Author: TSA Press

Bonus
season
is
around
the
corner! 
But
first,
associates
need
to
make
it
through
performance
reviews. 
Few
people
look
forward
to
the
review
process. 
Some
find
it
stressful
—
after
all,
these
can
be
complicated
conversations. 
Others
may
be
tempted
to
dismiss
it
as
pointless,
considering
that
many
firms
award
bonuses
based
primarily
on
class
year
and/or
hours
billed. 
But
even
if
you’re
at
a
firm
where
performance
reviews
are
not
a
critical
compensation
driver,
you
should
treat
the
review
process
as
a
valuable
opportunity
to
elicit
helpful
feedback.

Instead
of
viewing
your
performance
review
as
something
to
be
endured,
take
control
of
the
process
to
the
extent
possible. 
Put
in
the
time
to


prepare

fully,


clarify

the
feedback
you
receive,
and


reflect

on
the
implications
for
your
broader
career
goals.

Prepare
for
the
review
conversation

It’s
likely
that
your
firm
will
ask
you
to
do
some
form
of
self-evaluation
ahead
of
the
review
process,
but
regardless
of
what
is
formally
expected,
preparation
is
critical
to
achieving
a
productive
conversation. 
Questions
to
ask
yourself
include:

• 
  Did
  you
  make
  your
  hours?
• 
  What
  sort
  of
  feedback
  have
  you
  gotten
  along
  the
  way?
• 
  Did
  you
  have
  a
  trend
  line
  this
  year
  of
  improvement,
  or
  did
  you
  have
  the
  same
  problems
  all
  year?
• 
  Did
  you
  successfully
  address
  the
  feedback
  you
  received
  in
  last
  year’s
  review?

Identify
your
weaknesses,
and
think
about
how
to
frame
them
constructively. 
You
want
to
go
into
the
review
conversation
prepared
to
talk
about
what
you
learned
and
what
you’ll
do
differently
next
time. 
Demonstrating
that
you
have
a
specific
plan
for
future
improvements
helps
your
evaluator
look
past
any
bumps.

Ahead
of
the
review,
be
sure
to
update
your
deal
sheet
or
representative
matters
list! 
In
case
you
don’t
already
have
a
deal
sheet,
see
how
to
make
one


here. 
Updating
your
deal
sheet
will
help
you
review
your
work
and
prepare
to
discuss
both
victories
and
setbacks. 
It’s
too
easy
and
too
common
for
a
supervisor
to
forget
about
things
you
thought
were
really
important,
so
don’t
rely
on
your
reviewer
to
generate
a
comprehensive
list. 
Having
your
deal
sheet
at
your
fingertips
will
make
sure
you’re
prepared
to
advocate
for
yourself.

Listen
carefully
and
seek
clarification

During
the
review
conversation,
remember
to
take
notes
as
best
you
can. 
You
can’t
expect
to
remember
it
all,
especially
if
you’re
anxious
or
you
get
feedback
that
surprises
you. 
Detailed
notes
will
be
helpful
if
you
need
to
follow
up
on
something
later.  

Ideally,
the
feedback
you
receive
will
be
specific
and
actionable,
but
it’s
possible
it
will
be
generic
and
unhelpful. 
If
so,
it’s
on
you
to
ask
granular
questions
to
elicit
more
precisely
what
the
reviewer
is
talking
about. 
This
applies
to
either
positive
or
negative
feedback,
but
it’s
especially
critical
in
situations
where
the
reviewer
is
expressing
concern
about
your
performance. 
Valuable
questions
to
ask
include:

• 
  Am
  I
  on
  track
  for
  partnership?
• 
  What
  do
  I
  need
  to
  do
  this
  year
  to
  get
  there/stay
  there?
• 
  What
  specific
  skills
  would
  you
  like
  to
  see
  me
  acquire
  this
  year?
• 
  Are
  there
  any
  weaknesses
  I
  need
  to
  shore
  up?
• 
  Now
  that
  I’m
  a
  Xth-year
  associate,
  how
  do
  you
  see
  my
  role
  on
  deals
  in
  the
  coming
  year? 
  In
  mentoring
  juniors
  on
  our
  team? 
  In
  business
  development?

