‘I Don’t Even Draw, Bro’ Is A Really Weird Defense When ‘It Was Locker Room Talk’ Was Right There All Along – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Win
McNamee/Getty
Images)

If
you
have
been
online
at
all
over
the
course
of
the
past
several
weeks,
you
know
a
little
something
about
the
raging
MAGA
civil
war.
It
is
impossible
to
follow
all
the
daily
twists
and
turns,
even
for
those
of
us
whose
job
it
is
to
stay
informed.

The
broad,
general
concept
is
that
conspiracy-minded
Donald
Trump
supporters
had
long
been
calling
for
Trump’s
Department
of
Justice
to
release
the
Jeffrey
Epstein
client
list
of
prominent
people
the
deceased
financier
had
supposedly
procured
underage
women
for
(thinking
and
hoping
that
the
list
would
be
populated
by
all
of
the
Democrats
they
hate).
It
seemed
like
this
might
be
close
to
happening
when
in
February

Trump’s
attorney
general
Pam
Bondi
said

it
was
“sitting
on
my
desk
right
now
to
review”
when
asked
about
the
Epstein
client
list
by
FOX
News.

Fast
forward
a
few
months,
and
the
official
stance
of
the
DOJ
has
changed
to
the
assertion
that
no
Epstein
client
list
exists.
Meanwhile,
Trump
has
been

viciously
berating
his
own
supporters

who
won’t
move
on
from
their
questions
about
Epstein’s
associates.

Naturally,
all
of
this
has
brought
a
lot
more
attention
to
Trump’s
previous
relationship
with
Epstein.
Although,
according
to
Trump,
the
two
had
a
falling
out
in
later
years,
it
is
no
secret
that
they
were
pretty
good
pals
for
quite
a
long
time.
We
know

Trump
flew
on
Epstein’s
private
jet
between
Palm
Beach
and
New
York

at
least
seven
times
during
the
15
years
or
so
when
they
seemed
to
be
friends.
Photographs
and
even
videos
exist
of
the
two
men
partying
together
over
the
years.

Then
there
is
how
the
two
once
talked
about
one
another.
There
was
a
time
when
Epstein
said
he
was
Trump’s
“closest
friend.”
As
to
how
Trump
felt
about
Jeffrey
Epstein,

Trump
said
to
New
York
magazine
in
2002
,
“I’ve
known
Jeff
for
15
years.
Terrific
guy.
He’s
a
lot
of
fun
to
be
with.
It
is
even
said
that
he
likes
beautiful
women
as
much
as
I
do,
and
many
of
them
are
on
the
younger
side.”

Trump
has
gotten
away
with
brazen
lie
after
brazen
lie
in
his
political
career
with
no
apparent
loss
of
support
among
his
hardcore
base.
So,
perhaps
he
thought
he
could
do
it
yet
again
when
it
came
to
denying
the
extent
of
his
relationship
with
Epstein
and
defending
the
dramatic
flip
flops
on
the
Epstein
files
by
his
own
Justice
Department.

This
time,
it
seems
Trump’s
strategy
is
backfiring
spectacularly,
only
drawing
more
oxygen
to
the
flames.
I’ll
emphasize
again
that
there
is

just
too
much

for
any
one
person
to
fully
keep
track
of,
from
an
Epstein
accuser
allegedly
having

urged
the
FBI
to
investigate
Trump
decades
ago

to
Trump’s
recent
gambit
that

releasing
utilitarian
grand
jury
testimony

will
somehow
satiate
his
critics
(reminiscent
of
the
time
during
his
first
term
when
he
thought
rebranding
his
“border
wall”
as
“steel
slats”
would
somehow
settle
the
controversy).

To
focus
on
one
small
sliver
here,
the
way
the
president
has
chosen
to
target
his
legal
fight
over
the
Epstein
files
scandal
is
particularly
baffling.
On
July
18,

Trump
filed
a
$10
billion
defamation
suit

against
The
Wall
Street
Journal,
as
well
as
its
owner
Rupert
Murdoch,
over
new
reporting
from
the
legendary
financial
newspaper
that
Trump
had
contributed
a
sexually
suggestive
letter
with
a
crude
drawing
of
a
nude
woman
to
a
book
of
“bawdy
letters”
made
to
commemorate
Epstein’s
50th
birthday
in
2003.
Trump
defended
himself
on
his
social
media
platform
against
the
reporting
on
this
“FAKE
letter”
in
part
by
claiming,
“I
don’t
draw
pictures.”

