EEOC Allows Unexpected Discrimination Lawsuit Against King & Spalding – Above the Law

Shortly
after
the
Blum
+
Co.
lawsuits
that
strong-armed
firms
like

Gibson
Dunn
and
Morrison
Foerster
to
change
the
wording
of
their
diversity
scholarships
,
waves
of
firms
followed
suit
to
avoid
getting
sued
under
Section
1981
of
the
1866
Civil
Rights
Act.
After
the
initial
fray,
Blum
said
the
mission
was
accomplished
and

didn’t
plan
on
any
more
anti-diversity
suits
.
But
a
new
challenger
approaches
that
could
set
the
tone
for
the
next
phase
of
diversity
retaliation.
King
&
Spalding
better
prepare
themselves.
From

Law360
:

A
straight
white
woman
is
suing
King
&
Spalding
LLP
alleging
discrimination
after
getting
a
rare
green
light
from
the
U.S.
Equal
Employment
Opportunity
Commission,
claiming
she
incurred
“significant
damages”
when
she
was
dissuaded
from
applying
to
a
summer
associate
program
open
only
to
“diverse”
applicants.

In
a
nine-page
complaint
filed
Thursday,
Sarah
Spitalnick
said
she
missed
out
on
a
plum
summer
associate
program
that
paid
$4,135
per
week
at
King
&
Spalding,
solely
because
she
is
“a
white,
heterosexual
adult
female.”

“This
case
is
significant
because
the
[EEOC]
found
reasonable
cause
to
believe
that
King
&
Spalding
violated
the
law,
which
only
occurs
in
about
[2%]
of
complaints,”
Gross
said.
“King
&
Spalding’s
discriminatory
practices
send
a
signal
to
others
that
these
practices
are
acceptable.
Ms.
Spitalnick
hopes
that
her
lawsuit
will
send
a
message
that
discrimination
of
any
kind
is
unacceptable.”


Dissuaded
?
It
would
be
one
thing
if
she
actually
applied
and
was
rejected

then
there
might
be
some
colorable
arguments
for
the
reason
of
her
rejection
being
discriminatory,
but
making
a
loss
of
chance
claim
over
something
you
literally
didn’t
even
apply
for
seems
off.
Gotta
be
honest
though,
getting
a
chunk
of
a
summer
associate
salary
without
even
slogging
through
the
onboarding
process
is
a
sweet
work/life
balance
deal.

Merits
of
this
case
aside,
the
fact
that
the
EEOC
greenlit
this
could
signal
to
other
people
that
they
may
bring
discrimination
lawsuits
against
firms
that
either
rejected
them
or
scared
them
off
with
equity-facing
language
over
the
last
few
years.
Not
a
good
time
for
diversity.


King
&
Spalding
Accused
Of
Anti-White,
Pro-LGBTQ
Bias

[Law360]



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Reese Witherspoon Announces ‘Legally Blonde’ Prequel Series – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Tracy
Bennett/MGM
Pictures)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


I
had
this
crazy
idea
that
the
world
might
want
to
know
the
origin
story
of
Elle
Woods.
So
here
I
am
to
officially
tell
you
the
most
amazing
news
ever,
which
is
that
we’re
going
back
to
high
school
with
Elle.





Reese
Witherspoon
,
famous
for
her
role
as
Elle
Woods
in
the
“Legally
Blonde”
movies,
in

comments
given

concerning
a
new
Prime
Video
prequel
series
titled
“Elle.”
According
to
Witherspoon,
who
will
serve
as
an
executive
producer
on
the
series,
before
Woods
was
the
“most
famous
Gemini
vegetarian
to
graduate
from
Harvard
Law
School,”
she
was
a
“regular
‘90s
high
school
girl.”
The
show
will
focus
on
the
experiences
that
shaped
Woods
and
help
her
to
become
the
lawyer
that
inspired
so
many
legal
careers.
Check
out
Witherspoon’s
in
character
announcement,
below.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Amid Zimbabwe’s Mass Exodus, Meet the Doctors and Nurses Who Stayed Behind



By
Gamuchirai
Masiyiwa,
Global
Press
Zimbabwe


HARARE,
ZIMBABWE

At
five
months
pregnant
with
her
second
child,
Vimbai
started
bleeding.
She
suspected
a
miscarriage
and
rushed
to
a
public
clinic
for
help.
The
attending
midwife
didn’t
examine
her,
says
Vimbai,
who
chose
to
use
her
middle
name
for
fear
of
stigma.
“The
only
thing
they
did
was
[give]
me
cotton
wool.”


To
Vimbai’s
shock,
the
midwife
wrote
“attempted
abortion”
on
her
consultation
card
and
referred
her
to
the
nearest
public
hospital
about
20
kilometers
away
(nearly
12.5
miles).
But
Vimbai
was
in
too
much
pain
to
make
it
all
the
way.
“I
thought
I
was
going
to
die.”


A
friend
recommended
a
nearby
clinic
operating
illegally
in
someone’s
home.
“I
had
a
conviction
that
this
was
the
only
immediate
option,”
she
says.


Although
the
bed
was
uncomfortable,
the
home
clinic
was
well
equipped.
There
was
a
drip
stand,
boxes
with
cannulas,
drugs
and
medical
supplies
stored
in
a
tiny
spare
bedroom.
The
setup
surprised
Vimbai.
There
were
other
patients
too.
Their
murmurs
seeped
through
the
walls.
Somewhere,
a
child
coughed.
Vimbai
also
noticed
something
else.
She
knew
the
nurse
who
operated
the
backyard
clinic.
He
worked
as
a
midwife
at
the
public
clinic
where
she
had
been
first
treated
after
the
bleeding
incident.
To
Vimbai,
this
meant
he
was
qualified.
It
reassured
her
a
little.