Ask
for
clarification,
especially
about
critiques,
but
don’t
be
defensive. 
Remember:
“curious,
not
furious.” 
Achieving
this
balance
can
be
really
challenging
for
us
over-achieving
lawyers. 
You
may
find
it
helpful
to
practice
reacting
to
feedback
in
advance,
ensuring
you
enter
the
review
conversation
with
some
default
responses. 


Ask
A
Manager

has
some
great
advice
on
this,
as
well
as
scripts
for
if
you
disagree
with
the
criticism. 
For
example:
“I’m
glad
you’re
telling
me
this. 
I’ve
been
letting
some
deadlines
on
this
project
slide
because
I
had
thought
that
projects
x
and
z
were
higher
priorities
and
was
more
focused
there. 
But
am
I
looking
at
this
wrong?”

Keep
in
mind
that
it’s
perfectly
acceptable
to
ask
for
a
follow-up
conversation! 
You
may
find
that
you
ask
more
effective
questions
after
having
had
some
time
to
gather
your
thoughts. 
Ahead
of
the
follow-up,
draft
a
list
of
questions
digging
into
the
specifics
of
how
the
firm
wants
you
to
perform
in
the
next
year.

Reflect
on
your
broader
career
trajectory

Although
the
review
process
is
principally
about
your
performance
in
your
current
role
at
your
current
firm,
don’t
forget
to
reflect
on
the
bigger
picture. 
The
end
of
the
year
is
a
great
time
to
consider
whether
your
firm
remains
the
best
setting
to
achieve
your
career
goals. 
Are
you
getting
the
work
you
want? 
How
do
you
feel
about
your
professional
development? 
Have
you
found
your
people
at
this
firm? 
Are
you
content?

If
not,
keep
in
mind
that
other
firms
would
be
happy
to
have
you. 
I’d
love
to
help
you
think
through
your
options
or
connect
you
with
one
of
my
colleagues
in
your
area.

Good
luck!

---

---

Q4
is
here
and
that
begs
the
question
for
many
lawyers:
should
I
stay,
or
should
I
go?
The
answer
(of
course)
is:
it
depends.
Q4
is
a
popular
time
for
many
to
start
the
process
of
contemplating
a
job
move.
The
anticipation
of
the
end
of
the
year
draws
significant
attention
to
the
need
for
change
and
seeking
out
new
career
goals.
But,
quite
often,
fears
and
self-doubt
creep
in
—
will
a
budget
or
hiring
freeze
impact
me,
or
is
it
a
strategic
move
to
jump
ship
now?
What
about
layoffs
that
are
widespread
across
LinkedIn?

I
ask
job
seekers
to
process
a
series
of
questions
before
they
dive
into
a
Q4
job
search.
One
of
those
questions
centers
on
how
the
bonus
structure
works
at
the
company
or
firm
and
whether
they
would
be
leaving
money
on
the
table
by
exiting
before
year-end.
Keep
in
mind,
many
opt
to
finish
up
year-end
at
a
company
and
instead
go
full
throttle
in
a
Q1
job
search.
Once
mid-October
hits,
year-end
fatigue
sets
in,
and
before
you
know
it,
the
holidays
are
here,
and
so
is
the
end
of
the
year.

Before
embarking
on
a
job
search,
you’ll
want
to
review
your
compensation
structure,
bonus
schedule,
PTO/vacation
time,
and
401(k)
vesting.
It
may
be
advantageous
to
update
your
career
marketing
documents
(resume,
bio,
deal
sheet,
and
LinkedIn
profile)
and
stay
through
end
of
Q1
in
the
next
fiscal
year
to
secure
that
long-awaited
and
lofty
bonus.
It’s
also
a
good
reminder
to
take
accrued
PTO
or
consider
cashing
it
out
when
putting
in
your
notice.

