Zombie planes and other Pentagon ghost stories

This
special,
spooky
edition
of
The
Weekly
Break
Out
is
quite
the
treat.
Editor
in
Chief
Aaron
Mehta

eeer,
“Mr.
Skeleton”

is
visited
by
four
shockingly
scary
guests
(and
Senior
Networks
and
Information
Warfare
Reporter
Mark
Pomerleau,
who
really
just
missed
the
memo)
to
talk
about
the
eerie
status
of
some
Pentagon
programs.

Hear
about
how
the
Air
Force
has
slain
its
Integrated
Capabilities
Command
and
the
Army
has
murdered
the
M10
Booker
tank.
Other
programs
like
Humvees
and
the
E-7
Wedgetail
may
have
a
grim
future
ahead.
Plus,
we
talk
about
zombie
programs
that
have
been
brought
back
to
life!

We
hope
this
episode
wasn’t
too
scary
for
you.
Be
sure
to
sign
up
for
our
newsletter
below
to
see
what
other
tricks
The
Weekly
Break
Out
has
up
its
sleeve.
Happy
Halloween
from
the
Breaking
Defense
team!

I Asked My Cellphone Service Provider T-Mobile What The Deal Was With Its Donation To Trump’s White House East Wing Demolition – Above the Law

(Photo
by
MANDEL
NGAN/AFP
via
Getty
Images)

For
several
months,
President
Donald
Trump
has
been
talking
about
the
massive
gaudy
ballroom
that
he
thinks
is
needed
at
the
White
House.
In
July,

Trump
said
of
the
ballroom’s
impact

on
the
White
House’s
East
Wing,
“It’ll
be
near
it
but
not
touching
it,
and
pays
total
respect
to
the
existing
building,
which
I’m
the
biggest
fan
of.”

Last
week,
construction
crews
completely
demolished
the
East
Wing
of
the
White
House
without
any
input
whatsoever
from
historians
or
structural
preservationists.
The

East
Wing
as
we
know
it

(well,
as
we
knew
it)
dates
to
1942
when
President
Franklin
D.
Roosevelt
commissioned
the
structure
to
add
necessary
wartime
working
space
to
the
White
House
as
well
as
to
conceal
a
fortified
underground
bunker
added
for
emergency
use
by
the
president
and
key
staff.

The

East
Wing
has
had

a
rich
history,
including
as
the
part
of
the
White
House
that

half
a
dozen
first
ladies

worked
out
of.
It
took
only
about
three
days
to
destroy
83
years
of
presidential
history.
This
from
the
same
administration
that
just
had
D.C.’s

only
Confederate
statute
reinstalled

while
crowing
the
same
tired
lies
you
always
hear
from
the
right
about
how
much
they
love
and
feel
the
need
to
preserve
history
whenever
it’s
a
monument
to
racism
they
want
to
protect
rather
than
the
East
Wing
of
the
effing
White
House.

At
any
rate,
the
Trump
administration
has
been
bragging
about
how
Trump’s
new
ballroom
will
not
be
taxpayer
funded,
but
will
instead
be
funded
by
private
donors.
I
mean,
taxpayers
still
aren’t
getting
compensated
for
the
total
destruction
of
the
historical
East
Wing
of
the
White
House
that
we
already
owned,
but
sure.

Also
I
don’t
really
see
how

the
president
selling
influence
to
giant
corporations

and
obscenely
wealthy
individuals
is
going
to
be
better
for
us
than
the
waste
of
a
few
hundred
million
more
tax
dollars
by
the
administration
that
just
made
history
of
its
own
by

ballooning
America’s
national
debt
by
an
additional
$1
trillion

in
the
span
of
only
two
months.
Nevertheless,
along
with
some
of
the
usual
suspects
when
it
comes
to
facilitating
presidential
corruption
in
this
administration,
the

list
of
donors
to
the
ballroom
project

provided
by
the
Trump
administration
also
contains
some
very
big,
mainstream
names,
including
a
few
companies
I
do
business
with
myself.

One
of
those
companies
is
my
cellphone
service
provider,
T-Mobile.
Though
it
is
on
the
expensive
side
compared
to
some
of
its
competitors,
I
have
generally
been
very
happy
with
T-Mobile
(thanks,
T-Mobile,
for
providing
cellphone
service
that
held
up
while
I
was
recently
traveling
in
Ukraine
even
through
“missiles
and

drones
raining
down

on
the
Lviv
region”).