They
confirmed
she
was
having
a
miscarriage,
put
her
on
intravenous
therapy
along
with
some
injections
and
he
cleaned
her
womb,
she
says.
Overall,
the
experience
was
friendlier,
and
the
midwife
followed
up
afterward.


“The
hideout
clinics
are
saving
a
lot
of
people
in
the
communities
[where]
we
live,”
she
adds.


Zimbabwe’s
health
care
system
has
been
crumbling
under
the
strain
of
years
of
economic
and
political
instability,
which
started
in
the
late
1990s.
Health
worker
salaries
have
not
been
spared
by
inflation
and
currency
challenges.


As
a
result,
many
professionals
have
migrated
to
seek
better
opportunities
abroad.
In
2019,
the
United
Kingdom’s
National
Health
Service
employed
4,049
Zimbabwean
health
care
professionals,
including
doctors,
nurses
and
clinical
support
staff,
making
Zimbabwe
the
second-largest
African
contributor
to
its
workforce
after
Nigeria,
according
to
a
statement
provided
to
Global
Press
Journal
by
Zimbabwe’s
Health
Service
Commission
spokesperson,
Tryfine
Rachel
Dzvukutu.


But
not
everyone
leaves.


In
late
2022,
the
country
had
1,724
doctors
and
17,245
nurses,
Dzvukutu
says,
serving
a
population
of
over
15
million.


These
doctors
and
nurses
grapple
with
various
challenges,
among
them
poor
salaries
and
high
workloads.
To
navigate
this,
some
take
part-time
jobs
in
other
health
centers
while
others
operate
illegal
clinics
such
as
the
one
Vimbai
visited.


“Sometimes
we
resort
to
these
hideout
clinics
not
because
we
want
to
but
because
of
the
service
we
get
at
the
public
facilities,”
Vimbai
says,
her
voice
tinged
with
discontent.


A
moral
dilemma


Gladys,
who
has
been
a
health
worker
for
20
years
and
asked
to
use
only
her
first
name
for
fear
of
retribution,
says
that
sometimes
she
offers
services
to
people
in
her
community
outside
of
work,
especially
those
who
might
need
minor
assistance,
such
as
dressing
wounds.


“I
do
charge
for
rendering
that
service,”
she
says.
The
cost
ranges
from
10
United
States
dollars
or
more
per
week,
depending
on
what
patients
can
afford.
In
comparison,
the
clinic
where
she
works
charges
1
dollar
a
day
for
minor
services
such
as
wound
dressing.
But
Gladys
says
her
fees
are
typically
lower
than
the
overall
costs
a
patient
would
incur,
including
transportation.
Other
times,
she
says
she
doesn’t
charge
if
she
sees
that
the
person
cannot
afford
to
pay.


There
has
been
an
increase
in
these
practices,
even
though
it
is
illegal,
says
Simbarashe
James
Tafirenyika,
president
of
the
Zimbabwe
Municipalities
Nurses
and
Allied
Workers
Union.
It’s
also
unethical,
since
the
workers
offering
these
services
don’t
have
sterile
equipment
or
other
necessities,
which
is
risky,
he
adds.


The
Health
Professions
Act
prohibits
health
institutions
from
operating
without
registration.
Doing
so
is
an
offense
liable
to
a
fine,
imprisonment
up
to
two
years
or
both.


(Gamuchirai
Masiyiwa/Global
Press
Journal)


Gladys
doesn’t
think
she
is
bending
the
rules
or
posing
any
additional
risks
to
patients;
if
they
visit
the
clinic,
she
is
still
the
same
person
who
will
assist
them,
she
says.
However,
she
says
those
who
operate
more
robust
backyard
clinics
put
people
at
high
risk
due
to
a
lack
of
sterilized
equipment.
It
is
a
criminal
offense,
she
says,
given
the
potentially
fatal
consequences,
such
as
bleeding
to
death
following
an
abortion.


Rueben
Akili
is
a
program
officer
with
the
Combined
Harare
Residents
Association,
an
organization
that
advocates
for
the
rights
of
residents.
He
confirms
health
care
workers
are
operating
illegal
clinics
in
various
high-density
suburbs
of
Harare.


“It
is
an
issue
which
we
have
noticed
for
the
past
five
years
due
to
the
continuous
deterioration
of
health
service
provision.
They
offer
a
range
of
services
such
as
maternal
health
care
provision,
treating
of
sexually
related
diseases
and
to
some
extent
general
health
care,”
he
says.
He
sees
it
as
a
worrying
trend
as
it
puts
people’s
lives
in
danger.


In
a
written
response
to
Global
Press
Journal,
Stanley
Gama,
the
head
of
corporate
communications
for
Harare
City
Council,
says
the
council
isn’t
aware
of
illegal
clinics
but
will
carry
out
investigations
and
enforce
the
law.
He
adds
that
health
workers,
like
every
citizen
in
Zimbabwe,
haven’t
been
spared
by
the
challenges
of
the
struggling
economy.