And
that,
like

what?
“I
don’t
draw
pictures”?
I
mean,
forget
about
for
a
moment
the
fact
that
Trump
has
given
multiple
handmade
drawings
of
his
to
charities
over
the
years
and
that
the
naked
woman
drawing
in
question
has
a
similar
style
and
similar
signature
to
many
of
those.
Instead,
ask
yourself
whether
there’s
anyone
anywhere
on
earth
who
can
truthfully
claim,
“I
don’t
draw
pictures.”

Not
even
as
a
child?
You’ve
never
doodled
in
the
margins
of
a
notebook?
Never
sketched
out
a
rudimentary
map
in
the
roadside
gravel?
I
am
about
the
least
artistic
person
available
when
confronted
with
Pictionary,
yet
even
as
I
write
these
words
there
is
a
journal
sitting
right
in
front
of
me
on
my
coffee
table
with
a
bad
depiction
of
my
dog
scribbled
in
on
the
very
first
page
from
back
in
2020.

These
are
veterans
reporters.
The
Wall
Street
Journal
is
a
not
a
publication
to
put
something
out
that
they
know
they
could
be
sued
over
without
having
every
corner
of
the
story
locked
down
tightly
in
advance.
Remember,
it
was

The
Wall
Street
Journal
that
took
down
Theranos

and
its
notoriously
litigious
CEO
Elizabeth
Holmes.

Trump’s
lawsuit
against
The
Wall
Street
Journal
is
likely
to
only
bring
even
more
attention
to
his
Epstein
connections.
In
discovery,
it
is
likely
that
even
more
damaging
information
about
his

interventions
in
the
Epstein
case

will
come
out.
On
the
other
hand,
in
Trump’s
defense,
we’ve
got
“I
don’t
draw
pictures”
(he

has
doubled
down
on
that
claim

too,
saying,
a
bit
more
productively
“I
don’t
draw
pictures
of
women”
in
one
instance,
while
also
oddly
phrasing
the
claim
as
“I
never
wrote
a
picture
in
my
life”).

When
Trump
was
caught
saying,
in

the
infamous
Access
Hollywood
tape
from
2005
,
how
he
kissed
women
and
groped
their
genitals,
he
defended
his
statements
with
a
memorable
characterization
of
them:
“this
was
locker
room
talk.”
Although
he
did
later
imply
that
the
video
had
somehow
been
altered,
when
the
recording
was
released
weeks
before
the
2016
presidential
election,
Trump
at
first
simply
acknowledged
its
content,
apologized,
and
went
on
to
win.

It
wouldn’t
have
been
that
hard
for
Trump
to
say,
when
confronted
with
the
old
drawing
he
allegedly
made
for
Epstein’s
50th
birthday,
something
along
the
lines
of,
“It’s
been
well
documented
that
Epstein
and
I
were
friends
a
very
long
time
ago
before
anyone
came
to
know
about
his
horrible
criminal
life,
I
had
no
idea
that
he
was
a
pedophile,
and
it
was
not
unusual
for
middle-aged
men
to
send
each
other
‘locker
room
drawings’
during
that
time
for
a
milestone
birthday.”
Instead,
Trump
comes
out
with,
“I
don’t
draw
pictures.”
Which
would
be
a
bit
like
denying
the
validity
of
the
Access
Hollywood
tape
by
saying,
“I
don’t
speak
in
parking
lots.”

Well,
Epstein
files
rabbit
holes
was
not
what
I
expected
to
finally
bring
the
MAGA
base
to
its
senses.
But
we’ll
see
what
happens,
and
I’ll
certainly
accept
the
unforced
error
on
Trump’s
part.
Good
luck
with
the
lawsuit,
bro.




