Morning Docket: 12.17.25 – Above the Law

*
Minority
law
school
enrollment
declines
at
most
schools.
[NY
Times
]

*
Harvard
morgue
manager
sentenced
to
8
years.
This
case
has
gone
on
forever…
the
legal
fees
must
have
cost
him
an
arm
and
a
leg.
[WCVB]

*
Lawmakers
noticing
that
Brad
Bondi’s
clients
keep
getting
good
deals
from
the
DOJ.
[Punchbowl
News
]

*
Lawyers
fined
for
hallucinations
in
OnlyFans
case
in
quintessential
2025
story.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
The
cure
for
AI
hallucinations
may
be
dusting
off
your
cross-examination
skills.
[JD
Supra
]

*
DOJ
trying
to
push
Maurene
Comey
case
to
Merit
Board.
[New
York
Law
Journal
]

*
Company
publicly
trying
to
abandon
its
former
name
files
trademark
suit
against
new
company
trying
to
use
the
name.
[Law360]

*
Supreme
Court
Shameless
Audition
Update:
Judge
Thapar
pens
gratuitous
separate
opinion
in
gun
case
arguing
that
the
Constitution
doesn’t
apply
to
immigrants.
[Reuters]

Bonuses For The Holidays! – See Also – Above the Law

Susman
Godfrey’s
Bonuses
Punch
Above
The
Market!:
They’re
doing
good
work
and
the
money
shows!
But
Wait,
There’s
More!:
Check
out
Goodwin
and
Massumi
+
Consoli
LLP!
‘Tis
The
Season
For
Promotions!:
Cadwalader
promotes
a
big
partner
class.
Catch
Up
On
This
Partners
To
Enemies
Arc:
Marc
Kasowitz
and
Eric
Herschmann
take
their
fight
to
the
courtroom.
Bring
Out
Ye
Nominations!:
Who
will
be
crowned
2025’s
Lawyer
Of
The
Year?

Law Schools Are Increasingly Popular – Above the Law



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


According
to
data
from
the
Council
of
the
ABA
Section
of
Legal
Education
and
Admissions
to
the
Bar,
how
much
did
first-year
law
school
enrollment
increase
this
year
over
2024?


Hint:
Law
school
enrollment
is
being
driven
up
by
economic
uncertainty
and
the
“Trump
bump,”
that
is,
political
divisions.



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Why Lawyers Keep Casting Blind And How A Lawyer Coach Can Help You Hit The Right Water – Above the Law

A
few
days
after
a
fruitful
guided
fishing
trip
with
my
son,
I
told
the
story
of
our
bounty
to
my
friend
Rafi
Arbel
of
Market
JD,
who
works
with
law
firms
on
their
marketing.
I
explained
how
we
spent
the
morning
fishing
on
the
Chain
O’
Lakes
flipping
docks
for
crappies,
bluegills,
and
perch.
For
the
uninitiated,
flipping
docks
requires
precision.
You
fire
a
small
bait
and
bobber
into
tight
shadows
under
docks
to
get
to
where
the
fish
are
most
likely
to
lie
in
waiting.
When
you
hit
the
mark,
it
feels
sensational.
When
you
miss,
you
end
up
snagged
on
the
dock
or
having
to
recast,
which
can
get
frustrating.

Rafi
stopped
me
mid
story
and
asked
why
we
hired
a
guide.
Why
not
just
take
my
son
out
on
our
own.
The
answer
came
easily.
We
do
not
have
a
boat,
but
even
if
we
did,
that
is
not
why
we
brought
in
a
professional.
A
good
guide
changes
the
entire
outcome.
They
know
where
the
fish
are
and
what
bait
or
lures
have
the
greatest
probability
for
success.
They
position
the
boat
to
give
you
the
perfect
angle
and
move
on
quickly
you
when
the
spot
cools
off.
At
the
end
of
the
trip,
they
even
fillet
and
clean
the
fish
so
you
leave
with
dinner
in
the
cooler.

A
lack
of
guidance
on
the
water
is
incredibly
similar
to
the
challenges
lawyers
face
with
business
development
and
personal
branding.
Most
lawyers
are
on
the
“water”
every
week
with
no
clear
plan,
no
real
process,
and
without
an
experienced
guide
who
truly
knows
the
lake.
Lawyers
regularly
tell
themselves
they
can
figure
it
out
because
they
are
smart,
capable,
and
used
to
solving
complex
problems.
Yet
intelligence
does
not
replace
experience,
and
working
harder
does
not
replace
a
proven
system.

If
you
break
down
what
a
skilled
guide
does,
you
end
up
with
the
same
three
fundamentals
that
define
effective
legal
business
development
coaching.


