experience
for
an
ordinary
Zimbabwean
like
me.”
Muzamba’s
is
not
an
isolated
case.
With
ongoing
currency
woes,
rising
costs
of
living
and
high
levels
of
poverty,
desperate
Zimbabweans
in
need
of
care
face
life-threatening
delays
due
to
financial
barriers.
This
includes
blood
shortages
–
despite
supplies
being
free
in
public
health
facilities.
Advertisement
Tanaka
Moyo,
a
mother
of
two
in
the
capital
Harare,
also
experienced
the
stress
of
needing
to
pay
for
emergency
blood
supplies
during
the
delivery
of
her
second
child.
After
excessive
postpartum
haemorrhaging,
the
38-year-old
street
vendor
needed
four
pints
of
blood.
Together
with
her
husband,
a
security
guard,
she
had
struggled
to
raise
money
for
the
birth
of
their
child.
The
sudden
need
for
a
blood
transfusion
was
a
shocking
unplanned
cost.
“My
husband
ran
around
and
borrowed
money
from
a
microfinance
institution.
The
interests
are
steep
and
conditions
stringent,
but
he
had
to
act
quickly,”
said
Moyo.
“At
the
hospital,
they
insisted
the
blood
was
free
–
but
it
was
not
available.”
Plaxedes
Charuma,
a
gynaecologist
in
Bulawayo,
says
“postpartum
haemorrhage
is
the
leading
cause
of
maternal
mortality”.
The
prevalence
of
the
condition
means
that
hospitals
should
always
have
supplies
on
hand
to
deal
with
maternal
blood
loss
emergencies
that
arise,
health
experts
say.
A
maternity
ward
at
a
hospital
in
Harare,
Zimbabwe
[Philimon
Bulawayo/Reuters]
According
to
the
Community
Working
Group
on
Health
(CWGH),
a
network
of
civic
health
organisations
in
Zimbabwe,
the
country
faces
a
high
demand
for
blood
transfusions,
and
those
most
affected
are
pregnant
women.
“About
half
a
million
pregnancies
are
expected
in
Zimbabwe,
and
in
some
of
these,
there
is
excessive
blood
loss,
requiring
transfusion
of
at
least
three
pints
of
blood,”
said
Itai
Rusike,
CWGH’s
executive
director.
“Maternal
mortality
in
Zimbabwe
remains
unacceptably
high,”
Rusike
told
Al
Jazeera.
“Timely
blood
transfusion
prevents
maternal
deaths,
which
in
Zimbabwe
stands
at
212
women
dying
per
every
100,000
live
births.”
‘Free
blood
for
all’
Generally,
there
are
two
major
types
of
blood
transfusions:
allogeneic
and
autologous.
Autologous
transfusion
refers
to
self-same
blood
donation
by
an
individual
for
their
own
use
later.
Allogeneic
transfusion,
which
is
the
most
common
in
Zimbabwe,
involves
administering
blood
donated
by
one
person
to
another
who
matches
their
blood
type.
The
National
Blood
Service
Zimbabwe
(NBSZ)
is
the
body
that
oversees
blood
donation
and
distribution
in
the
country.
It
operates
as
an
independent
not-for-profit
entity,
but
it
is
mandated
by
law
to
collect,
process
and
distribute
blood
throughout
Zimbabwe.
While
the
Ministry
of
Health
and
Child
Care
is
permanently
represented
on
its
board
of
directors,
NBSZ
functions
independently
of
hospitals
and
government
health
institutions.
It
is
not
present
in
every
facility,
but
maintains
decentralised
distribution
from
five
regional
centres:
Harare,
Bulawayo,
Gweru,
Masvingo
and
Mutare.
Advertisement
Historically,
patients
in
Zimbabwe
paid
for
blood,
but
over
the
years
the
government
worked
on
lowering
costs
–
from
$150
a
pint
in
2016
and
prior
to
$50
by
2018.
The
government
then
went
a
step
further
in
July
that
year,
deciding
that
blood
would
be
made
free
at
all
public
health
institutions.