Jonathan
Wolf
is
a
civil
litigator
and
author
of 
Your
Debt-Free
JD
 (affiliate
link).
He
has
taught
legal
writing,
written
for
a
wide
variety
of
publications,
and
made
it
both
his
business
and
his
pleasure
to
be
financially
and
scientifically
literate.
Any
views
he
expresses
are
probably
pure
gold,
but
are
nonetheless
solely
his
own
and
should
not
be
attributed
to
any
organization
with
which
he
is
affiliated.
He
wouldn’t
want
to
share
the
credit
anyway.
He
can
be
reached
at 
[email protected].

6 Health Systems that Faced Worker Strikes This Month – MedCity News

From
hospice
centers
to
emergency
rooms,
frontline
healthcare
workers
across
the
country
have
been
striking
this
month
to
protest
what
they
say
are
unsafe
patient
care
conditions
and
poor
bargaining
behavior.

Below
are
six
examples
of
union
activity
resulting
in
a
strike

all
of
which
occurred
in
July.


Ascension
Saint
Agnes
Hospital
(Baltimore,
Maryland)

Nurses
at
Ascension
Saint
Agnes
Hospital
in
Baltimore
are
planning
a
one-day
strike
on
July
24.
They
are
frustrated
by
ongoing
tensions
regarding
staffing
levels,
patient
safety
and
high
turnover.

This
marks
the
first
time
hospital
nurses
have
ever
gone
on
strike
in
Baltimore.

“We
are
striking
because
patients
cannot
get
the
best
care
due
to
hospital
management’s
staffing
decisions
that
have
led
to
a
staffing
crisis,”
Melissa
LaRue,
a
nurse
in
Ascension
Saint
Agnes’
intensive
care
unit,
said
in
a

statement
.
“During
contract
negotiations,
we
have
put
forward
many
proposals
to
address
our
concerns
about
patient
safety
and
safe
staffing.
We
want
Ascension
to
come
to
the
bargaining
table
so
we
can
reach
an
agreement
that
puts
patients
first.”


Essentia
Health
(Northeast
Minnesota
and
Wisconsin)

Clinical
workers
at
outpatient
facilities
owned
by
Essentia
Health
ended
a
13-day
strike
on
Tuesday.
The
strike
involved
more
than
300
clinic
nurses
and
400
advanced
practice
providers.

These
workers
went
on
strike
to
protest
Essentia’s
failure
to
negotiate
first-ever
contracts
in
good
faith,
and
they
alleged
unlawful
interference
with
union
organizing.
The
strike
ended
after
these
employees
reached
an
agreement
with
Essentia
to
resume
collective
bargaining
under
improved
terms. 

“For
too
long,
outpatient
care
has
been
treated
like
an
afterthought,”
Dana
Bukovich,
a
nurse
at
Essentia’s
Superior
Clinic,
said
in
a

statement
.
“We’ve
made
it
clear
that
patients
in
clinics
deserve
the
same
safe
standards
as
patients
in
hospitals

and
we
won’t
stop
until
they
get
them.”


University
Medical
Center
New
Orleans 

A
group
of
about
600
nurses
at
University
Medical
Center
New
Orleans,
which
is
owned
by
LCMC
Health,
went
on
a
two-day
strike
last
week.
The
strike
marks
the
hospital’s
fourth
in
less
than
a
year. 

The
nurses
allege
that
the
hospital
has
been
disciplining
and
firing
experienced
nurses
who
are
prominent
union
organizers,
as
retaliation
for
their
union
advocacy. 

“Singling
out
pro-union
nurses
shows
that
LCMC
is
using
discipline
to
retaliate
against
us,”
said
Dana
Judkins,
a
nurse
in
the
hospital’s
trauma
intensive
care
unit,
in
a

statement
.
“We’re
striking
to
let
them
know
we
won’t
tolerate
retribution
for
advocating
for
ourselves
and
our
patients.”


HealthPartners
Clinic
(Stillwater,
Minnesota)

About
80
clinical
workers
at
HealthPartners
Clinic
Stillwater
went
on
a
four-day
unfair
labor
practice
strike
that
began
July
8.
These
workers
included
licensed
practical
nurses,
certified
medical
assistants
and
other
service-unit
healthcare
staff
members.

The
group
said
the
main
reason
for
the
strike
was
the
hospital’s
refusal
to
offer
meaningful
wage
increases.