Extra
shifts


Gladys
says
her
salary
at
the
public
clinic
where
she
works
is
low.
In
March,
the
government
paid
her
6
million
Zimbabwean
dollars
(about
195
US
dollars).
(At
the
time
Global
Press
Journal
interviewed
sources
for
this
article,
the
Zimbabwean
dollar
was
still
the
standard
currency
in
Zimbabwe.
The
country
has
since
transitioned
to
a
new
currency,
called
Zimbabwean
gold.)
Gladys
also
receives
an
allowance
of
112
US
dollars.
The
total
amount
she
receives
varies
each
month
depending
on
the
exchange
rate.


To
make
ends
meet,
Gladys
takes
extra
shifts
or
works
as
a
substitute
nurse
at
private
institutions.
She
prefers
shifts
at
private
institutions.
The
government
clinic
pays
her
4
US
dollars
for
a
full
day
of
work,
from
7
a.m.
to
7
p.m.,
and
converts
the
payment
to
local
currency
at
the
prevailing
exchange
rate.
The
government
also
taxes
this
overtime
pay.
But
the
private
health
facilities
pay
her
more
money
for
fewer
hours,
at
20
US
dollars
for
a
day
that
ends
at
4:30
p.m.


While
extra
work
means
more
money,
Gladys
is
always
exhausted.
She
ends
up
working
about
53
hours
per
week,
well
above
the
recommended
45
hours
for
health
care
workers.


“The
body
needs
to
rest.
When
you
get
home,
all
you
want
to
do
is
sleep

you
can’t
do
things
that
you
would
normally
do
like
cooking,
assisting
your
child
with
homework.
We
are
overwhelmed,”
says
the
mother
of
two.
Her
social
life
suffers
too.


She
knows
colleagues
who
have
quit
the
public
clinic
to
work
in
private
institutions
and
others
who
have
immigrated
abroad.
Around
2017
and
2018,
the
public
clinic
had
22
midwives,
she
says.
Now,
it
has
14.


She
considered
leaving
Zimbabwe
for
better
opportunities
abroad,
but
when
she
wanted
to
start
the
process,
the
government
stopped
issuing
certificates
of
good
standing.
Without
one,
she
would
only
be
able
to
work
as
a
care
worker,
which
pays
less
than
a
professional
nurse.


GAMUCHIRAI
MASIYIWA,
GPJ
ZIMBABWE
As
Zimbabwe’s
health
care
crisis
worsens
with
a
mass
migration
of
health
care
workers
in
search
of
better
opportunities
and
low
pay
for
those
who
remain,
Gladys
occasionally
takes
on
extra
shifts
at
her
workplace
or
in
private
clinics.


The
solution
for
Gladys
is
for
the
government
to
employ
more
workers
and
offer
better
pay.


Although
health
care
workers
left
behind
like
Gladys
are
finding
solutions

sometimes
illegal

to
navigate
the
challenges
of
a
crumbling
health
care
system,
these
arrangements
are
unsustainable,
says
Tafirenyika,
the
union
president.
“What
they
are
doing
is
bad
and
we
do
not
recommend
it
at
all,
but
they
are
looking
for
survival
skills,”
he
says.
He
blames
the
local
councils,
which
employ
public
health
workers.
The
solution,
he
says,
is
to
ensure
an
adequate
health
care
workforce
and
offer
them
good
pay.


Gama
says
the
Harare
City
Council
has
been
recruiting
more
health
workers.
He
did
not
provide
any
figures.


Enock
Dongo,
president
of
the
Zimbabwe
Nurses
Association,
agrees
Zimbabwe’s
health
workers
are
overwhelmed.
The
union
is
pushing
the
government
to
improve
health
workers’
pay
and
welfare,
he
says.


“It’s
not
only
money
that
can
solve
the
issues
we
are
facing,
but
there
are
also
many
non-monetary
benefits
that
they
can
provide
like
housing,
land,
farms,
among
others,”
he
says.


Side
gigs


Although
some
health
workers
operate
illegal
clinics
or
take
extra
shifts
to
sustain
their
livelihood,
others
take
up
side
gigs.
Moyo,
who
prefers
to
use
his
clan
totem
for
fear
of
retribution,
is
a
nurse
at
a
public
hospital
in
Harare.
He
says
his
low
pay
gives
him
sleepless
nights.
It
is
so
low
that
he
couldn’t
add
his
fourth
child
to
his
medical
insurance.
“I
was
told
that
my
income
was
too
low
to
have
another
dependent
added
on
my
insurance.
I
can’t
even
afford
health
care
for
my
child,”
he
says.


In
February,
his
salary
inclusive
of
allowances
was
3.6
million
Zimbabwean
dollars
(163
US
dollars)
plus
a
foreign
currency
component
of
270
US
dollars.


According
to
the
latest
Zimbabwe
Statistical
Agency
report
on
poverty,
the
minimum
monthly
income
needed
in
March
for
one
person
stood
at
916,255.50
Zimbabwean
dollars
(41.54
US
dollars).
A
family
of
six
requires
about
249
US
dollars
for
food
and
non-food
items
to
be
above
the
poverty
line.


Like
Gladys,
Moyo
tried
taking
extra
shifts
at
private
clinics.
He
says
lately
they
have
been
hard
to
come
by.
“Because
of
the
economic
situation
in
our
country,
the
private
health
institutions
are
not
getting
as
many
clients
as
they
used
to,”
he
says.


In
2023,
he
registered
a
consulting
agency
to
assist
students
with
their
applications
to
private
nursing
schools
in
Zambia.
“If
I
enroll
10
students,
I
get
20%
commission.
But
because
my
company
is
fairly
new,
last
year
I
managed
to
enroll
three
students
and
I
was
paid
200
[US
dollars],”
he
says.