First,
planning
the
trip.

Lawyers
often
jump
straight
into
activity
without
ever
defining
where
they
want
to
go
or
how
they
plan
to
get
there.
A
solid
plan
clarifies
the
targets,
the
strategy,
and
the
tools
needed
along
the
way.
This
includes
building
or
refining
a
marketing
plan,
tightening
your
LinkedIn
profile,
sharpening
your
infomercial,
identifying
the
targets
you
should
meet
with,
and
understanding
where
your
greatest
opportunities
actually
sit.
Most
lawyers
cannot
see
this
because
it’s
hard
to
read
the
label
from
inside
the
bottle.
An
experienced
coach
provides
that
external
view
and
turns
good
intentions
into
an
actionable
results-driven
direction.


Second,
following
a
real
process.

Fishing
requires
more
than
a
boat
and
bait.
It
requires
a
system
for
reading
the
water,
interpreting
conditions,
and
adjusting
to
what
is
happening
beneath
the
surface.
Business
development
works
in
much
the
same
way.
Without
a
proven
process,
lawyers
drift
into
random
acts
of
marketing
and
hope
something
eventually
sticks.
An
industry-focused
coach
brings
a
tested
framework
that
guides
who
to
meet,
how
to
qualify
opportunities,
how
to
lead
effective
business
conversations,
and
how
to
turn
relationships
into
real
work.
Not
every
coach
has
a
system.
Some
simply
react
to
your
ideas.
But
the
best
coaches,
like
the
best
guides,
provide
you
with
methods
and
language
you
can
follow
every
time.


Third,
feedback
and
evaluation.

A
fishing
guide
does
not
sit
still
when
nothing
is
biting.
They
change
tactics.
They
move
locations
and
constantly
evaluate
what
is
working
and
what
is
not.
Lawyers
need
the
same
level
of
course
correction.
An
effective
coach
reviews
what
you
are
doing,
identifies
where
you
are
drifting
off
the
mark,
and
suggests
adjustments
so
you
get
back
on
track.
This
is
where
long-term
success
is
built.
A
fun
question
to
ask
yourself
,
“Do
I
have
three
years
of
experience
in
business
development
or
do
I
have
one
year,
three
times?”
Think
about
that
for
a
moment.
Without
feedback,
lawyers
can
spend
hundreds
of
hours
a
year
on
business
development
with
little
to
show
for
it,
simply
because
no
one
is
helping
them
adjust
in
real
time.

The
broader
point
is
not
merely
about
the
value
of
coaching.
It
is
about
efficiency,
focus
and
clarity.
Lawyers
can
and
do
go
it
alone,
hoping
they
figure
it
out.
Or
they
can
work
with
someone
who
already
knows
the
water,
knows
the
patterns,
and
knows
how
to
accelerate
progress.

Fishing
with
a
guide
is
not
about
catching
one
fish.
It
is
about
learning
the
system,
so
every
future
trip
is
more
productive.
Business
development
works
the
same
way.
When
lawyers
get
the
right
plan,
the
right
process,
and
the
right
feedback,
the
results
come
faster
and
with
far
less
struggle.

If
you
want
to
explore
how
this
applies
to
your
practice,
I
am
always
open
to
a
conversation.
You
can
reach
me
at

[email protected]

or
visit
bethatlawyer.com.

A
guide
makes
all
the
difference
on
the
water.
The
right
coach
makes
the
same
difference
in
your
career.
The
difference
is
that
one
leads
to
fun
and
a
great
meal,
for
you
it
leads
to
control,
freedom,
and
independence
as
a
lawyer.




Steve
Fretzin
is
a
bestselling
author,
host
of
the
“Be
That
Lawyer”
podcast,
and
business
development
coach
exclusively
for
attorneys.
Steve
has
committed
his
career
to
helping
lawyers
learn
key
growth
skills
not
currently
taught
in
law
school.
His
clients
soon
become
top
rainmakers
and
credit
Steve’s
program
and
coaching
for
their
success.
He
can
be
reached
directly
by
email
at 
[email protected].
Or
you
can
easily
find
him
on
his
website
at 
www.fretzin.com or
LinkedIn
at 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevefretzin.

AI Summit 2025: 10 Takeaways And Some Unanswered Questions – Above the Law

I
walked
into
the
AI
Summit
with
hard
questions
about
industry
maturity,
infrastructure
challenges,
and
implementation
realities.
My
previous
coverage
explored
some
of
these
issues
in
my

initial
fireside
chat
analysis

and

pre-Summit
post
.
Here’s
what
I
found

and
what
I
didn’t
find

across
10
key
takeaways.