“The
free
blood
for
all
move
is
going
ahead
as
planned
and
mechanisms
have
already
been
put
in
place
to
finance
the
move,
and
come
July
1
[2018],
blood
will
be
available
for
free,”
said
then-Minister
of
Health
and
Child
Care
Dr
David
Parirenyatwa
during
the
June
2018
World
Blood
Donor
Day
celebrations.
However,
despite
the
policy,
hospitals
continue
to
face
shortages.
This
May,
there
was
a
critical
lack
of
blood
in
public
hospitals,
a
situation
that
threatened
the
lives
of
thousands
of
people,
the
Ministry
of
Health
and
Child
Care
said
in
a
statement.
Al
Jazeera
contacted
ministry
spokesperson
Donald
Mujiri
to
ask
about
the
shortage
and
the
implementation
of
the
free
blood
policy,
but
he
did
not
respond
to
our
requests
for
comment.
NBSZ,
meanwhile,
said
that
May’s
shortage
was
due
to
operational
and
systemic
challenges
that
disrupted
its
ability
to
carry
out
routine
blood
collection
activities.
“Without
timely
financial
support,
we
faced
constraints
in
mobilising
outreach
teams,
securing
fuel,
and
procuring
essential
supplies,”
Vickie
Maponga,
NBSZ
communications
officer,
told
Al
Jazeera.
“Additionally,
the
crisis
was
exacerbated
by
a
seasonal
dip
in
donations,
particularly
from
youth,
who
make
up
over
70
percent
of
our
donor
base.”
These
shortages
regularly
result
in
patients
on
the
front
line
needing
to
buy
blood
at
private
clinics.
In
most
cases,
the
patient
is
physically
transferred
to
the
private
facility
for
the
transfusion,
where
they
pay
the
costs.
In
some
cases,
the
patient
pays
and
the
private
hospital
sends
the
blood
to
them
in
the
public
hospital.
A
World
Blood
Donor
Day
awareness
street
march
in
Zimbabwe
[Courtesy
of
NBSZ]
Crucial
blood
donations
The
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
aims
to
ensure
that
all
countries
practicing
blood
transfusions
obtain
their
blood
supplies
from
voluntary
blood
donors.
The
NBSZ
told
Al
Jazeera
that
a
sustainable
blood
supply
in
Zimbabwe
depends
on
cultivating
a
culture
of
regular,
voluntary
donations,
particularly
among
the
youth
and
underserved
communities.
The
service
has
a
mobile
outreach
model,
through
which
it
brings
blood
donation
drives
directly
to
schools
and
communities.
To
further
engage
the
youth,
Maponga
said
they
also
started
a
club
that
“encourages
young
people
to
commit
to
donating
blood
at
least
25
times
in
their
lifetime”.
“We
also
integrate
blood
donation
awareness
into
school
programmes
and
partner
with
tertiary
institutions
to
maintain
continuity
post-high
school,”
she
said.
Ivy
Khumalo,
32,
is
one
of
those
who
has
been
donating
blood
since
she
was
in
high
school.
But
she
says
the
lack
of
blood
donation
centres
around
her
now
limits
her
ability
to
give
as
an
adult.
“As
a
school
child,
it
was
[first
started]
as
a
result
of
peer
pressure,
but
I
found
it
fascinating,”
Khumalo
said.
“It
was
only
when
I
was
an
adult
that
I
made
a
personal
decision
to
continue
donating
out
of
love
to
save
life
and
help
those
in
need.”
Advertisement
But
since
moving
from
Bulawayo
to
Hwange,
she
said,
donating
blood
has
become
expensive
as
the
nearest
centre
is
in
Victoria
Falls,
over
100km
(62
miles)
away.
NBSZ
says
it
routinely
deploys
mobile
blood
drives
around
the
country.
It
also
says
it
offers
donors
incentives.
“Regular
donors
who
meet
specific
criteria
such
as
having
made
at
least
10
donations,
with
the
most
recent
within
the
past
12
months,
qualify
for
free
blood
and
blood
products
for
themselves
and
their
immediate
family
members
…
in
times
of
medical
need,”
explained
Maponga.