“The
wages
the
employer
is
offering
us
are,
frankly,
insulting.
Even
for
our
highest
paid
members,
they’re
talking
about
increases
that
are
less
than
70
cents
per
year
in
their
most
recent
pass.
We
refuse
to
accept
that
this
is
the
best
HealthPartners
have
to
offer
us.
This
vote
solidifies
that
we
have
each
other’s
back
and
that
we
will
stand
together
and
demand
better.
If
we
don’t
get
what
we
deserve
from
the
employer,
we’re
ready
to
strike,”
Ellie
Hilton,
a
providers
assistant
at
the
clinic,
said
in
a

statement
.


McLaren
Macomb
Hospital
(Mount
Clemens,
Michigan)

A
group
of
employees
at
McLaren
Macomb
Hospital
went
on
a

three-day
strike

that
began
on
July
7.
The
group
includes
about
500
nurses,
as
well
as
another
200
clinical
support
staff
members.

The
workers
cited
chronic
unsafe
staffing
levels
and
low
wages
as
their
reasons
for
the
strike,
along
with
allegations
that
management
was
bargaining
in
bad
faith.


Hospice
of
Petaluma
(Petaluma,
California)
and
Memorial
Hospice
(Santa
Rosa,
California)

Clinical
workers
at
Hospice
of
Petaluma
and
Memorial
Hospice,
both
owned
by
Providence,
went
on
a
two-day
strike
that
began
July
2.
The
group
included
more
than
100
people

mainly
nurses,
home
health
aides,
chaplains
and
social
workers.

The
workers’
main
concerns
centered
on
preserving
patient
caseload
limits
and
care
standards
amid
Providence’s
planned
joint
venture
with
private
equity–backed
Compassus

which
hospice
workers
fear
could
decrease
the
quality
of
the
end-of-life
care
they
provide.

“Providence
is
often
seeking
to
save
money
at
the
expense
of
patient
care
and
we’re
worried
that
our
services
will
be
greatly
reduced
under
a
new
private
equity
operator,
unless
we
can
enshrine
protections
in
our
union
contract,”
Tim
Johnson,
a
social
worker
at
Memorial
Hospice,
said
in
a

statement
.

Morning Docket: 07.23.25 – Above the Law

*
Pam
Bondi
fires
Alina
Habba’s
replacement
from
her
First
Assistant
job
apparently
because
she
doesn’t
understand
that
her
appointment
has
nothing
to
do
with
being
First
Assistant.
Crackerjack
legal
team!
[Politico]

*
The
first
Trump
DOJ
said
Ghislaine
Maxwell
was
untrustworthy
and
motivated
to
lie
about
anything
to
save
herself.
Second
Trump
DOJ
says,
“ooh,
really?”
[MSNBC]

*
While
global
Biglaw
firms
cowered
before
Trump,
small
firms
fought
back.
[NY
Times
]

*
Judges
reject
first
DOJ
bid
to
unseal
Epstein
records.
Whaddya
know…
the
Trump
administration
muffed
the
effort
to
release
Epstein
material?!?
No
way
they
did
that
on
purpose!
[NY
Law
Journal
]

*
Man
brings
knife
to
courthouse
where
marshals
carry
guns,
apparently
forgetting
the
Chicago
Way.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Cocoa
slave
labor
suit
fails
at
DC
Circuit.
[Law360]

*
Court
lets
White
House
continue
locking
out
media
outlets
it
wants
to
extort
for
favorable
coverage.
Real
healthy
democracy
we
got
here.
[Reuters]

Magistrate sues lawyer husband’s mistress for adultery

HARARE

A
Chivhu-based
magistrate
is
suing
her
husband’s
lover
for
adultery
damages.

Sandra
Mupindu
accuses
Catherine
Tatenda
Chitopota
of
snatching
her
husband
Simon
Mupindu,
who
is
a
prominent
Harare
lawyer.

Chitopota
is
a
former
intern
at
the
lawyer’s
legal
practice.

The
magistrate
says
her
husband’s
adultery
has
caused
her
immense
emotional
distress.

In
a
High
Court
application,
she
is
seeking
damages
from
Chitopota
for
both
loss
of
consortium
and
contumelia
as
a
result
of
the
affair.

Her
husband
now
lives
with
Chitopota,
she
says
in
papers
before
the
High
Court.