This
introspective
approach
allows
you
to
analyze
and
assess
your
negotiating
power
if
you
do
decide
to
make
a
power
move
and
leave
your
company
or
firm
before
bonus
payout.
It
also
puts
you
in
a
stronger
position
to
advise
an
executive
recruiter
that
you’re
giving
up
X
dollars
by
leaving
the
company
or
firm
three
months
earlier
than
anticipated.

What
can
you
do
in
the
interim
to
prepare
for
a
Q4
job
search?
Here’s
a
helpful
checklist
to
get
started:

1. Perform
   an
   in-depth
   audit
   of
   your
   resume
   and
   LinkedIn.
   Make
   sure
   both
   are
   in
   an
   optimal
   state
   to
   engage
   with
   outreach
   to
   recruiters
   and
   your
   network.
   The
   next
   logical
   step
   will
   be
   contacting
   warm
   leads
   and
   increasing
   networking
   activity.
   I
   have
   two
   helpful
   articles
   on
   
   updating
   your
   legal
   resume
   and
   
   making
   quick
   changes
   to
   your
   LinkedIn
   profile
   to
   prepare
   for
   a
   job
   search.
   These
   are
   filled
   with
   various
   tips
   and
   strategies
   to
   get
   you
   up
   to
   speed
   on
   trends
   for
   a
   digital-age
   job
   search.
2. Take
   notice
   if
   you
   have
   irrelevant
   content
   on
   your
   resume
   or
   LinkedIn
   profile.
   Make
   sure
   dates
   and
   job
   titles
   line
   up.
   Remove
   inaccurate
   or
   outdated
   information
   —
   for
   example,
   no
   one
   needs
   the
   intricate
   details
   of
   the
   associate
   role
   you
   had
   in
   1992.
   Giving
   the
   areas
   of
   practice
   and
   focus
   is
   enough.
3. Invest
   in
   upgrading
   to
   a
   high-resolution
   LinkedIn
   headshot.
   The
   
   Headshot
   Crew
   (founded
   by
   expert
   headshot
   photographer
   
   Peter
   Hurley)
   provides
   a
   great
   database
   to
   search
   for
   a
   trained
   headshot
   photographer
   in
   your
   geographic
   area.
   If
   you
   do
   extensive
   speaking
   engagements,
   the
   investment
   of
   a
   professional
   headshot
   will
   pay
   off
   in
   dividends.
4. Run
   a
   Google
   search
   on
   your
   name.
   See
   what’s
   out
   there
   about
   you
   —
   perhaps
   a
   recent
   podcast
   interview,
   a
   panel
   presentation,
   or
   a
   media
   feature.
   Consider
   linking
   it
   to
   your
   featured
   section
   on
   your
   LinkedIn
   profile.
5. Chart
   out
   your
   
   job
   search
   strategy.
   Make
   a
   list
   of
   targeted
   companies
   or
   law
   firms
   you
   want
   to
   perform
   outreach
   to,
   along
   with
   a
   list
   of
   managing
   partners
   or
   targeted
   legal
   and
   business
   executives
   you
   plan
   to
   network
   with.
   Seek
   out
   
   informational
   interviews
   —
   they
   are
   powerful
   leverage
   in
   a
   crowded
   and
   competitive
   job
   market.
   Remember,
   a
   successful
   job
   search
   is
   one
   where
   you’re
   
   organized
   and
   prepared.
6. Consider
   working
   with
   an
   executive
   or
   career
   coach
   that
   specializes
   in
   legal
   careers.
   More
   than
   85%
   of
   my
   senior
   executive
   and
   C-suite
   clients
   (in
   law
   and
   outside)
   have
   worked
   with
   or
   are
   concurrently
   working
   with
   an
   executive
   and/or
   leadership
   coach
   to
   prioritize
   their
   next
   career
   step.
   Tackling
   that
   