However,
for
keen
donors
like
Khumalo,
the
effort
to
reach
a
far-off
donation
site
is
a
barrier
to
entry.
“In
such
circumstances,
it
is
no
longer
a
free
donation
as
I
spent
money
going
there.
In
the
end,
most
of
us
decide
to
stay
home
despite
the
passion
for
blood
donation,”
she
said.
CWGH’s
Rusike
says
the
NBSZ
and
Ministry
of
Health
and
Child
Care
must
urgently
devise
innovative
and
sustainable
ways
to
increase
the
number
of
eligible
blood
donors.
“The
government
should
utilise
the
Health
Levy
Fund
of
5
percent
tax
on
airtime
and
mobile
data
as
it
was
set
up
to
specifically
subsidise
the
cost
of
blood
and
assist
public
health
institutions
to
replace
obsolete
equipment
and
address
the
perennial
drug
shortages
in
our
public
health
institutions,”
he
said.
“That
money
should
be
ring-fenced
and
used
for
its
intended
purpose
in
a
more
accountable
and
transparent
manner.”
A
woman
works
at
a
National
Blood
Service
Zimbabwe
(NBSZ)
lab
[Courtesy
of
NBSZ]
Promises
and
shortages
Authorities
say
that
as
of
mid-2025,
Zimbabwe’s
national
blood
supply
is
showing
good
progress,
and
NBSZ
has
already
collected
over
73
percent
of
its
half-year
target
(the
2025
annual
target
is
97,500
units).
The
blood
service
also
says
the
Ministry
of
Health
and
Child
Care
plays
a
central
role
in
both
subsidising
and
overseeing
the
cost
of
blood
within
the
public
health
sector.
“Since
2018,
this
[free
blood
policy]
is
made
possible
through
a
government-funded
coupon
system,
which
absorbs
the
full
cost
of
$250
per
unit,
resulting
in
zero
cost
to
the
recipient
[in
public
hospitals],”
said
Maponga.
The
NBSZ
maintains
that
it
operates
on
a
cost
recovery
basis.
It
says
the
entire
chain
of
collecting,
processing
and
distributing
a
pint
of
blood
costs
$245.
The
agency
charges
$250,
making
a
$5
profit
per
pint.
However,
prices
at
some
private
facilities
can
reach
as
much
as
$500
per
pint,
Zimbabweans
say.
This
has
sparked
heated
debate
on
social
media,
as
the
high
cost
remains
far
out
of
reach
for
many
people.
“NBSZ
does
not
have
regulatory
authority
over
how
those
institutions
price
their
services
to
patients,”
said
Maponga,
explaining
that
while
blood
itself
is
donated
freely,
the
journey
from
“vein
to
vein”
involves
a
complex
and
resource-intensive
process.
Observers,
however,
say
more
can
be
done
to
lower
the
costs
of
blood
transfusions.
“At
closer
look,
the
whole
chain
of
blood
transfusion
can
cost
less
than
$150
by
strategically
deploying
available
resources,
use
of
financial
donor
stakeholders
like
corporates,
and
also
holding
the
government
accountable
to
fund
the
whole
process,”
said
Carlton
Ntini,
a
socioeconomic
justice
activist
in
Bulawayo.
The
issue
of
free
blood
in
the
public
hospitals
is
noble,
Ntini
said,
but
without
full
implementation,
it
remains
a
false
hope
and
only
benefits
the
“lucky”
few,
as
shortages
are
the
order
of
the
day.
“In
reality,
any
amount
above
$50
per
pint
of
blood
will
still
be
high
to
Zimbabweans,
and
it’s
a
death
sentence,”
he
said.
Advertisement
Meanwhile,
for
patients,
the
cost
of
essentials
only
adds
to
an
already
stressful
situation.
Muzamba
was
fortunate
in
that
his
family
did
not
claim
back
the
money
they
gave
him
for
his
blood
transfusion.
But
Moyo
and
her
husband
struggled
to
settle
their
$1,000
loan
debt,
which
escalated
to
$1,400
after
interest.
“It
psychologically
drained
me
more
than
the
physical
pain
as
I
wondered,
‘Where
would
I
get
such
money
in
this
economy?’”
said
Moyo.