In
response
to
the
lawsuit,
Chitopota
filed
a
motion
to
dismiss,
claiming
that
the
magistrate
had
effectively
condoned
the
affair
and
that
the
issues
raised
are
no
longer
actionable
due
to
the
passage
of
time.

Chitopota
argued
that
Simon
Mupindu
should
be
included
in
the
lawsuit.
Alternatively,
she
said
Sandra
Mupindu
became
aware
of
their
relationship
in
2014,
and
as
such
the
statute
of
limitations
prevented
her
from
suing
her.

Chitopota
also
contended
that
customary
compensation
had
been
paid
to
both
her
family
and
herself,
thereby
nullifying
the
need
for
further
claims.

The
magistrate
countered
this
defence,
asserting
that
the
principle
of
prescription
does
not
apply
to
ongoing
wrongs
and
pointing
out
that
the
affair
persisted
even
after
she
initiated
the
legal
proceedings.

Justice
Fatima
Maxwell
of
the
Harare
High
Court
was
asked
to
rule
on
whether
the
application
could
proceed
without
Simon
Mupindu
being
joined
in
the
proceedings,
and
whether
the
application
had
been
filed
out
of
time.

Maxwell
reasoned:
“In
my
view,
the
cause
of
action
for
damages
related
to
adultery
is
established
upon
the
occurrence
of
sexual
intercourse.”

The
judge
noted
that
while
certain
aspects
of
Mupindu’s
claims
were
indeed
time-barred,
the
ongoing
nature
of
the
relationship
meant
that
the
defence
of
prescription
could
not
succeed.

“The
plaintiff’s
assertions
indicate
that
the
sexual
liaison
has
continued
even
after
the
summons
were
issued,
implying
a
lack
of
intent
from
the
defendant
to
cease
such
conduct,”
the
court
noted.

Additionally,
the
judge
ruled
that
the
lawsuit
could
proceed
despite
Chitopota’s
claims
regarding
the
non-joinder
of
Simon
Mupindu
in
the
proceedings.

“No
cause
or
matter
shall
be
defeated
due
to
the
misjoinder
or
non-joinder
of
any
party,”
she
remarked.

In
her
legal
declaration,
Mupindu
detailed
that
Chitopota
began
an
affair
with
her
husband
in
2014,
despite
being
aware
of
the
stable
and
loving
nature
of
their
marriage.

She
states
in
an
affidavit
that
the
affair
directly
led
to
her
husband
moving
out
of
their
shared
home
to
live
with
Chitopota.

The
legal
battle
continues
to
trial.

Bulawayo magistrate charged over alleged abuse of office in inmate release

BULAWAYO

A
provincial
magistrate
stationed
at
Tredgold
Magistrates’
Court
in
Bulawayo
has
been
placed
on
remand
for
allegedly
abusing
her
office
by
unlawfully
releasing
an
inmate
from
custody.

Evia
Matura,
47,
faces
charges
of
criminal
abuse
of
duty.

The
charges
stem
from
events
of
July
2
when
Matura
is
alleged
to
have
unprocedurally
released
Obert
Manduna
from
Khami
Remand
Prison.

The
National
Prosecuting
Authority
says
Matura
had
previously
denied
Manduna
bail
on
June
25
and
there
had
been
no
new
bail
application,
changed
circumstances,
bail
receipt,
or
High
Court
order
authorising
his
release.

Prosecutors
allege
Matura
knowingly
acted
against
her
judicial
duties
“for
the
purpose
of
showing
favour
to
Obert
Manduna,”
leading
to
his
unlawful
release.

She
was
granted
$200
bail
and
ordered
to
report
once
a
fortnight
to
the
Zimbabwe
Anti-Corruption
Commission
(ZACC)..

Zimbabwe’s Supreme Court recognises UK divorce order in case involving banker-turned-bishop

HARARE

In
a
precedent-setting
ruling,
the
Supreme
Court
of
Zimbabwe
has
upheld
the
enforcement
of
a
United
Kingdom
divorce
judgment,
allowing
Pauline
Mutsa
Makoni
to
retain
ownership
of
properties
awarded
to
her
by
an
English
court,
including
the
couple’s
matrimonial
home
in
Harare.