Despite
the
challenges,
Moyo
still
wants
to
advance
in
his
career.
“I
recently
completed
my
bachelor’s
degree
in
nursing
science,
majoring
in
training,
because
I
have
a
passion
to
teach.
And
if
conditions
of
service
improve,
I
intend
to
work
in
a
nursing
school
locally,”
he
says.


Although
he
could
have
relocated,
he
had
someone
close
to
him
who
was
not
well
and
he
chose
to
stay.
Home
is
best,
he
says.
But
those
who
leave
are
simply
forced
by
circumstances.


This
story
was



originally
published


by
Global
Press
Journal



https://globalpressjournal.com/africa/zimbabwe/amid-zimbabwes-mass-exodus-meet-doctors-nurses-stayed-behind/
 



Global
Press
is
an
award-winning
international
news
publication
with
more
than
40
independent
news
bureaus
across
Africa,
Asia
and
Latin
America.

Post
published
in:

Featured

Law Professor Dies In Tragic Triple Homicide – Above the Law

We
have
some
incredibly
unfortunate
news
to
report
from
Mississippi,
where
a
law
professor
was
shot
and
killed
alongside
her
mother
and
sister
in
a
triple
homicide.

Crystal
Lynn
Welch,
42,
was
an
associate
clinical
law
professor
at
the
Mississippi
College
School
of
Law,
where
she
worked
as
supervising
attorney
for
the
Family
and
Children’s
Law
Center.
A
lifelong
social
justice
advocate,
in
2020,
she
led
a
team
to
successfully
replace
the
state’s
Confederate-themed
flag
with
a
new
one.
Welch
also
served
as
the
board
president
for
the
American
Civil
Liberties
Union
of
Mississippi
and
as
vice
president
of
the
board
of
directors
for
the
Mississippi
Free
Press.

The

Mississippi
Clarion
Ledger

has
additional
details
on
her
tragic
death:

On
Sunday,
which
was
Mother’s
Day,
the
Ridgeland
Police
Department
found
three
people
dead
inside
a
Ridgeland
home.

[Ridgeland
Police
Chief
Brian]
Myers
said
officers
received
a
call
from
family
members
around
3:30
p.m.
Sunday
regarding
the
welfare
of
the
occupants
at
a
home
in
the
7100
block
of
Old
Canton
Road.

Upon
arrival,
[Myers]
said
law
enforcement
found
42-year-old
Crystal
Lynn
Welch,
56-year-old
Vicky
Renee
Welch
and
76-year-old
Ida
Thomas
Welch
deceased
in
the
living
room.
The
three
victims
all
had
been
“shot
to
death
in
the
home.”

The
suspect,
Ivory
James
Welch
III,
was
Ida’s
son
and
Crystal
and
Vicky’s
brother.
According
to
Mississippi
police,
he
made
it
to
Arizona
before
he
was
confronted
by
state
troopers.
When
they
tried
to
arrest
Welch,
he
reportedly
began
shooting
and
was
fatally
wounded
in
the
gunfight.

In
a
statement,
Mississippi
Law
said
the
following
of
Welch’s
untimely
passing:
“It
is
with
profound
sadness
that
the
Mississippi
College
and
School
of
Law
family
mourns
the
passing
of
Crystal
Welch,
Associate
Clinical
Professor
at
the
Mississippi
College
School
of
Law.
The
thoughts
and
prayers
of
our
leadership,
faculty,
staff,
and
students
are
with
Crystal’s
family
in
this
difficult
time.”

Donna
Ladd,
editor
and
CEO
of
the

Mississippi
Free
Press
,
said
Welch’s
death
“is
a
severe
loss
to
our
state.”
She
continued,
adding,
“She
was
a
force
of
nature
and
totally
dedicated
to
helping
Mississippi
reach
its
full
potential
as
an
equitable
and
kind
state
for
all
our
residents.”

We
here
at
Above
the
Law
would
like
to
extend
our
condolences
to
Crystal
Lynn
Welch’s
family,
friends,
and
colleagues
during
this
extremely
difficult
time.

If
you’re
a
victim
of
familial
or
domestic
violence,
reach
out
if
you
need
help,
before
it’s
too
late.
If
you
feel
that
you
are
in
immediate
danger,
please
call
the

National
Domestic
Violence
Hotline
 at
1-800-799-SAFE
(7233).
Assistance
is
available
in
English
and
Spanish.


Crystal
Welch,
MFP
Board
Vice
President,
Dies
in
Ridgeland
Triple
Homicide;
Suspect
Killed

[Mississippi
Free
Press]

Suspect
connected
to
triple
homicide
in
Ridgeland
dies
after
gunfight
with
police

[Mississippi
Clarion
Ledger]

Clinical
law
prof
who
worked
for
social
justice
killed
in
triple
murder

[ABA
Journal]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

When Is It Appropriate To Work For Free? – Above the Law

The
legal
job
market
can
be
tough
for
new
graduates,
especially
for
those
who
do
not
attend
the
favored
law
schools.
Due
to
this,
some
people
are
thinking
about
working
for
free,
hoping
it
will
give
them
a
leg
up.
They
may
have
an
anecdote
or
two
about
someone
who
became
successful
by
initially
offering
to
work
for
free.