“The
government
must
own
up
to
its
promises
–
it’s
not
only
about
being
free,
but
must
be
accessible.”
Erratic
economic
policy,
high
inflation,
and
currency
instability
have
for
years
discouraged
foreign
investment
in
Zimbabwe.
But
economic
fundamentals
are
improving
and
a
new
gold-backed
local
currency
–
the
Zimbabwe
Gold
(ZiG)
–
has
largely
held
its
value
this
year.
Foreign
participation
on
the
Zimbabwe
Stock
Exchange
rose
to
26.53%
in
the
second
quarter
from
15.39%
in
the
previous
quarter,
the
newsletter
published
on
Thursday
said.
Foreign
trades
jumped
153.94%
to
ZiG
743.6
million
($27.7
million),
up
from
292.8
million
in
Q1.
In
comparison,
foreign
investors
accounted
for
over
40%
of
activity
on
the
ZSE
in
the
early
2010s.
Total
market
turnover
on
the
ZSE
increased
53.14%
to
ZiG
1.49
billion
in
the
quarter,
the
newsletter
said.
The
total
market
value,
however,
fell
3.08%
to
ZiG
62.64
billion,
while
the
ZSE
All
Share
Index
declined
3.91%
to
close
the
quarter
at
197.23
points.
“The
total
turnover
for
the
top
five
companies
contributed
86.19%
of
the
equities
turnover
and
81.01%
of
the
total
market
turnover
for
the
period
under
review,”
the
newsletter
said.
On
the
Victoria
Falls
Stock
Exchange,
a
U.S.
dollar-denominated
bourse
designed
to
attract
offshore
capital,
turnover
reached
$15
million
in
Q2,
while
market
capitalisation
slipped
to
$1.25
billion
from
$1.29
billion
in
the
previous
quarter.
Average
foreign
participation
on
the
exchange
stood
at
18.73%.
An
uptick
in
participation
and
turnover,
alongside
governance
reforms
like
the
ZSE’s
self-listing
earlier
this
month
could
lay
the
groundwork
for
further
recovery
in
the
second
half
of
the
year,
analysts
said.
The
International
Monetary
Fund,
meanwhile,
has
welcomed
the
ZiG’s
stability
but
is
urging
fiscal
and
monetary
discipline.
This
is
according
to
the
results
of
the
country’s
first
economic
census,
which
present
a
striking
picture
of
how
pervasive
the
informal
economy
has
become.
Informal
businesses
in
the
Southern
African
country
have
now
“increasingly
become
a
significant
source
of
livelihoods,
its
contribution
to
government
revenue
remains
minimal
due
to
non-compliance
with
the
formal
tax
system,”
the
Zimbabwe
National
Statistics
Agency
said
in
a
report
released
on
Wednesday.
According
to
the
country’s
most
prevalent
industry
body,
the
Confederation
of
Zimbabwe
Industries,
the
situation
poses
a
“critical
risk”
to
the
country’s
economy.
“Formal
businesses
are
being
squeezed,”
MacDonald
Mutengo,
CZI’s
lead
research
officer,
said
at
the
event.
“Companies
are
not
making
profits,
they
are
highly
regulated.”
The
informal
sector’s
expansion
is
mostly
a
reaction
to
the
loss
of
official
job
prospects
brought
on
by
decades
of
economic
mismanagement,
hyperinflation,
and
periodic
currency
depreciations,
as
seen
on Bloomberg.
According
to
the
economic
census,
which
surveyed
over
204,798
businesses,
wholesale
and
retail
trade
accounts
for
73%
of
the
informal
economy’s
activity.
Manufacturing
trailed
behind
at
8%.
Bulawayo
has
the
largest
concentration
of
formal
enterprises
among
Zimbabwe’s
provinces,
at
40%,
significantly
outpacing
other
areas
where
the
formal
sector
make
up
less
than
30%
of
the
local
market.
The
growth
of
the
informal
sector
in
other
African
markets
kenya
market
Based
on
a
2024
report
by
the
Kenya
National
Bureau
of
Statistics
(KNBS),
the
informal
sector
employs
83.6%
of
the
workforce,
or
approximately
17.4
million
people.