My
10
Takeaways

1.
Did
the
show
focus
on
the
above
challenges?
Largely,
no.
There
were
a
few
sessions
that
mentioned
the
infrastructure,
for
example,
but
none
talked
about
the
energy
risks.
The
only
one
that
came
close
was
one
on
sovereign
AI
but
it
was
mainly
a
marketing
pitch
for
a
supercomputer.

2.
As
far
as
the
verification
and
economic
challenges,
there
was
not
much
discussion.
Rather
the
Summit
felt
like
another
AI
love
fest:
everyone
with
different
spoons
stirring
in
the
same
old
bowl.
I
get
it,
it’s
a
show
for
the
vendors
and
by
the
vendors.
But
shouldn’t
there
have
been
at
least
a
little
more
discussion
of
reality
and
the
challenges?

3.
One
bright
spot
was
the
cybersecurity
stage.
Most
of
the
presenters
for
this
stage
recognized
the
cybersecurity
risks
that
sophisticated
AI
could
pose.
Like
AI
platforms
that
could
adapt
to
the
defenses
and
then
attack
again
and
again.
One
presenter
mentioned
the
risks
to
the
electric
grid
and
infrastructure
which
could
impact
AI
and
slow
its
use.

4.
I
was
particularly
interested
in
hearing
from
the
New
York
City
presenters,
who
returned
to
discuss
how
the
City
uses
AI
to
serve
underserved
communities.
While
progress
has
been
made,
much
of
their
presentation
focused
on
political
threats
to
these
programs
under
the
incoming
mayoral
administration
and
in
general.
The
fears
were
palpable
and
understandable.

5.
There
were
several
references
to
ambient
AI

AI
that
works
in
the
background
without
people
realizing
it.
That’s
where
we
are
headed.
But
the
focus
should
have
been
perhaps
more
on
what
the
tools
that
AI
supports
could
actually
do
and
what
problems
those
tools
could
now
solve
with
AI’s
help.
Indeed,
there
appeared
to
be
lots
of
interest
in
the
use
of
AI
in
health
care
and
in
finance.
Those
sessions
were
the
most
well
attended
which
perhaps
reflects
an
interest,
as
mentioned
above,
in
how
AI
could
be
applied
practically
to
make
other
things
work
better.

6.
There
was
a
lot
of
interest
in
what
AI
will
do
to
creative
fields
and
how
AI
could
be
legitimately
used
by
humans
in
a
creative
fashion.
The
prevailing
view
seemed
to
be
that
ideas
come
from
humans,
and
the
AI
enables
implementation
and
the
fleshing
out
of
those
ideas
in
ways
not
previously
possible.
That’s
good
for
now.
But
the
issue
really
is
as
AI
advances,
what
will
it
do
to
human
creativity
fields
and
the
arts.
The
sessions
looked
less
at
this
and
what
AI
can
do
now.

7.
A
common
and
perhaps
by
now
trite
theme:
AI
with
humans
beats
AI
or
humans
alone.
It’s
the
human
in
the
loop
argument.
But
rarely
does
anyone
stop
and
ask
what
this
means.
What
human?
And
where
in
the
loop
does
the
human
fit
today
and
tomorrow?
I’m
not
faulting
the
AI
Summit
for
not
asking
these
questions,
no
other
conference
is
either.

8.
I
have
to
talk
about
the
facility,
the
Javits
Center,
in
particular,
since
it
will
be
the
site
of
the
legal
tech
conference,

Legalweek
.
In
2026,
that
conference
is
moving
from
midtown
Manhattan
where
it’s
been
for
years.
 The
good?
Javits
is
roomy,
the
exhibit
space
flows
well.
It’s
not
chopped
on
three
floors
like
the
Hilton
space
is.
 The
food
at
Javits
is
not
as
bad
as
some
conference
venues.
There’s
even
a
Starbucks
onsite.

The
bad?
Many
of
the
stages
took
place
on
the
exhibit
floor.
For
the
most
part
the
presentations
there
were
hard
to
hear
over
the
din
of
the
rest
of
the
floor.
Whether
Legalweek
will
resort
to
the
having
the
same
arrangement
remains
to
be
seen.
But
it’s
distracting
to
say
the
least.

The
ugly?
It’s
a
walk
from
most
hotels.
There
are
few
restaurants
in
the
vicinity.
There
is
no
shopping
nearby.
All
the
things
that
made
the
midtown
site
attractive
to
many
are
far
away
from
the
Javits
Center.
That
doesn’t
particularly
bother
me
since
I
go
to
several
shows
where
walking
some
distance
to
get
from
place
to
place
is
necessary.
But
based
on
the
feedback
to
this
year’s
ABA

TechShow

of
which
I
was
co-chair,
which
made
a
similar
move
to
a
similar
venue,
McCormick
Place
in
Chicago,
I
predict
Legalweek
will
hear
a
slew
of
complaints
over
this.
And
since
it
will
in
early
March,
it
may
be
a
cold
walk
as
well.