Under
the
right
circumstances,
working
for
free
can
get
your
foot
in
the
door,
help
you
gain
connections
and
trust
with
the
right
people,
and
provide
entry-level
experience.
On
the
other
hand,
you
could
be
perceived
as
needy,
unemployable,
and
desperate.
And
some
employers
will
only
have
you
do
menial
or
nonsensical
tasks.

Unpaid
work
is
a
controversial
subject,
particularly
in
recent
years.
In
many
states,
unpaid
work

even
if
volunteered

is
illegal
with
a
few
exceptions,
such
as
school
internships.
But
in
reality,
some
people
will
do
it
anyway,
usually
on
an
informal
basis.

For
those
who
are
going
to
do
free
work
whether
legally
or
on
the
down
low,
take
the
following
precautions
to
minimize
the
chances
of
being
exploited
with
nothing
to
show
for
it.

First,
try
to
obtain
internship
credit
at
your
school.
Or
get
independent
study
credit
if
your
school
allows
this.
This
seems
simple
enough
and,
if
approved,
employers
will
feel
a
lot
better
about
hiring
you.
But
some
law
schools
only
provide
free
internship
credit
for
government
or
nonprofit
work
and
not
for
private
law
firms,
usually
citing
legal
reasons
or
fearing
student
backlash.

Second,
if
you
are
going
to
work
for
free,
work
for
someone
you
know
or
respect.
That
person
should
also
respect
your
time
and
treat
you
accordingly.

Third,
you
should
be
allowed
to
list
your
work
and
the
firm’s
(or
company’s)
name
on
your
resume.
Some
firms
do
not
allow
this,
usually
in
situations
where
someone
is
secretly
working
for
one
of
the
partners
(or
even
an
associate).

Lastly,
work
only
for
as
long
as
you
need
to.
You
should
be
enjoying
your
work
or
learning
from
it.
If
there
is
nothing
to
do,
you
should
be
allowed
to
leave.
Most
importantly,
scut
work
should
not
be
tolerated.
By
working
for
free,
you
are
already
“paying
your
dues.”
Menial
work
might
be
appropriate
if
everyone
in
the
office
also
puts
in
their
share.

Next,
I
have
some
thoughts
for
employers
who
are
interested
in
getting
free
help.

First,
call
your
colleagues
practicing
plaintiff-side
employment
law
and
ask
them
three
questions:
(1)
what
their
contingency
fee
was
for
unpaid
labor
cases,
(2)
their
state
government’s
fines
and
penalties
for
unpaid
wage
violations,
and
(3)
how
some
employees
have
caused
financial
headaches
for
their
employers
by
taking
advantage
of
employment
and
workers’
compensation
laws.
Hopefully
the
large
numbers
and
horror
stories
will
make
you
think
twice
before
accepting
free
labor.

Second,
check
your
state’s
minimum
wage
and
payroll
taxes.
If
you
do
some
calculations,
it
is
possible
that
the
cost
of
paying
someone
is
not
as
high
as
you
think.

Third,
if
you
are
not
going
to
pay
even
minimum
wage,
at
least
buy
them
food
and
reimburse
them
for
gas.
They
should
not
lose
money
by
volunteering.

Ideally,
all
work
should
be
paid,
even
if
the
person
doing
the
work
has
no
experience.
But
some
people
will
volunteer
to
work
for
free
in
exchange
for
the
experience.
While
free
help
is
tempting,
employers
should
not
accept
it
even
if
it
is
volunteered.
The
legal
risks
highly
outweigh
the
benefits.




Steven
Chung
is
a
tax
attorney
in
Los
Angeles,
California.
He
helps
people
with
basic
tax
planning
and
resolve
tax
disputes.
He
is
also
sympathetic
to
people
with
large
student
loans.
He
can
be
reached
via
email
at




stevenchungatl@gmail.com
.
Or
you
can
connect
with
him
on
Twitter
(
@stevenchung)
and
connect
with
him
on 
LinkedIn.

Trump Defense Team Playing Tiddlywinks At A Chess Match – Above the Law

(Photo
by
ROBYN
BECK/AFP
via
Getty
Images)

Having
called
Stormy
Daniels
a
liar
repeatedly
in
its
opening,
the
Trump
defense
team
was
then
shocked
and
appalled
that
the
prosecution
elicited
testimony
to
rehabilitate
her
credibility.
The
hits
didn’t
stop
there
as
they
attempted
to
get
out
of
the
mess
they’d
landed
in
by

sex
shaming
someone
whose
sexuality
is
their
whole
business
.
Trump
lawyers
do
a
lot
better
when

the
judge
is
running
their
defense
.
Meanwhile,
an
organization
moved
to
preemptively
pare
down
Trump’s
SCOTUS
shortlist
to

the
least
qualified,
worst
behaved
candidates

and
its
been
a
very

Ponzi-rific

week

for
one
Biglaw
firm
.

The Best Law Schools In The World (2024) – Above the Law

Hump
Day
is
finally
here,
and
we’ve
got
just
what
every
lawyer
and
law
student
wants
to
see
to
get
them
through
the
rest
of
the
week:
a
ranking
of
the
best
law
schools
in
the
world.

Move
over
U.S.
News,
because
we’re
about
to
go
global.

Before
we
get
to
the

World
Law
School
Rankings
,
let’s
take
a
look
at
the
methodology
used
by
the
Quacquarelli
Symonds
team
at
Top
Universities.
Researchers
analyzed
schools’
academic
reputations,
employer
reputations,
research
citations
per
paper,
H-indices,
and
international
research
networks.
You
can
explore
more
in-depth
explanations

here

if
you’re
interested.