   next
   general
   counsel
   job
   search
   might
   feel
   overwhelming,
   especially
   if
   you
   haven’t
   done
   so
   in
   a
   decade
   or
   longer.
   An
   executive
   or
   career
   coach
   can
   help
   you
   to
   get
   unstuck,
   create
   clarity
   from
   chaos,
   and
   help
   you
   work
   through
   the
   emotions
   of
   making
   a
   career
   move.
7. Strategically
   increase
   your
   connections
   on
   LinkedIn.
   Set
   a
   goal
   for
   yourself
   to
   reach
   out
   to
   a
   specific
   number
   of
   legal
   and
   business
   executives
   weekly
   to
   increase
   your
   visibility
   on
   the
   platform.
   Consider
   investing
   in
   a
   LinkedIn
   premium
   membership
   to
   get
   more
   competitive
   intelligence
   insights
   on
   job
   postings
   and
   for
   targeted
   outreach,
   such
   as
   sending
   InMail
   messages.
   Remember,
   having
   an
   
   effective
   networking
   strategy
   is
   key.

As
the
year
winds
down,
take
inventory
of
things
you’ve
learned,
contributions
you’ve
made
in
your
legal
department
(or
for
the
overall
business
enterprise)
and
reflect
on
upcoming
end-of-year
performance
evaluations.
There
is
no
time
like
Q4
to
focus
on
creating
goals
and
objectives
for
the
new
calendar
year.

Have
a
job
search
or
career-related
question
for
me?

Connect
with
me
on
LinkedIn.

---

Wendi
Weiner
is
an attorney,
career
expert,
and
founder
of The
Writing
Guru,
an
award-winning
executive
resume
writing
services
company.
Wendi creates
powerful
career
and
personal
brands
for
attorneys,
executives,
and
C-suite/Board
leaders
for
their
job
search
and
digital
footprint. She
also
writes
for
major
publications
about
alternative
careers
for
lawyers, personal
branding,
LinkedIn
storytelling,
career
strategy,
and
the
job
search
process. You
can
reach
her
by
email
at wendi@writingguru.net,
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn,
and
follow
her
on
Twitter @thewritingguru.  

Normally,
this
wouldn’t
be
surprising,
and
normally,
this
wouldn’t
even
require
a
blog
post,
but
because
nothing
in
the
5th
Circuit
makes
sense
these
days,
it is a
little
surprising
and
it is worth
a
post
to
note
that
despite
the
insanity
of
Judge
Andy
Oldham’s
ruling
putting
Texas’s
content
moderation
law
back
on
the
books,
he
has
now
agreed
to

put
that
ruling
on
hold while
the
parties
ask
the
Supreme
Court
to
hear
the
case.

Again,
such
a
thing
is
pretty
standard
in
lots
of
cases,
but
this
is
the
case
where,
back
in
May,
Oldham
decided
to
say
that the
law
should
go
into
effect immediately without
any
explanation
at
all.
That
necessitated
a rush to
the
Supreme
Court’s
shadow
docket,
where
the
justices put
the
law
on
hold,
in
order
to
allow
the
regular,
normal
procedure
to
take
place.
As
you’re
well
aware,
months
later,
Oldham
finally
came
out
with
his batshit
crazy
decision that
required
Oldham
to
ignore
a
century’s
worth
of
precedent,
as
well
as decades
worth
of
conservative
1st
Amendment
orthodoxy in
order
to
argue
that
the
1st
Amendment’s
association
rights
no
longer
apply
to
social
media.