9.
As
I

have
written
,
there
were
some
useful
perspectives
from
business
leaders
on
the
proper
AI
mindset.
That
mindset
is
much
different
than
I
see
in
legal.
Part
of
that
is
by
necessity:
legal
thrives
on
accuracy
and
confidence.
But
as
one
of
my
clients
used
to
say,
we
always
need
to
be
careful
we
don’t
spend
too
much
time
in
the
closet
talking
to
ourselves.
That’s
the
beauty
of
attending
a
conference
like
the
AI
Summit.
But
like
most
nonlegal
conferences
I
attend,
there
were
few,
if
any,
legal
professionals
or
lawyers
in
attendance
at
the
Summit.
There
was
little
discussion
of
legal
issues.
It’s
not
good
for
legal
to
ignore
what’s
going
on
in
the
rest
of
the
world.
If
nothing
else,
many
of
the
exhibitors
and
attendees
are
likely
clients
of
lawyers
and
law
firms
(or
could
be). 
It
might
be
good
to
hear
what
they
are
thinking.

10.
Unlike
some
shows
I
have
been
to,
I
didn’t
get
the
sense
of
a
bro
culture.
People
were
energetic
and
enthusiastic
about
AI
in
general,
and
in
particular,
use
cases.
They
are
looking
to
push
the
envelope.
That’s
a
good
thing.
That’s
how
we
advance.
It’s
like
another
show
I
attend
every
year,
CES:
75%
of
what’s
talked
about
may
never
happen.
But
some
things
will.
Or
what’s
talked
about
will
inspire
new
things
to
happen
and
be
developed.
That’s
the
beauty
of
attending:
fresh
perspectives,
new
ways
of
thinking.


When
Can
We
Talk?

My
takeaways
lead
to
some
broader
questions
that
need
addressing.
Let
me
hasten
to
say
if
I
sound
like
I’m
an
AI
curmudgeon
of
late,
I’m
not.
I
believe
in
AI
and
its
vast
opportunities.

But
with
those
opportunities
come
challenges.
Like
how
we
can
ensure
we
have
the
infrastructure
to
support
all
the
things
we
want
AI
to
do.
 Like
how
AI
will
disrupt
the
workforce,
eliminate
jobs,
and
redefine
what
work
means.

We
get
too
many
pithy
concepts
tossed
around
like
truisms:
AI
won’t
replace
humans
it
will
just
replace
humans
that
don’t
use
it.
Or
there
will
be
other
jobs
to
replace
those
lost
to
the
technology.
Maybe
these
things
are
true.
But
just
mouthing
them
doesn’t
make
that
so.

Perhaps
shows
like
the
AI
Summit
are
not
the
place
to
talk
openly
about
these
things.
But
we
need
to
have
that
discussion
someplace:
a
first-time
attendee
asked
me
at
the
Summit
if
there
were
any
conferences
devoted
to
an
examination
of
the
hard
issues.
I
thought
for
a
moment
and
finally
said,
“None
that
I
can
think
of.”

Right
now,
our
relationship
with
AI
is
like
one
where
hard
issues
are
always
put
off.
That
never
ends
well.

It’s
great
to
sing
your
team’s
fight
song
and
cheer.
It’s
even
better
when
your
team
has
the
talent
to
meet
the
challenges
it
faces.
Let’s
recognize
the
difference
between
cheering
and
meeting
the
real
AI
challenges..




Stephen
Embry
is
a
lawyer,
speaker,
blogger,
and
writer.
He
publishes TechLaw
Crossroads
,
a
blog
devoted
to
the
examination
of
the
tension
between
technology,
the
law,
and
the
practice
of
law

Cadwalader Promotes Big Partner Class Amid Merger Talks – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


We’re
thrilled
to
share
this
news.
The
past
year
has
been
one
of
the
most
successful
in
our
firm’s
storied
233-year
history.
Our
strong
performance
is
thanks
to
the
extraordinary
talent
that
Cadwalader
has
long
been
known
for.
Our
new
partners,
special
counsel
and
counsel
will
carry
forward
this
legacy.






Patrick
Quinn
,
Cadwalader’s
comanaging
partner,
in
comments
concerning
the
firm’s
recent

partner
and
counsel
promotions
.
The
firm,
which
has
had
its

fair
share
of
troubles

this
year,
is
promoting
seven
attorneys
to
partner
and
17
attorneys
to
special
counsel
and
counsel
positions.