The
judgment
overturns
a
controversial
2023
decision
by
the
High
Court
of
Zimbabwe
that
had
rejected
the
registration
and
enforcement
of
the
foreign
order
on
the
grounds
that
it
was
contrary
to
Zimbabwean
public
policy.

Pauline
Makoni
had
sought
recognition
of
a
divorce
and
financial
settlement
granted
by
the
High
Court
of
Justice
(Family
Division)
in
England
in
December
2014.
Her
former
husband,
Julius
Tawona
Makoni

a
former
CEO
of
NMB
Bank
and
Anglican
Bishop
of
Manicaland

had
opposed
the
application,
arguing
that
the
English
court’s
order
stripped
him
of
his
properties
in
Zimbabwe
and
rendered
him
“homeless,”
which
he
claimed
was
inconsistent
with
local
laws.

However,
the
Supreme
Court
firmly
rejected
that
argument,
declaring
in
its
unanimous
ruling
that
“the
English
Court
applied
equitable
principles
similar
to
those
applicable
in
Zimbabwe,”
and
that
the
award
was
a
direct
consequence
of
Makoni’s
failure
to
make
full
and
frank
disclosure
of
his
assets
during
the
UK
proceedings.

The
couple,
who
were
married
in
Harare
in
1983,
had
lived
in
both
Zimbabwe
and
the
United
Kingdom
over
the
course
of
their
marriage.
They
separated
in
2010,
and
Pauline
filed
for
divorce
in
the
UK
later
that
year.
Following
extensive
proceedings

during
which
both
parties
were
represented
by
“highly
experienced
specialist
solicitors
and
barristers,”
according
to
the
judgment

the
UK
court
issued
a
decree
nisi
in
2013
and
a
final
decree
absolute
on
December
18,
2014.

As
part
of
the
financial
settlement,
the
English
court
awarded
Pauline
the
London
matrimonial
home,
the
Harare
home
at
5
Rietfontein
Close
in
Chisipite,
and
a
stand
in
Chishawasha
Hills.
Julius
Makoni
was
awarded
other
properties
and
offshore
accounts,
including
his
interest
in
the
Cornerstone
Trust
and
shares
in
NMBZ,
which
the
court
found
he
had
attempted
to
conceal.

The
English
court
found
that
Makoni
had
failed
to
disclose
his
full
financial
interests,
which
justified
the
outcome.
It
relied
on
English
matrimonial
law,
notably
the
case
NG
v
SG
(Appeal–Non-Disclosure),
which
states
that
“the
court
must
be
astute
that
a
non-discloser
should
not
be
able
to
procure
a
result
from
his
non-disclosure
better
than
that
which
would
be
ordered
if
the
truth
were
told.”

The
Zimbabwean
Supreme
Court
echoed
this
reasoning,
stating
that
Makoni’s
“material
non-disclosure
constitutes
a
lie.
It
is
a
wrong.
Our
courts
do
not
reward
the
perpetrator
of
a
wrong.”

Makoni
had
preemptively
filed
an
application
in
the
Zimbabwean
High
Court
in
2015
seeking
a
declaration
that
the
UK
judgment
was
unenforceable
in
Zimbabwe

specifically
objecting
to
the
transfer
of
the
Harare
home.
The
High
Court
ruled
in
his
favor
in
March
2023,
finding
that
the
English
court
lacked
jurisdiction
and
that
the
award
was
“contrary
to
public
policy”
because
it
allegedly
left
him
without
a
place
to
live.

But
the
Supreme
Court
found
those
conclusions
to
be
legally
unsound
and
factually
incorrect.

“It
was
a
gross
misdirection
for
the
court
a
quo
to
relate
to
[the
issue
of
jurisdiction],”
wrote
Justice
Samuel
Kudya,
who
delivered
the
judgment.

He
noted
that
Makoni
had
not
challenged
the
English
court’s
jurisdiction
during
the
original
proceedings
and
had,
in
fact,
attempted
to
appeal
the
judgment
there

an
appeal
that
was
later
dismissed
for
failure
to
comply
with
court
conditions.

The
Supreme
Court
held
that
the
High
Court
had
erred
in
entertaining
the
application
for
a
declaratory
order
at
all.