NetChoice
and
CCIA,
the
plaintiff
trade
groups
in
the
case,
asked
Oldham
to
stay
his
ruling
(that
is,
stop
it
from
taking
effect)
in
order
to
ask
the
Supreme
Court
to
weigh
in.
A
few
weeks
ago,
Florida
already asked
the
Supreme
Court to
hear
its
appeal
of
the 11th
Circuit’s
rejection of
a
similar
law.
The
two
laws
are
not
identical,
and
differ
in
some
potentially
important
ways,
but
the
two
appeals
courts
rulings
are
in
clear
conflict,
and
it
is
extremely
likely
that
the
Supreme
Court
will
take
these
cases
(and
likely
merge
them
into
one),
in
what
may
be
the
most
important
Supreme
Court
case
regarding
the
internet
ever.

Perhaps
surprisingly,
Texas
chose
not
to
oppose
the
request
for
the
stay.
Again,
in
normal
times,
that
wouldn’t
be
a
surprise
or
even
noteworthy.
But,
again,
these
are
not
normal
times,
and
Texas
politicians
keep
insisting
they
really,
really
need
this
law.
Of
course,
they’re
smart
enough
to
know
that
it
was
going
to
the
Supreme
Court
eventually
anyway,
so
it
probably
did
no
one
any
good
to
play
petty
politics
over
this.

Of
course,
there’s
the
other
theory
as
well:
that
this
is
a
case
of
the
dog
(Texas)
actually
catching
the
car
(a
blatantly
unconstitutional
content
moderation
law),
and
having
no
idea
what
to
actually
do
with
it.
I
do
kinda
wonder
if
at
least
some
of
the
folks
in
the
Texas
government
were
beginning
to
realize just
how
messed
up things
would
be
if
the
law
actually
went
into
effect,
because
it’s literally
impossible
to
comply
with.
So,
getting
to
wait
until
the
Supreme
Court
reviews
the
case
gives
those
folks
an
“out.”
They
don’t
end
up
creating
a huge mess
for
the
internet
just
days
before
the
midterm
elections,
and
if
(fingers
crossed)
the
Supreme
Court
gets
stuff
right
next
year,
they
can
just
blame
the
Supreme
Court
to
their
gullible
base,
rather
than
have
to
deal
with
the
fallout
of
their
spite-driven
nonsense.

Texas’s
Ridiculous
Content
Moderation
Bill
Put
On
Hold
Until
The
Supreme
Court
Can
Consider
It

More
Law-Related
Stories
From
Techdirt:

Seattle
Times,
Brands
Complain
Over
Senate
Campaign
Ad
That
Is
Clearly
Protected
Speech

Senator
Manchin
Tries
To
Sneak
His
Dangerous
‘See
Something,
Say
Something’
Attack
On
The
Internet
Into
The
Must
Pass
NDAA

Dumb
GOP
Propaganda
Long
Ago
Conflated
Essential
Infrastructure
With
‘Socialism’

If
you’re
a
Biglaw
associate
in
the
fall
of
2022,
two
things
are
probably
true:
(i)
you’re
hearing
rumors
of
stealth
layoffs
(yikes!)
and
hoping
you’re
not
going
to
be
out
of
a
job
soon,
and
(ii)
you’re
eagerly
awaiting
news
of
your
bonus,
which
may
be
right
around
the
corner.

To
kick
off
our
coverage,
we’re
asking
you
to
take
this
(always)
confidential,
(always)
brief
survey
to
share
your
thoughts
on
the
upcoming
bonus season.
And
if
you’d
like
to
stay
on
top
of
any
changes
this
bonus
season,
enter
your
email
below
to
sign
up
for
our
free
bonus
alerts.

And
as
a
little
reminder,
we
love
covering
the
Biglaw
bonus
season,
but
we
need
your
help.
As
soon
as
your
firm’s
bonus
memo
comes
out,
please

email
us
(subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus”).
We
always
keep
our
sources
on
bonus
stories
anonymous.
There’s
no
need
to
send
the
memo
using
your
firm
email
account;
your
personal
email
account
is
fine.
Please
be
sure
to
include
the
memo
as
proof;
we
like
to
post
complete
bonus
memos
as
a
service
to
our
readers.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
attach
as
a
picture
if
you
are
worried
about
metadata
in
a
PDF
or
Word
file.