Staci
Zaretsky
 is
the
managing
editor
of
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.

Unregulated mining sparks ‘environmental armageddon’ fears in Zimbabwe

The
concerns
were
raised
during This
Morning
on
Asakhe
,
a
programme
that
examined
the
depth
of
Zimbabwe’s
environmental
crisis.

Speaking
on
the
scale
of
environmental
degradation,
the
Executive
Director
of
the
Centre
for
Natural
Resource
Governance
(CNRG),
Farai
Maguwu,
said
the
country’s
mining
boom
had
reached
crisis
levels,
fuelled
by
economic
collapse
and
the
loss
of
formal
employment.

“It
has
reached
a
crisis
level.
When
you
look
at
what
is
happening
in
Zimbabwe
today
regarding
mining,
it
is
like
we
have
discovered
minerals
for
the
first
time

everybody
is
getting
into
mining,”
Maguwu
said.
“There
are
push
factors
where
the
economy
has
failed
to
take
off,
factories
and
industries
have
closed,
and
many
people
have
lost
formal
employment.
There
is
now
a
consensus
that
the
only
place
where
you
can
get
rich
quickly
is
mining.”

Maguwu
warned
that
governance
in
the
mining
sector
had
significantly
weakened,
allowing
mining
activities
to
spread
into
ecologically
sensitive
and
protected
areas.

“We
have
seen
the
weakening
of
governance
to
the
extent
that
ecologically
sensitive
areas
are
no
longer
spared.
Mountains
are
disappearing,
and
rivers
are
being
destroyed,
even
though
there
is
a
policy
banning
mining
in
rivers,
it
is
simply
not
being
respected,”
he
said.

He
cited
mining
activities
at
UNESCO
heritage
sites
and
protected
areas
such
as
Mavuradona
Wilderness,
as
well
as
destruction
in
areas
including
Shurugwi
and
Poterekwa
Mountain.

“What
is
even
more
worrying
is
that
those
who
should
be
enforcing
the
law
are
now
part
of
the
syndicates
destroying
the
environment,”
Maguwu
said.

He
added
that
in
areas
such
as
Penhalonga
in
Mutare,
some
police
officers,
soldiers,
senior
government
officials
and
Central
Intelligence
Organisation
(CIO)
operatives
were
allegedly
involved
in
mining
activities.

“This
has
gone
beyond
being
an
environmental
crisis,
it
has
become
a
national
security
threat,”
he
said.

Maguwu
further
warned
that
mining
was
taking
place
beneath
roads
and
residential
areas,
increasing
the
risk
of
disasters.

“They
are
digging
massive
holes
in
mountains,
creating
underground
dams.
When
these
collapse,
they
will
cause
flash
floods,
and
people
will
be
washed
away,”
he
said.

He
expressed
concern
over
what
he
described
as
the
government’s
apparent
lack
of
urgency
in
addressing
destructive
mining.

“The
level
of
environmental
destruction
taking
place
in
Zimbabwe
should
be
alarming
to
the
government
if
it
is
concerned
about
the
people
and
the
future
of
this
country,”
Maguwu
said.

Maguwu
also
noted
that
the
shift
from
underground
mining
to
open-cast
mining
had
accelerated
environmental
damage.

“Before
2000,
mining
in
Zimbabwe
was
largely
underground
and
did
not
disturb
the
surface
as
much.
Today,
forests
are
being
cleared
over
one,
two
or
even
three
kilometres.
Agricultural
land
is
being
turned
into
mining
land,
undermining
food
sovereignty,”
he
said.

He
warned
about
the
uncontrolled
use
and
disposal
of
toxic
substances
such
as
mercury
and
cyanide,
particularly
during
the
rainy
season.

“There
are
no
punitive
measures
to
prevent
irresponsible
disposal
of
these
substances.
Mercury
and
cyanide
are
being
dumped
indiscriminately,”
Maguwu
said.

He
explained
that
gold
processing
methods
such
as
heap
leaching
were
worsening
contamination.

“When
the
rains
fall,
these
chemicals
are
washed
into
rivers,
streams
and
dams,”
he
said.

Maguwu
expressed
particular
concern
for
rural
communities
that
rely
on
untreated
water
from
shallow
wells,
especially
in
areas
such
as
Marange
and
Matabeleland
North.

“The
majority
of
Zimbabweans
live
in
rural
areas
where
people
drink
water
from
shallow
wells.
All
that
water
is
contaminated,”
he
said.
“What
comes
from
irresponsible
mining
is
something
we
cannot
fully
comprehend
at
this
stage,
but
many
Zimbabweans
are
dying,
and
will
die
prematurely,
because
of
this.
That
is
why
I
call
it
environmental
Armageddon.
No
one
is
safe.”