Notably,
the
informal
sector
created
703,700
new
jobs,
accounting
for
90%
of
all
new
employment
outside
of
small-scale
agriculture.
In
Nigeria,
the
informal
sector
is
also
dominant.
According
to
Moniepoint’s
Informal
Economy
report,
89.4%
of
Micro,
Small,
and
Medium
Enterprises
(MSMEs)
do
business
informally.
However,
unlike
with
Zimbabwe,
an
impressive89%
of
these
informal
enterprises allegedly
pay
some
type
of
tax,
suggesting
that
taxing
of
this
section
is
possible
if
properly
handled.
Waiting
Is
The
Hardest
Part:
A&O
Shearman
incoming
associates
won’t
start
job
until
January
2026.
I’m
Not
Even
Sure
What
Law
School
Quality
Of
Life
Even
Means:
But
some
schools
seem
to
ace
it.
Like
A
Bad
Penny,
Alina
Habba
Keeps
On
Turning
Up:
Screw
the
rule
of
law
and
judicial
independence!
The
Biggest
In
Biglaw:
NYC
edition.
The
Librarians
Know
What’s
Up:
Dispatch
from
the
American
Association
of
Law
Libraries
annual
meeting.
Librarians
don’t
come
across
as
folks
who
storm
the
Bastille.
But
when
the
118th
annual
meeting
of
the
American
Association
of
Law
Libraries
met
in
Portland
this
week
under
a
banner
exhorting
the
group
to
“Be
Bold,”
deep
thoughts
about
the
Dewey
decimal
system
gave
way
to
revolutionary
resolve.
In
his
keynote
address,
Roosevelt
Weeks,
the
Fort
Bend
County
library
director,
reaffirmed
the
core
values
of
the
profession
to
serve
the
public
and
preserve
knowledge.
And
that
calling
requires
librarians
to
be
both
“strategic
and
subversive,”
prompting
a
cathartic
release
from
an
assembled
body
battered
by
an
assault
of
budget
cuts
and
book
bans.
Step
outside
the
comfort
zone
to
make
sure
the
money
people
understand
the
library’s
importance
and
make
sure
the
customer
gets
the
knowledge
they
seek
at
a
time
where
powerful
interests
keep
throwing
up
roadblocks.
It
sparked
the
librarian
equivalent
of
running
through
a
wall
after
a
locker
room
speech:
filing
out
of
the
room
in
an
orderly
fashion.
The
attendees
needed
this
sort
of
a
pep
talk
to
heal
some
cracks
in
solidarity.
Rumbling
under
the
buzz
of
the
vendor
hall,
some
public-side
librarians
harbored
some
frustration
toward
their
private-sector
counterparts.
It’s
a
professional
conference
and
not
Real
Housewives
so
I
never
had
the
opportunity
to
Andy
Cohen
my
way
through
the
dispute,
but
the
folks
suffering
the
brunt
of
DOGE-fueled
haphazard
budget
cuts
and
“wokeness”
crackdowns
orchestrated
by
grandstanding
politicos
feel
a
little
abandoned
by
Biglaw
and
private
school
librarians
keeping
their
heads
down.
If
it’s
a
professional
organization,
where’s
the
professional
support?
It’s
a
dicey
situation
though.
When
Biglaw
managing
partners
cower
in
fear
whenever
Trump
talks,
a
Biglaw
firm
librarian
doesn’t
necessarily
enjoy
the
freedom
to
stand
up
in
righteous
indignation.
That’s
how
authoritarianism
works:
atomize
communities
to
divide
and
conquer.
Forcing
rifts
within
the
guild
is
the
whole
play.
It’s
also
further
support
for
the
need
to
be
“strategic
and
subversive.”
Recognize
that
not
everyone
can
fight
the
same
fight
the
same
way,
but
those
who
can’t
fight
can’t
forfeit
their
obligation
to
find
creative
avenues
to
support
their
colleagues.
Because,
as
the
experience
of
Biglaw
surrender
firms
shows,
the
machine
can
and
will
come
for
the
private
sector
soon
enough.