“All
that
the
respondent
(Makoni)
needed
to
do
was
to
bide
his
time
until
the
appellant
(Pauline)
lodged
a
recognition
and
enforcement
application,”
the
Court
said,
adding
that
“the
effect
of
the
application
and
the
order
granted
by
the
court
a
quo
is
that
the
applicant
accepted
and
the
court
a
quo
found
that
only
the
award
of
the
Harare
matrimonial
home
was
contrary
to
public
policy.
The
corollary…
is
that
the
remaining
portions
of
the
order
were
not
contrary
to
public
policy.”

Justice
Kudya
emphasised
that
the
UK
court
had
thoroughly
evaluated
the
property
and
financial
holdings
of
both
parties
and
found
that
Makoni
stood
to
benefit
more
overall

despite
his
complaints.

“The
benefit
that
accrued
to
the
appellant
was
just
under
US$500,000,
while
the
benefit
to
the
respondent
was
much
higher,”
the
court
noted.

It
also
listed
extensive
assets
that
Makoni
retained
or
controlled,
including
shares
in
NMBZ
valued
at
over
US$1.3
million,
properties
in
Zimbabwe
and
the
UK,
and
offshore
accounts
with
“hundreds
of
thousands
of
pounds.”

The
Supreme
Court’s
order
reads
in
part:

>
“(a)
The
final
divorce
order…
confirming
the
decree
nisi
together
with
the
judgment
of
Justice
Richard
Robinson
and
the
financial
order…
be
and
is
hereby
recognised
for
purposes
of
enforcement.

>
(b)
Julius
Tawona
Makoni
shall
sign
all
relevant
documents
to
effect
transfer
of
properties
awarded
to
Pauline
Mutsa
Makoni…
within
7
days
of
this
order,
failing
which
the
Sheriff
is
authorised
to
sign
such
documents
and
effect
such
transfers.

>
(c)
Costs
of
the
transfers
shall
be
borne
by
Julius
Tawona
Makoni.”

Makoni
was
also
ordered
to
pay
the
legal
costs
of
both
applications.

Legal
experts
say
the
case
sets
a
critical
precedent
in
Zimbabwe
for
the
recognition
of
foreign
divorce
judgments
and
financial
orders.
It
confirms
that
Zimbabwean
courts
will
respect
such
rulings
where
the
foreign
court
had
jurisdiction
and
where
the
principles
applied
do
not
violate
domestic
public
policy.

The
court
concluded:
“The
English
law
is
strikingly
similar
to
our
own.
No
injustice
was
therefore
occasioned
to
the
respondent
by
the
application
of
English
law.”

Advocate
Thabani
Mpofu
appeared
for
Pauline
Makoni,
while
Julius
Makoni
was
represented
by
Prof
Welshman
Ncube
and
Advocate
Lewis
Uriri.

Zimbabwe’s spodumene exports surge 30% despite weak lithium prices


23.7.2025


3:15

HARARE
(Reuters)

Zimbabwe’s
exports
of
spodumene
concentrate,
a
lithium-bearing
mineral
essential
for
battery
production,
surged
30%
in
the
first
half
of
2025
despite
weak
global
lithium
prices,
official
statistics
show.

  • Chinese
    firms
    dominate
    Zimbabwe
    lithium
    mining
  • Huayou,
    Sinomine
    are
    building
    Zimbabwe
    lithium
    sulphate
    plants

Africa’s
top
lithium
producer
exported
586,197
metric
tons
of
spodumene
concentrate
between
January
and
June,
compared
to
451,824
metric
tons
during
the
same
period
last
year,
according
to
statistics
from
the
Minerals
Marketing
Corporation
of
Zimbabwe
(MMCZ)
obtained
by
Reuters
on
Monday.

The
Reuters
Daily
Briefing
newsletter
provides
all
the
news
you
need
to
start
your
day. Sign
up here.

Post
published
in:

Business

EU Invests €4.2M to Support Zimbabwe’s National Public Health Institute

The
European
Union
(EU)
has
committed €4.2
million
 to
support
the
establishment
of
Zimbabwe’s
first National
Public
Health
Institute
(NPHI)
,
reinforcing
its
partnership
with
Zimbabwe
in
building
stronger
and
more
resilient
health
systems.