We
know
you
want
to
see
if
any
American
law
schools
made
it,
so
we
won’t
keep
you
waiting.
Here
are
the
top
10
best
law
schools
in
the
world:

  1. Harvard
    University
  2. University
    of
    Oxford
  3. University
    of
    Cambridge
  4. Yale
    University
  5. Stanford
    University
  6. New
    York
    University
  7. London
    School
    of
    Economics
    and
    Political
    Science
  8. Columbia
    University
  9. University
    of
    California,
    Berkeley
  10. University
    of
    Melbourne

USA!
USA!
USA!
More
than
half
of
the
world’s
top
10
law
schools
are
in
America!
In
fact,
almost
half
of
the
T14
is
represented
here.
Unlike
in
the
U.S.
News
rankings,
Harvard
continues
to
reign
supreme,
beating
Yale
and
Stanford
in
this
worldwide
law
school
ranking.
Harvard
is

still
 the
most
elite
law
school
on
the
planet.

Farther
down
the
list,
but
still
within
the
top
25
law
schools
in
the
world,
you’ll
see
Chicago
(#11),
UCLA
(#19),
and
Georgetown
(#23).
Going
deeper,
but
still
within
the
top
50
law
schools
in
the
world,
you’ll
find
Penn
(#29),
Duke
(#30),
Cornell
(#34),
Michigan
(tied
at
#36),
and
UVA
(#50).

Also
representing
for
America
in
the
top
100
law
schools
in
the
world
Northwestern
(tied
at
#68),
UT-Austin
(#79),
American
(tied
at
#85),
GW
(tied
at
#89),
and
BU
(tied
at
#92).
Still
within
the
top
150
law
schools,
we
find
UC
Davis,
UC
Irvine,
Notre
Dame,
and
Washington.
It’s
great
that
so
many
U.S.
law
schools
are
ranked
so
highly
on
a
global
scale.

What
do
you
think
about
these
worldly
law
school
rankings?
Congratulate
or
condemn
your
alma
mater

but
be
careful,
the
world
is
watching.


QS
World
University
Rankings
by
Subject
2024

Law
&
Legal
Studies

[Top
Universities]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Elon Musk Threatening Biglaw Firm To Silence Amicus Brief? – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Apu
Gomes/Getty
Images)

A
couple
years
back,

Elon
Musk
threatened
to
drop
Cooley
LLP

unless
they
fired
a
newly
hired
associate
who
had
just
joined
from
the
SEC.
Cooley
responded
with
a
resounding
“nope.”
Alas,
Musk
might
not
have
learned
his
lesson
from
this
incident,
as

a
new
filing
in
Delaware
Chancery

alleges
that
Musk,
acting
through
Tesla,
leaned
on
Holland
&
Knight
to

halt
a
renowned
professor
from
filing
an
amicus
brief
.

Professor
Charles
Elson
sought
to
provide
additional
insight
on
Delaware
corporate
law
in
the
ongoing
fight
over
Tesla’s
plan
to
hand
Musk
personally
$56
billion

a
waste
of
corporate
value
that

Tesla’s
meme
stock
investors
confuse
for
a
brilliant
move
.
The
court
already
rejected
that
payment,
but
now
Tesla
is
trying
to
use
a
shareholder
vote
to
overcome
the
Delaware
ruling,
something
that
Professor
Elson
notes
is
“unprecedented,”
which
is
a
more
professional
phrasing
for
“utterly
bonkers.”

Elson
previously
filed
an
amicus
brief
in
the
first
phase
of
the
case
without
incident,
but
when
the
opinion
rejecting
the
pay
package
cited
Elson’s
brief
repeatedly,
Elson
says
Tesla
suddenly
conjured
up
objections
to
his
further
participation.

After
Tesla’s
attorneys
at
DLA
Piper
suggested
that
Elson
had
some
newfound
conflict
of
interest,
Elson
says
he
heard
from
Holland
&
Knight,
where
Elson
enjoyed
a
nearly
30-year
consulting
arrangement:

Soon
after,
Professor
Elson
received
an
email
from
Holland
&
Knight
LLP,
a
law
firm
with
which
Professor
Elson
had
a
consulting
relationship.
Holland
&
Knight
informed
Professor
Elson
that
the
firm
represents
Tesla
in
certain
unrelated
matters
and
that
Tesla
had
threatened
to
fire
Holland
&
Knight
if
Professor
Elson
submitted
this
amicus
brief.

Elson
responded
to
this
by
just
resigning
his
consultancy.
For
its
part,
Holland
&
Knight
told
Reuters:

Holland
&
Knight
denied
in
an
email
statement
that
it
was
pressured
by
Tesla.
“Holland
&
Knight
determined
that
Charles
Elson’s
proposed
course
of
action
was
inconsistent
with
the
firm’s
obligations
to
its
client,
Tesla,”
the
statement
said.
“This
determination
was
not
based
on
any
coercion
or
threats
by
anyone,
including
Tesla.”

It
was
“inconsistent
with
the
firm’s
obligations”
but
only
the

second

time
he
penned
an
amicus
brief?
So
is
Holland
&
Knight
admitting
that
it
was
in
breach
of
these
“firm
obligations”
when
Elson
filed
his
first
brief?

Seems
like
a
weird
admission.