A
panel
on
media
literacy
briefed
librarians
on
the
struggle
against
disinformation.
Or
how
civilization
is
circling
the
drain
while
we
play
whack-a-mole
with
InfoWars.
Randy
Blazak,
Chair
of
the
Oregon
Coalition
Against
Hate
Crime,
framed
the
discussion
through
the
work
of
Emile
Durkheim.
You
know,
like
most
lawyer
conversations.
But
specifically,
Durkheim’s
concept
of
anomie:
a
condition
of
normlessness
where
people
suffer
free-floating
dismay
at
their
inability
to
cope.
Durkheim’s
work
focused
on
a
rise
in
suicide
during
industrialization.
Today
it’s
getting
into
QAnon
to
deal
with
the
fact
that
minorities
live
down
the
street.
There’s
a
reason
Make
America
Great
Again
never
gets
too
explicit
about
what
they
mean
by
“great.”
The
descent
into
crazy
has
long
been
a
funnel,
taking
mainstream
conservative
thought
at
the
top
and
watching
as
some
of
those
Republican
Rotarians
get
a
little
too
into
anti-government
rhetoric
and
then
QAnon
and
then
zip-tying
a
member
of
Congress.
And
then,
obviously,
getting
a
senior
DOJ
post
in
this
administration.
But
the
mouth
of
the
funnel
is
wider
than
ever
post-COVID
and
the
process
is
compressed.
The
red-pill
brick
road
from
anti-vaxxing
to
January
6
is
a
lot
shorter
than
it
was
from
William
F.
Buckley
to
Oklahoma
City.
Librarians
can’t
fix
everything,
but
they
do
serve
as
a
key
intervention
point
in
the
disinformation
process.
For
law
librarians,
they
can
tend
the
switch
that
diverts
the
next
sovereign
citizen.
It’s
a
little
like
a
flu
shot
in
the
middle
of
a
bioweapon
attack,
but
it’s
a
role
that
the
librarians
can
uniquely
fill.
A
panel
on
the
librarian’s
role
in
historical
research
provided
an
unintentional
counterpoint.
If
the
morning
session
addressed
fighting
disinformation,
this
one
involved
librarians
being
used
to
manufacture
it.
With
originalist
judges
getting
high
on
18th-century
vibes,
librarians
are
tasked
with
compiling
the
material
that
feeds
that
fuels
that
judicial
addiction.
Some
quantitative
data
from
the
session
revealed
that
the
Supreme
Court
—
in
particular
the
conservatives
—
are
increasingly
citing
endogenous
materials
outside
of
any
of
the
briefs.
And
while
judges
should
endeavor
to
get
the
right
answer
regardless
of
the
briefing,
the
briefs
have
the
benefit
of
surviving
the
adversarial
process.
When
a
judge
yanks
a
book
from
obscurity
and
tells
the
parties,
“interesting
argument,
but
anyway
I
read
this
instead”
it
undermines
the
deliberative
process.
Anyway,
it’s
the
librarians
gathering
all
that
endogenous
history
at
the
behest
of
the
justices.
And
certainly
it’s
their
job
to
deliver
for
their
customers,
it
just
felt
like
a
process
designed
to
enable
the
worst
impulses
in
disingenuous
jurists.
For
example,
judges
prefer
online
materials
for
the
same
reasons
of
convenience
we
all
do,
but
this
by
its
nature
exclude
wide
swaths
of
actual
history.
Librarians,
by
and
large
don’t
want
to
deliver
half
the
story
just
because
it’s
the
only
part
that
someone
bothered
to
digitize,
but
that’s
what
the
courts
demand.
One
librarian
noted
taking
the
time
to
learn
corpus
linguistics
to
serve
judges
who
might
request
the
fashionable
academic
tool
to
abuse
in
search
of
a
cherry-picked
textual
meaning.
Apparently,
no
judge
had
yet
taken
up
that
service
at
the
library
in
question,
but
maybe
it’s
because
they’ve
already
started
using
AI
for
all
their
fake
language
history
needs.
Hell,
soon
the
Federalist
Society
won’t
need
librarians
at
all!