Don’t
forget,
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts,
please
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish
—
including,
of
course,
the
first
such
announcement.

---

Staci
Zaretsky is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email
her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

Twitter
or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn.

---

---

Skip
to
main
content

*
So
I
guess
we’ll
just
be
allowing
untraceable
guns
to
roam
the
streets
of
America
now.
Thanks,

Bruen!
[The
Hill]

*
Prosecution
of
the
Parkland
shooter
has
brought
conversations
on
the
death
penalty
back
to
the
forefront.
[Politico]

*
Black
history
month
came
early!
Lawyers
across
the
pond
talk
diversity.
[Law.com]

*
Conservatives
are
still
pressed
about
being
the
“real
victims”
of
cancel
culture.
Check
out
this
hot
take
on
the
newest
Yale
controversy.
[Newsweek]

*
…I’d
reconsider
that
2
month
rental
in
Honolulu
if
I
were
you.
[Star
Adviser]

---

Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Lying
About
Grieving
Parents
Is
Frowned
Upon,
Huh?:

Alex
Jones
has
got
to
plead
ignorance
on
this
one…
though
he
still
has
to
pay.

Do
We
Call
Them
“ALTies”
Or
Something?:

The
American
Legal
Technology
Awards
are
out!

Who
Couldn’t
Use
A
Littler
More
Money?:

Littler
announces
some
raises.

Grass
Isn’t
Always
Greener:

Marijuana
pardon
train
seems
delayed
at
the
station.

Yesterday,
a
jury
in
Connecticut
clobbered
Alex
Jones
and
his
company
Free
Speech
Systems
with
a
$965
million
bill
for
compensatory
damages
in
the
second
Sandy
Hook
defamation
suit.
That
number
could
cross
the
$1
billion
mark
once
punitive
damages
and
attorneys
fees
are
added
in.

Naturally
Jones
greeted
the
news

in
the
most
Alex
Jones
way
possible:
he
performed
his
troll
schtick
and
begged
his
listeners
for
cash.

“Ain’t
gonna
be
happening,
ain’t
no
money,”
he
said
bitterly
as
the
verdict
was
read
out.
“Now
remember,
I’m
in
bankruptcy,
we’ve
got
two
years
of
appeals,
the
money
you
donate
does
not
go
to
these
people,
it
goes
to
fight
this
fraud,
and
it
goes
to
stabilize
the
company.”

REALLY?

Because
FSS
spent
the
past
three
months
telling
a
bankruptcy
court
that
it
needs
to
maximize
profits
to
pay
off
its
creditors,
of
which
the
Sandy
Hook
Plaintiffs
just
became
far
and
away
the
largest.
Of
course
FSS
claims
the
creditor
first
in
line
to
get
paid
is
its
supplement
supply
company
PQPR
Holdings
Limited
LLC,
which
“remembered”
in
2021
that
it
had
failed
to
invoice
FSS
for
beet
tincture
and
other
pharmacological
concoctions
for
years
on
end.
Right
around
the
time
Jones
and
FSS
got
themselves
default
judgments
in
the
Sandy
Hook
Suits,
FSS
executed
a
couple
of
promissory
notes
in
favor
of
PQPR,
securitizing
the
“debt”
and
prioritizing
PQPR
over
other
creditors.
The
fact
that
Jones
and
his
parents
happen
to
own
PQPR
through
a
series
of
Nevada
LLCs
is
…
purely
coincidental.