The
four-year
EU-funded
initiative,
implemented
with
the
World
Health
Organization
(WHO),
will
strengthen
Zimbabwe’s
ability
to
prevent,
detect,
and
respond
to
public
health
threats.
Guided
by
the Africa
CDC
Framework
 and
aligned
with
the Global
Gateway
Health
Package
 launched
at
the
6th
EU–AU
Summit,
the
NPHI
will
focus
on
science,
evidence
generation,
and
data-driven
policy
advice
rather
than
direct
service
delivery.

Key
priorities
for
the
NPHI
include:

  • Developing
    national
    strategy
    and
    roadmap
     for
    public
    health;
  • Improving digital
    health
    literacy
     and
    reducing
    the
    public
    health
    skills
    gap;
  • Strengthening disease
    surveillance
    and
    research
    ,
    particularly
    for non-communicable
    diseases
    (NCDs)
     such
    as
    hypertension
    and
    diabetes;
  • Expanding
    Zimbabwe’s
    participation
    in regional
    and
    international
    health
    networks
    .

The
establishment
process
will
be
highly
consultative,
bringing
together
the Ministry
of
Health
and
Child
Care
,
universities,
research
institutes,
and
other
health
partners.
It
will
also
foster
collaboration
with African
and
European
public
health
institutes
 that
have
successfully
implemented
similar
models.

This
support
forms
part
of
the Team
Europe
Initiative
on
National
Public
Health
Institutes
in
Sub-Saharan
Africa
,
contributing
to Sustainable
Development
Goal
3
(Good
Health
and
Well-being)
.
Once
operational,
the
NPHI
is
expected
to
become
a
cornerstone
of
evidence-based
decision-making,
improving
the
health
and
well-being
of
Zimbabweans.

Source:


EU
Invests
€4.2M
to
Support
Zimbabwe’s
National
Public
Health
Institute
|

EEAS

Zimbabwe courts Singapore for direct flights


23.7.2025


3:10

Zimbabwean
Transport
and
Infrastructural
Development
Minister, Felix
Mhona,
held
a
bilateral
meeting
with
the
Minister
of
Transport
of
Singapore, Jeffery
Siow,
on
the
sidelines
of
the
2025
Global
Aviation
and
Maritime
Symposium
in
Singapore.
This
was
to
encourage
flights
linking
Singapore
with
Harare
and
Victoria
Falls.

According
to The
Herald
Zimbabwe
,
Mhona
said
Zimbabwe
and
Singapore
had
reviewed
a
Bilateral
Air
Services
Agreement
in
2014,
as
Air
Zimbabwe
used
to
operate
flights
from
Harare
to
Singapore.

The
Minister
also
shared
recent
developments
on
the
upgrade,
expansion
and
modernisation
of
the
Robert
Gabriel
Mugabe
International
Airport
in
Harare.
He
said
it
now
had
capacity
to
handle
wide-body
aircraft
and
six
million
passengers
annually.

Siow
committed
to
reviewing
the
MoUs
so
the
ministers
could
continue
their
discussions
at
the
International
Civil
Aviation
Organisation
Assembly
scheduled
for
September
2025.

Source:


Zimbabwe
courts
Singapore
for
direct
flights

|
Travel
News

Post
published
in:

Business

Is Shutting Up Part Of The Job? – See Also – Above the Law

Davis
Polk
Associate
Fired
For
Posting
His
Private
Opinions
In
His
Spare
Time:
Should
the
response
be
“Good
on
him”
or
“That’s
what
you
get!”?
Trump
Wants
To
Say
It
To
Alito’s
Face:
Expect
him
to
take
his
executive
order
strategy
all
the
way
to
SCOTUS.
The
No-Spine
Nine
Are
Putting
Their
Heads
In
The
Sand:
Maybe
then
Trump
will
forget
he
has
them
on
the
hook?
The
Bar
Exam
From
The
Comfort
Of
Your
Own
Home?:
Moving
toward
a
remote
bar
means
jumping
some
pretty
big
hurdles.
Home
Sweet
Silicon
Home:
Eversheds
Sutherland
wants
to
set
up
shop
in
Silicon
Valley.