As
the
research
presented
at
the
panel
revealed,
justices
(and
presumably
the
judges
copying
them)
are
citing
more
secondary
sources
these
days.
Research
can
be
so
darn
inconvenient
for
reverse
engineering
a
result,
but
prepackaged,
pseudo-historical
law
reviews
written
by
intellectual
fellow
travelers
provide
an
end
run
around
the
academic
rigor
librarians
bring
to
the
process.
Get
some
FedSoc
flunkies
to
slap
together
some
historical-ish
footnotes
and
get
it
published
by
some
2L
journal
staff
hoping
to
bolster
their
future
clerkship
prospects!
It’s
not
so
much
research
as
it’s
intellectual
laundering.
Bringing
us,
inevitably,
to
the
robots.
Like
everywhere
else
in
2025,
artificial
intelligence
dominated
the
conference.
The
vendor
hall
provided
an
AI
petting
zoo
showing
off
the
proprietary
work
being
done
to
herd
large
language
models
into
professionally
responsible
pens.
Law
librarians
may
not
control
the
tech
budget,
but
they
might
be
the
fiercest
internal
constituency
a
vendor
can
nurture.
They
survived
the
digital
revolution
and
came
out
the
other
side
as
knowledge
managers…
they
will
hold
a
lot
of
sway
in
how
the
next
phase
of
legal
research
plays
out.
Yet
for
all
its
promise,
AI
is
already
part
of
the
legal
research
problem.
Stephen
Embry
already
wrote
about
the
risk
AI
poses
to
the
very
development
of
critical
thinking
skills.
But
the
decision
to
jam
AI
into
everything
causes
fundamental
research
miscues
too.
No
one
writes
a
brief
off
Google,
but
sometimes
you
need
a
basic
internet
search
just
to
figure
out
where
to
even
begin.
But
now
users
don’t
even
go
into
the
various
primary
resources
the
engine
finds
because
there’s
a
half-assed
summary
at
the
top
that
dissuades
anyone
from
scrolling
down.
This
even
came
up
in
at
the
conference
—
during
the
originalism
panel,
someone
mentioned
Elena
Kagan
saying
“we’re
all
originalists
now”
at
her
confirmation
hearings.
Except
she
didn’t.
The
“we’re
all
______
now”
construction
comes
from
Kagan’s
2015
Harvard
Law
School
lecture
where
she
said
we’re
all
textualists
now.”
During
her
confirmation
hearings,
in
response
to
an
inquiry
about
the
Framers
and
search
and
seizure,
Kagan
said,
“sometimes
they
laid
down
very
specific
rules.
Sometimes
they
laid
down
broad
principles.
Either
way
we
apply
what
they
say,
what
they
meant
to
do.
So
in
that
sense,
we
are
all
originalists.”
A
minor
distinction
to
be
sure,
especially
when
you
remember
textualism
and
originalism
are
just
advertising
copy
for
the
same
garbage
jurisprudence.
BUT,
the
error
made
its
way
into
the
session
because
when
you
ask
Google
you
get:
This
is
the
slop
people
have
to
wade
through
now.
As
John
Adams
might
say,
“vibes
are
stubborn
suggestions.”
That’s
an
exact
quote
I’m
sure
because
AI
tells
me
so.
Librarians
form
the
last
line
of
defense
against
an
information
apocalypse.
It’s
not
just
those
budget
cuts
and
book
bans.
They’re
also
watching
AI
slop
supercharge
disinformation
campaigns
and
casually
mislead
users
while
being
told
that
the
real
threat
to
democracy
is
a
drag
queen
reading
Where
the
Wild
Things
Are.
Law
librarians
may
not
face
the
latter
problem
as
often
but
as
the
guardians
of
the
body
of
legal
research
that
undergirds
a
common
law
system,
they’re
fighting
off
all
the
other
problems
while
being
told
they’re
going
to
be
replaced
by
a
mansplaining
machine
spitting
out
fake
cases.
It’s
an
all
around
depressing
moment.
But
one
that
the
librarians
can
face
down
if
they’re
strategic
and
subversive
enough.