Months
ago,
the
Texas
Plaintiffs

filed
suit
under
the Texas
Uniform
Fraudulent
Transfer
Act
(TUFTA),
alleging
that
the
PQPR
notes
were
a
sham
and
that
Jones
improperly
transferred
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
out
of
the
company
in
preparation
for
litigation
and
bankruptcy.
And
indeed
FSS’s
corporate
representative
Brittany
Paz

testified
that
Jones
pocketed

millions
of
dollars
of
cryptocurrency
solicited
through
the
Infowars
website.

The
PQPR
notes
and
the
transfers
have
become
a
topic
of
heated
debate
in
the
bankruptcy
filing.
The
Sandy
Hook
plaintiffs

moved
to
deny
the
notes
and
put
FSS
under
the
control
of
a
Tort
Claimant’s
Committee.
That
motion
is
currently
tabled
pending
mediation,
but
US
Bankruptcy
Judge
Christopher
Lopez
has
shown
some
skepticism
about
the
promissory
notes,
and
even
took
the
unusual
step
of
disqualifying
FSS’s
original
lawyers
and
proposed
restructuring
officer
for
several
reasons,
including
their
willingness
to
ratify
the
PQPR
debt
without
conducting
any
due
diligence.
The
court
also
instructed
the
US
Trustee
to
investigate
FSS’s
books,
resulting
in

subpoenas
to
PQPR
and
FSS
asking
a
lot
of
pointed
questions
they
clearly
do
not
want
to
answer

In
the
meantime,
Jones
and
PQPR
—
which
are
functionally
the
same
entity
—
are

playing
hardball
with
FSS
now
that
Jones
doesn’t
have
full
control
of
the
company
any
more.
On
Tuesday
PQPR’s
counsel
Stephen
Lemmon
huffily

notified
the
court
that
the
company
is
going
to
stop
shipping
product
to
FSS
in
ten
days.

“PQPR
is
a
creditor
secured
by
a
perfected
lien
on
virtually
all
assets
of
the
Debtor,
together
with
proceeds,”
he
argued,
insisting
that
PQPR
had
“made
many
concessions”
and
tut-tutting
that
FSS
“has
not
been
able
to
comply
with
the
budget.”

“PQPR
is
ceasing
ordering
new
product
for
the
Debtor
to
sell,
since
the
Debtor
cannot
say
how
it
can
repay
PQPR,”
Lemmon
concluded
ruefully,
sniffing
that
“there
must
be
some
semblance
of
a
credible
budget,
and
meaningful
controls
built
into
any
cash
collateral
order.”

In
the
meantime,
Jones
is
making

threatening
noises
about
his
right
to
be
indemnified
by
FSS
for
any
litigation
costs,
most
particularly
that
billion
dollars
he
owes
to
the
Sandy
Hook
plaintiffs
in
Connecticut
and
Texas.
Clearly
he
intends
to
pocket
all
of
the
company’s
assets
while
shielding
himself
from
personal
liability,
and
if
he
has
to
blow
up
FSS
and
go
start
over,
he
doesn’t
really
care.

Any
minute
now
Ed
Norton
is
going
to

shoot
Brad
Pitt
and
all
the
buildings
will
fall
down
destroying
all
the
creditors.
Or
perhaps
not,
if
Judge
Lopez
tosses
out
the
PQPR
notes
and
rules
that
FSS
doesn’t
have
to
indemnify
Jones.

Clearly
there’s
not
a
billion
dollars
to
satisfy
the
current
tally
between
the
Texas
and
Connecticut
plaintiffs.
A
forensic
expert
testified
at
trial
that
the
company
may
be
worth
as
much
$270
million,
or
as
little
as
zero
without
its
star
pitchman.
And
whatever
happens
when
the
inevitable
appeals
are
concluded,
the
amount
the
Sandy
Hook
plaintiffs
can
recover
is
going
to
rest
chiefly
on
the
outcome
of
this
bankruptcy.

No
pressure,
Judge
Lopez!

FSS
Bankruptcy
Docket
[via
Court
Listener]

---

Liz
Dye lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
writes
about
law
and
politics.