Echoing
similar
concerns,
the
Executive
Director
of
the
Centre
for
Environmental
and
Corporate
Accountability
Research
(CECAR),
Nkosikhona
Sibanda,
said
the
crisis
was
widespread,
with
Matabeleland
North
experiencing
a
surge
in
mining
activities,
particularly
by
Chinese-owned
companies.

“The
crisis
is
similar
across
the
country.
In
Matabeleland
North,
we
have
seen
an
influx
of
Chinese
mining
companies
in
areas
such
as
Hwange,
Kamativi
in
Binga,
and
other
parts
of
the
province,”
Sibanda
said.

“When
you
hear
about
foreign
investment,
you
expect
development,
but
for
communities
in
these
areas
it
has
been
the
opposite.
Mining
has
come
with
severe
environmental
degradation.”

Sibanda
said
studies
conducted
between
2024
and
2025
revealed
alarming
levels
of
air
pollution
in
Hwange.

“The
outcomes
were
shocking.
The
air
residents
are
breathing
is
far
beyond
safe
levels.
People
are
essentially
walking
corpses
because
they
are
inhaling
toxic
gases,”
he
said.

He
added
that
health
facilities
had
reported
a
sharp
increase
in
respiratory
and
chronic
diseases.

“This
shows
that
it
is
not
only
the
environment
that
is
being
damaged,
people’s
lives
are
at
risk
as
well,”
Sibanda
said.

Trump Lawyer Fight Club: Marc Kasowitz Sued By Former Partner Eric Herschmann – Above the Law

Entropy
rules
the
universe,
no
matter
how
closely
you
flirt
with
authoritarians.

Once
upon
a
time,
Marc
Kasowitz
and
Eric
Herschmann
were
partners
at
Kasowitz’s
eponymous
firm.

Now
Herschmann
is
suing
Kasowitz

seeking
“millions”
in
unpaid
compensation
and
alleging
a
pattern
of
financial
mismanagement.
Then
Donald
Trump
decided
to
enter
politics
and
everything
fell
apart
as
these
two
decided
to
hitch
their
wagons
to
his
sundowning
star.

Back
in
2017,
Trump
sauntered
into
office
convinced
that
his
longtime
real
estate
litigator
could
serve
as
his
White
House
consigliere.
It
did
not
go
well.
Between
the

ethics
complaints

and

diplomatic
blunders
,
Kasowitz
retreated
from
the
presidential
power.
Toward
the
end
of
Trump’s
first
term,
while
the
boss
told
Americans
to
consider
injecting
themselves
with
Lysol
and
horse
dewormers,
Eric
Herschmann
decided
to
take
his
turn
in
the
Trump
orbit.
He
showed
up
just
in
time
to

be
with
Trump
on
January
6


oops

but
embarked
on
a
reasonably
successful
rehabilitation
effort
as

someone
out
there

kept
telling
the
press
amusing
anecdotes
about
him
bluntly
clowning
on

the
most
decidedly
clownish
Trump
lawyers
.

Most
of
America
remembers
Herschmann
for
his
genuinely
eloquent
advice
that
Coup4Dummies
lawyer
John
Eastman
needed
to
“get
a
great
f***ing
criminal
defense
lawyer.”

While
both
Kasowitz
and
Herschmann
once
reached
for
the
stars
with
their
proximity
to
power,
they
are
now
barely
remembered
among
Trump’s
cast
of
supporting
characters.
But
brash,
litigious
egos
are
a
feature
that
Trump
selects
for
in
his
lawyers,
meaning
it
was
only
a
matter
of
time
before
they
earned
a
chaotic
post-credits
scene
in
the
Trump
Cinematic
Universe.

As
the
New
York
Law
Journal
explains:

“The
complaint
claims
that
Kasowitz
overextended
the
firm’s
finances
by
promised
lucrative
compensation
guarantees
to
lateral
partners,
who
then
failed
to
generate
enough
business.
Herschmann
also
alleges
the
firm
began
offering
‘heavily
discounted
hourly
fee
rates’
to
induce
important
clients
not
to
switch
representation.”

Herschmann
claims
that
he
didn’t
know
about
this
at
the
time
and
was
“induced”
to
return
to
the
firm
after
his
January
6
misadventures
“by
claims
of
financial
stability,”
and
that
he
wouldn’t
have
come
back
if
he
had
a
better
sense
of
its
financial
state.