Tesla
threatened
to
fire
law
firm
in
bid
to
block
Musk
pay
critic

court
document

[Reuters]


Earlier
:

Biglaw
Firm
Chooses
Associate
Over
Elon
Musk


Elon
Musk
Supporters
Bombard
Judge
With
Angry
Letters

She’s
Not
Even
Opening
Them


HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

The Recipe For A Winning 20-Year Class Reunion: Make It Cheap, Local To The School, And Informal – Above the Law

I
just
had
my
20-year
high
school
class
reunion.
It
was
a
blast.

In
the
days
leading
up
to
this
class
reunion,
I
casually
mentioned
to
many
people
who
weren’t
in
my
high
school
class
that
it
was
coming
up.
There
were
basically
three
reactions:

  • “I
    have
    never
    been
    to
    one
    of
    my
    class
    reunions
    and
    don’t
    see
    any
    reason
    why
    I
    would
    start
    going
    to
    them
    now.”
  • “I
    went
    to
    my
    10-year
    reunion,
    and
    it
    sucked,
    so
    I’m
    never
    going
    to
    another
    one.”
  • “My
    class
    does
    not
    have
    reunions.
    The
    class
    president
    grew
    up
    to
    be
    a
    [drug
    addict/convicted
    pedophile/intolerable
    snob]
    and
    I
    guess
    no
    one
    ever
    bothered
    to
    take
    over
    planning
    for
    one.”

These
are
all
pretty
understandable.
Still,
you
should
go
to
your
class
reunion.
Even
if
you
did
hate
everyone
in
high
school,
don’t
you
think
after
a
decade
or
two
it’s
maybe
time
to
give
some
of
them
another
chance
for
like
two
to
three
hours?

Despite

the
skyrocketing
rates
of
loneliness
in
our
society
,
it
is,
counterintuitively,
becoming
harder
and
harder
to
get
individuals
to
show
up
to
in-person
events.
I’m
not
going
to
figure
out
that
whole
issue
in
the
next
few
paragraphs.
What
I
can
give
you
are
a
few
simple
rules
that,
properly
executed,
will
prevent
your
class
reunion
from
becoming
a
tedious
chore
that
no
one
shows
up
for.

First,
make
it
cheap.
No
one,
other
than
perhaps
someone
who
got
rich
and
really
would
like
to
show
it
off
(and
who
you
don’t
really
want
there
anyway),
wants
to
pay
to
go
to
a
class
reunion.
Hold
the
reunion
at
a
bar
that
has
food,
and
if
people
want
to
buy
their
own
food,
they
can.
By
keeping
it
cheap,
you’re
removing
a
big
barrier
for
people.
It’s
probably
not
even
an
issue
of
affordability,
it’s
more
of
a
mental
barrier
that
you
don’t
need,
in
that
it
rubs
people
the
wrong
way
to
have
to
pay
to
hang
out
with
their
former
classmates
who
they
hung
out
with
for
free
for
years.

Yes,
by
20
years
into
adulthood,
you
will
have
some
folks
who
have
quit
drinking
(we
had
several)
and
they
can
take
advantage
of
all
the
soft
drinks
and
nonalcoholic
snacks
available
at
a
bar.
There
will
be
far
more
people
who
will
want
a
drink
and
will
show
up
to
a
bar
than
there
will
be
people
who
would
show
up
at
some
kind
of
nondrinking
family-friendly
event.
You
can
also
typically
get
free
use
of
a
party
room
at
a
bar
by
calling
in
and
telling
them
you’d
like
to
bring
50-plus
extra
people
to
spend
money
at
their
business
on
the
night
of
your
reunion.
If
the
bar
tries
to
charge
you
extra
for
the
side
room,
you
are
looking
at
too
nice
of
a
bar.

Second,
hold
the
reunion
in
the
town
where
the
school
you
actually
graduated
from
is
(or
was).
People
will
travel
to
go
to
a
class
reunion
(we
had
a
bunch
of
folks
from
out-of-state)
but
they
really
don’t
want
to
have
to
get
a
hotel
room
when
they
get
there.
In
the
town
everyone
graduated
from,
many
will
still
live
there,
a
bunch
will
still
have
parents
who
live
there,
and
almost
everyone
will
at
least
have
the
parents
of
a
close
friend
who
still
live
there.
People
can
pool
babysitting
by
keeping
it
local,
and
can
get
back
to
their
kids
at
a
reasonable
hour.
If
you
make
the
mistake
of
moving
the
reunion
to
a
nearby
city
or
suburb
thinking
you
are
making
it
more
convenient,
no
one
will
show
up.

Third,
keep
it
informal.
No
ties,
no
ballgowns,
no
costumes;
leave
that
bullshit
to
the
weirdo
celebrities

at
The
Met
Gala
.
Your
high
school
classmates
don’t
care
what
anyone
else
is
wearing
20
years
after
graduation.
Everyone
would
prefer
to
be
comfortable
than
to
rehash
prom.

Make
it
easy
for
people
to
attend,
and
they
will
reward
you
with
their
company.
Consider
a
counterexample.

The
morning
of
my
20-year
reunion,
I
ran
a
local
marathon
with
a
good
friend.
We
planned
it
for
that
day,
having
both
been
class
officers,
and
knowing
that
several
other
people
from
our
class
were
distance
runners
who
might
also
be
interested
in
running
the
race.
We
did
have
a
handful
of
marathon
entrants
from
the
Class
of
’04

one
even
placed
in
the
women’s
division

but
about
20
times
as
many
people
came
to
the
party
where
all
you
had
to
do
was
show
up
at
the
predesignated
bar
in
your
hometown
at
a
given
time.