Since
lawyers
usually
cannot
handle
all
of
the
matters
that
cross
their
desks,
attorney
referrals
are
a
huge
part
of
the
legal
industry.
Oftentimes,
referrals
are
good
for
both
attorneys
involved
—
the
referring
attorney
can
maintain
contact
with
other
lawyers
and
ensure
a
client
is
looked
after
while
the
attorney
receiving
a
referral
gets
work. However,
sometimes
lawyers
have
matters
that
are
properly
handled
by
a
given
lawyer
for
free
or
turned
down
entirely
because
they
are
too
small,
lack
merit,
or
cannot
be
monetized. In
such
cases,
lawyers
can
hurt
other
attorneys
if
they
refer
such
matters
rather
than
handle
the
clients
themselves.
When
I
was
just
getting
my
law
practice
off
the
ground,
I
was
open
to
all
types
of
referrals. Some
really
helped,
but
at
other
times,
lawyers
simply
offloaded
their
friends
and
relatives
onto
me
when
they
did
not
feel
like
offering
free
legal
advice
to
people
they
knew.
For
instance,
one
time
someone
referred
their
mother
to
me.
She
felt
jilted
by
a
service
for
which
she’d
paid
a
few
thousand
dollars.
This
prospective
client
wanted
to
pursue
claims
against
the
service
provider
for
providing
work
that
did
not
live
up
to
expectations.
I
very
patiently
told
the
person
that
it
often
did
not
make
sense
to
engage
a
lawyer
to
pursue
claims
for
a
few
thousand
dollars.
Even
if
all
I
did
was
write
a
demand
letter
or
draft
litigation
papers,
the
amount
of
the
fees
could
easily
exceed
the
total
value
of
the
claim.
The
lawyer
who
referred
his
mother
to
me
should
have
just
written
his
mother
a
demand
letter
for
free
or
taken
some
action
on
her
behalf
by
himself.
Instead,
I
needed
to
spend
time
explaining
the
mechanics
of
the
claim
and
how
it
did
not
make
sense
to
hire
a
lawyer
even
though
I
did
not
have
a
pre-existing
relationship
with
this
lawyer’s
mother.
Another
time,
someone
referred
a
matter
to
me
—
also
worth
a
few
thousand
dollars
—
involving
an
area
of
the
law
with
which
only
specialized
lawyers
are
familiar. I
again
had
to
explain
how
it
did
not
make
sense
to
engage
a
lawyer
for
this
small
claim,
and
I
had
to
do
some
research
on
this
area
of
the
law
to
make
sure
that
I
did
not
give
this
person
the
wrong
advice. The
lawyer
who
tried
to
refer
this
matter
to
me
could
have
done
the
exact
same
amount
of
research,
and
he
should
have
done
it
rather
than
me
since
he
had
a
friendship
with
the
prospective
client.
Attorneys
may
think
they
can
pawn
off
matters
they
should
handle
themselves
without
significant
consequences,
but
such
referrals
can
have
a
negative
impact
on
a
law
practice. Many
lawyers
live
and
die
by
reviews
they
receive
online. Accordingly,
even
if
a
lawyer
refers
a
matter
that
cannot
be
monetized
to
another
attorney,
that
attorney
will
likely
need
to
do
some
level
of
work
on
the
matter
so
they
do
not
receive
a
bad
review. In
addition,
the
lawyer
receiving
the
referral
may
need
to
conduct
research
on
an
issue
and
waste
time
that
can
be
spent
on
other
work.
All
told,
every
lawyer
is
confronted
by
friends
and
family
members
who
have
small
legal
matters
or
questions
that
cannot
really
be
monetized
by
other
lawyers.
In
such
instances,
lawyers
should
usually
not
refer
the
matters
to
other
attorneys.
Rather,
they
should
help
their
friend
or
relative
themselves. Other
attorneys
usually
cannot
monetize
such
matters,
and
the
one
who
already
has
a
connection
to
such
friends
and
relatives
should
spend
the
time
needed
to
give
these
individuals
legal
advice.
Jordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of The
Rothman
Law
Firm,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of Student
Debt
Diaries,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at jordan@rothman.law.