“Kasowitz
would
use
the
firm’s
profits
to
pay
off
most
or
all
of
the
bank
debt
by
the
end
of
each
year,
which
left
grossly
insufficient
profits
to
pay
the
partner
distributions
Kasowitz
wished
to
pay
to
keep
partners
from
leaving
the
firm,”
the
lawsuit
claimed.
“To
cover
up
these
financial
problems,
Kasowitz
then
secretly
went
into
further
debt.”

For
a
story
that’s
only
tangentially
about
Trump,
there
are
a
lot
of
allegations
that
would
be
right
at
home
in
a
story
about
running
an
Atlantic
City
casino
into
the
ground.
Or,
for
that
matter,
in
a
story
about
the

current

federal
budget
under
Trump.

In
a
lengthy
statement,
a
Kasowitz
spokesperson
said
the
lawsuit
was
“written
for
the
media,
not
for
the
court.”

“As
Mr.
Herschmann
is
well
aware,
any
dispute
concerning
the
firm
is
subject
to
confidential
arbitration,”
the
statement
said.
“For
30
years,
Mr.
Herschmann
was
paid
extraordinarily
well
for
relatively
few
billable
hours
and
small
amounts
of
business.
In
a
case
of
‘no
good
deed
goes
unpunished,’
when
his
outrageous
compensation
demands
near
the
end
of
his
career
were
not
met,
he
decided
to
file
a
thoroughly
false
public
pleading
violating,
among
other
things,
the
partnership
agreement’s
confidential
arbitration
requirement.
Our
filings
will
address
Mr.
Herschmann’s
frivolous
claims,
and
his
own
conduct
as
a
partner
in
the
firm.”

“Mr.
Herschmann
was
paid
extraordinarily
well
for
relatively
few
billable
hours
and
small
amounts
of
business.”
Speaking
of
Trump
parallels,
the
firm
couldn’t
get
through
its
statement
without
hurling
a
random
insult
Herschmann’s
way.
If
he
brought
in
enough
business
to
get
paid
more
under
his
agreement,
it
doesn’t
really
matter
if
the
firm
wants
to
claim
they
were
just
being
generous.
The
response
begins
by
accusing
Herschmann
of
playing
to
the
media…
and
immediately
pivots
to

yeah,
and
he
sucks
too!

I
mean,
what
are
we
doing
here,
people?

But
it
allows
the
firm
to
inject
a
little
bit
more
Trump-branded
chaos
into
the
proceedings.
No
wonder
he
liked
these
guys.


Marc
Kasowitz,
Kasowitz
Sued
Over
Alleged
Unpaid
Wages,
Financial
Mismangment

[New
York
Law
Journal]


Earlier
:

Oh
Look,
It’s
A
Former
Biglaw
Partner
Hanging
Out
With
Trump
Before
The
Capitol
Riot!


Axios
Story
Confirms
That
Trump
Lawyers
REALLY
Want
To
Be
Able
To
Re-Enter
Polite
Society


Everyone
Thought
John
Eastman
Was
Crazy
And
Just
Kind
Of…
Let
Him
Do
It
Anyway

Trump
White
House
Lawyer
Eric
Herschmann
Called
BS
On
Trump’s
Personal
Lawyers




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Belarus, Zimbabwe sign military cooperation agreement


Belarusian
Defense
Minister,
Lieutenant
General
Viktor
Khrenin
met
with
Zimbabwean
Defense
Minister
Oppah
Muchinguri-Kashiri
in
Zimbabwe,
BelTA
reported
citing
the
Belarusian
Defense
Ministry
press
service.

“Our
working
meeting
in
blooming
springtime
Minsk
in
May
2023
laid
the
foundations
for
bilateral
military
cooperation
between
Belarus
and
Zimbabwe.
Today
in
sunny
Harare
we
are
taking
another
important
step
on
this
path.
The
main
purpose
of
my
visit
is
to
intensify
bilateral
military
and
military
technology
cooperation
between
the
Republic
of
Belarus
and
the
Republic
of
Zimbabwe.
In
today’s
world
we
need
to
be
ready
to
respond
to
any
challenges
that
threaten
the
security
of
our
countries.
And
in
military
terms,
Belarus
has
something
to
offer
Zimbabwe,”
Viktor
Khrenin
noted.

The
Belarusian
defense
minister
pointed
out
that
Belarus’
Armed
Forces
are
ready
to
share
their
experience
with
their
Zimbabwean
colleagues
in
a
number
of
fields.
“Just
like
Zimbabwe
in
Africa
Belarus
in
Europe
is
a
rare
island
of
stability
in
a
sea
of
conflicts
and
contradictions,
terrorism
and
transnational
crime,”
he
said.
“The
Armed
Forces
continue
developing
and
improving.
We
have
a
wealth
of
experience
that
we
are
ready
to
share
with
our
Zimbabwean
colleagues.”