Don’t
make
things
more
difficult
than
they
have
to
be.
If
your
former
classmates
know
in
advance
that
the
20-year
reunion
is
going
to
be
cheap,
local,
and
informal,
far
more
of
them
are
going
to
show
up.
And
when
you
have
that
critical
mass
of
attendees,
well,
it’ll
be
just
like
old
times.




Jonathan
Wolf
is
a
civil
litigator
and
author
of 
Your
Debt-Free
JD



(affiliate
link).
He
has
taught
legal
writing,
written
for
a
wide
variety
of
publications,
and
made
it
both
his
business
and
his
pleasure
to
be
financially
and
scientifically
literate.
Any
views
he
expresses
are
probably
pure
gold,
but
are
nonetheless
solely
his
own
and
should
not
be
attributed
to
any
organization
with
which
he
is
affiliated.
He
wouldn’t
want
to
share
the
credit
anyway.
He
can
be
reached
at 
jon_wolf@hotmail.com.

Business School And Law School Should Not Be Compared – Above the Law

Recently,
I
was
at
a
reception
with
people
who
work
in
business
and
finance.
Many
of
the
attendees
earned
MBA
degrees,
and
people
discussed
their
educational
backgrounds,
including
their
experiences
attending
business
school,
while
engaging
in
small
talk
at
the
event.
At
one
point,
one
of
the
MBA
graduates
tried
to
liken
business
school
to
law
school
in
order
to
express
commonality
with
the
fact
that
I
had
a
law
degree.
Although
I
entertained
this
notion
for
a
while
to
be
polite,
it
should
be
apparent
to
anyone
that
law
school
and
business
school
are
extremely
different,
and
earning
an
MBA
and
a
law
degree
should
not
be
compared.

Perhaps
the
biggest
reason
why
law
school
and
business
school
are
not
similar
is
since
law
school
is
a
barrier
to
entry
to
becoming
a
lawyer
whereas
the
business
world
does
not
really
have
hard
and
fast
barriers.
Indeed,
most
states
require
graduation
from
law
school
to
be
eligible
to
sit
for
the
bar
exam.
There
is
no
such
barrier
to
entry
to
entering
the
world
of
business.
Anyone
can
learn
on
the
job
and
be
promoted
regardless
of
whether
they
attended
business
school.
Sure,
business
school
can
help
job
candidates
earn
jobs
and
be
promoted
(this
definitely
helped
Ryan
in
“The
Office”),
but
few
jobs
in
the
business
world
are
closed
off
completely
because
someone
does
not
have
an
MBA.

Moreover,
the
dynamics
of
law
school
and
business
school
make
these
two
programs
extremely
different.
Law
school
is
typically
three
years
long
whereas
business
school
is
usually
two
years
long.
This
might
not
seem
like
much,
but
a
year
is
a
really
long
time
when
it
comes
to
assessing
careers
and
opportunity
costs.
Moreover,
an
extra
year
of
schooling
can
cost
a
fortune,
especially
when
you
factor
in
costs
of
living,
interest
on
student
debt,
and
other
expenses.

In
addition,
most
law
schools
are
graded
on
a
curve,
which
leads
to
a
bitter
environment
and
tough
competition.
From
my
own
research,
curves
are
less
prevalent
in
business
schools
than
in
law
schools,
which
must
have
a
huge
impact
on
student
life.
Moreover,
while
law
students
live
and
die
by
their
grades
in
law
school,
it
appears
as
if
grades
might
be
less
important
to
business
school
graduates
(depending
on
where
they
attend)
than
who
they
know.
This
must
lessen
the
level
of
stress
business
school
students
experience
since
they
do
not
need
to
freak
out
as
much
if
they
underperformed
in
a
given
class.

Several
of
my
friends
who
attended
business
school
tell
me
that
one
of
the
most
important
parts
of
attending
business
school
is
networking.
People
try
to
network
with
business
school
classmates
so
that
they
can
have
help
when
it
comes
to
securing
a
job
or
moving
from
position
to
position
later
in
their
careers.
Moreover,
students
want
to
be
a
part
of
an
alumni
community,
since
people
who
are
also
part
of
a
given
alumni
community
may
favor
their
own
and
try
to
help
fellow
alumni
secure
jobs
in
the
future.

Networking
is
definitely
important
to
law
students,
and
individuals
can
secure
clients
and
job
opportunities
based
on
the
connections
made
in
law
school.
However,
networking
seems
less
important
to
law
students.
My
business
school
friends
tell
me
that
a
real
emphasis
that
doesn’t
really
exist
at
most
law
schools
is
placed
on
going
out
and
attending
networking
events
in
business
school.
In
this
way,
law
school
is
a
more
traditional
professional
program
in
which
the
primary
goal
of
attending
school
is
to
learn
skills
that
will
be
helpful
when
practicing
law.

Nothing
in
article
is
intended
to
minimize
business
school
programs
or
people
who
hold
MBAs.
Such
programs
can
be
an
important
way
for
individuals
to
obtain
a
credential
that
may
be
helpful
as
they
embark
on
a
career
in
the
business
world
or
finance.
However,
some
people
have
a
tendency
to
lump
categories
of
people
together
to
find
commonality
of
experiences.
With
few
exceptions,
business
school
and
law
school
are
very
different
and
should
not
be
compared.




Rothman Larger HeadshotJordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of




The
Rothman
Law
Firm
,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of




Student
Debt
Diaries
,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at




jordan@rothman.law
.