According
to
the
minister,
an
analysis
of
previous
agreements
shows
that
cooperation
in
the
field
of
military
education
could
become
the
basis
for
practical
interaction.
“You,
Madam
Minister,
had
an
opportunity
to
personally
familiarize
yourself
with
the
flagship
of
Belarusian
military
education

the
Military
Academy
of
the
Republic
of
Belarus.
However,
it
is
only
part
of
an
extensive
system
that
fully
meets
the
needs
of
the
Armed
Forces
for
qualified
personnel,”
said
Viktor
Khrenin,
adding
that
there
is
great
potential
for
developing
relations
between
the
defense
ministries
of
the
two
countries.
“We
have
reached
an
understanding
on
the
priority
nature
of
cooperation
in
the
field
of
military
education
and
personnel
training
as
well
as
the
sharing
of
best
practices
in
areas
of
mutual
interest.
The
key
point
is
that
there
are
no
topics
that
are
off
limits
for
discussion.
Rest
assured
that
any
initiatives
or
requests
expressed
by
the
Zimbabwean
side
will
be
duly
considered
without
delay.”

In
turn,
Zimbabwean
Defense
Minister
Oppah
Muchinguri-Kashiri
noted
that
the
Republic
of
Zimbabwe
is
open
to
new
projects
with
Belarus,
including
in
the
defense
sector.
“As
for
the
implementation
of
projects
aimed
at
ensuring
security,
our
defense
cooperation
has
made
significant
progress,”
she
said
before
the
meeting.
“Today
is
another
important
moment
because
we
will
sign
an
agreement
on
military
cooperation.
It
will
allow
us
to
develop
military
technology
cooperation
and
establish
exchanges
in
the
field
of
personnel
training
and
medical
support.
In
Zimbabwe
we
strive
to
maintain
a
high
level
of
cooperation
with
Belarus.
The
Republic
of
Zimbabwe
intends
to
send
a
military
attaché
to
Belarus.
This
will
allow
us
to
promptly
organize
the
events
specified
in
the
agreement.
Despite
sanctions
we
have
been
able
to
consolidate
our
friends
around
us.
We
are
grateful
to
you
for
supplying
agricultural
machines,
thanks
to
which
we
have
not
only
improved
our
agriculture,
but
can
also
export
agricultural
products
to
neighboring
countries.”

Oppah
Muchinguri-Kashiri
noted
that
Zimbabwe
and
Belarus
face
illegal
sanctions
imposed
by
Western
countries.
“We
will
not
allow
it
to
stand
in
the
way
of
scientific
and
technological
progress
and
hinder
the
development
of
independent
branches
of
the
economy.
In
these
conditions
bilateral
cooperation
can
be
built
on
the
basis
of
mutual
exchange,”
said
the
defense
minister
of
the
Republic
of
Zimbabwe.

As
a
result
of
the
negotiations
the
heads
of
the
defense
ministries
of
the
Republic
of
Belarus
and
the
Republic
of
Zimbabwe
signed
an
interagency
agreement
on
military
cooperation.

Source:


Belarus,
Zimbabwe
sign
military
cooperation
agreement


AZERTAC

Post
published
in:

Featured

Biglaw Firm Rewards Their Whole Team With Huge Bonuses – Above the Law

Susman
Godfrey
made
their
fair
share
of
Above
the
Law
headlines
this
year
for

reminding
the
Trump
administration
that
some
firms
still
have
a
backbone
.
And
after
their
bonus
announcement,
they’re
showing
that
fighting
the
good
fight
can
pay
out
handsomely!
The

2025
Law
Firm
Of
The
Year
Award-winning
firm

is
closing
out
a
very
successful
year
with
six
new
partners
and
a
whole
lot
of
money
to
go
around.

Here’s
the
scale:

That’s
a
yuge
amount
of
money!
To
everyone
at
Susman
Godfrey,
enjoy
the
spoils
of
a
very
profitable
year.
And
I
do
mean

everyon
e

the
firm
makes
a
point
to
pay
bonuses
to
their
all
of
their
staff,
paralegals,
and
managers,
so
everyone
gets
a
share.

We
like
hearing
about
bonuses
almost
as
much
as
you
enjoy
spending
them.
As
soon
as
your
firm’s
memo
comes
out,
please email
it
to
us

(subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus”)
or
text
us
(646-820-8477).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Salary
&
Bonus
Alerts,
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
is
learning
to
swim, is
interested
in
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected]
and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.