I
contacted
T-Mobile
US
Media
Relations
with
the
following
questions:

  1. I
    understand
    that
    the
    T-Mobile
    donation
    was
    made
    to
    the
    Trust
    for
    the
    National
    Mall.
    How
    was
    T-Mobile
    approached
    about
    making
    this
    donation?
  2. Who,
    specifically,
    approached
    T-Mobile
    about
    its
    donation?
  3. Was
    T-Mobile
    aware
    that
    its
    donation
    would
    be
    used
    to
    fund
    construction
    of
    the
    new
    White
    House
    ballroom
    at
    the
    time
    that
    T-Mobile
    agreed
    to
    make
    the
    donation?
  4. How
    much
    did
    T-Mobile
    donate
    or
    pledge
    to
    donate?
  5. Were
    any
    conversations
    had
    between
    anyone
    at
    T-Mobile
    and
    any
    official
    in
    which
    both
    this
    donation
    as
    well
    as
    business
    pertaining
    to
    the
    Trump
    Mobile
    network
    and/or
    Liberty
    Mobile
    Wireless
    came
    up?
  6. Was
    anything
    promised,
    whether
    expressly
    or
    implicitly,
    to
    T-Mobile
    in
    return
    for
    making
    this
    donation?
  7. Does
    T-Mobile
    support
    the
    complete
    demolition
    of
    the
    East
    Wing
    of
    the
    White
    House?

I
received
a
response
a
few
hours
later
that,
although
not
perfectly
tailored
to
my
questions,
proved
enlightening
on
its
own
merits.
Here
it
is,
verbatim,
attributed
to
T-Mobile
as
instructed:

Ahead
of
America’s
250th
Anniversary,
T-Mobile
donated
to
the
Trust
for
the
National
Mall,
which
partners
with
the
National
Park
Service
to
restore
and
enrich
the
historic
landmarks
that
define
our
nation’s
capital,
such
as
the
White
House
ballroom.

T-Mobile
has
no
role
in
the
use
of
those
funds
or
decisions
related
to
the
construction
of
the
ballroom.

Perhaps
I’m
being
lied
to

T-Mobile
has
a
lot
more
to
lose
by
offending
Donald
Trump
than
it
does
by
offending
me

but
I
don’t
think
so.
I
even
happen
to
know
a
little
about

plans
for
the
U.S.
Semiquincentennial

which
helps
me
read
between
the
lines
here
a
little
to
understand
that
most
of
these
plans
long
predate
Trump’s
second
term.

Of
course,
as
we’ve
seen
repeatedly,
Trump
is
going
to
throw
pretty
much
all
the
plans
that
predate
his
second
term
right
out
the
window,
along
with
possibly
throwing
away
the
window
itself.
Likely
T-Mobile
did
not
know
this
when
it
made
its
donation.
Quite
possibly
T-Mobile,
and
perhaps
other
companies
tagged
as
donors
for
the
ballroom
by
the
Trump
administration,
did
not
even
know
that
Trump
would
be
elected
president
at
the
time
the
funds
were
donated.

Beyond
wanting
to
generally
make
money,
I
do
not
know
what
is
in
the
cold,
metallic,
metaphorical
heart
of
a
giant
corporation
like
T-Mobile.
That
being
said,
it
sure
seems
to
me
that
their
involvement
in
this
whole
East
Wing
fiasco
is
based
largely
on
Trump
raiding
funds
that
should
have
been
used
for
something
else

one
of
his
signature
moves,
really

and
amounts
to
a
donation
made
in
good
faith
gone
awry.
In
other
words,
quite
possibly
Trump
is
abusing
his
position
(who’d
have
thunk
it?)
and
is
now
using
a
false
implication
of
support
from
mainstream
companies
in
an
attempt
to
prop
up
a
facade
of
legitimacy
over
his
White
House
ballroom
debacle.




Jonathan
Wolf
is
a
civil
litigator
and
author
of 
Your
Debt-Free
JD
 (affiliate
link).
He
has
taught
legal
writing,
written
for
a
wide
variety
of
publications,
and
made
it
both
his
business
and
his
pleasure
to
be
financially
and
scientifically
literate.
Any
views
he
expresses
are
probably
pure
gold,
but
are
nonetheless
solely
his
own
and
should
not
be
attributed
to
any
organization
with
which
he
is
affiliated.
He
wouldn’t
want
to
share
the
credit
anyway.
He
can
be
reached
at 
[email protected].

Morning Docket: 10.29.25 – Above the Law

*
Meet
the
superstar
team
who
have
to
convince
the
Supreme
Court
that
the
word
“tariffs”
does
not
appear
in
the
IEEPA,
which
for
some
reason
is
an
uphill
battle.
[National
Law
Journal
]

*
Ninth
Circuit
will
convene
en
banc
to
reconsider

giving
Trump
the
power
to
send
troops
to
assassinate
costumed
frogs
.
[CNN]

*
Freshly
pardoned
former
Binance
chief
threatens
to
sue
Elizabeth
Warren
for
saying
he
pleaded
guilty
to
money
laundering
instead
of
pleading
guilty
to
setting
up
the
conditions
to
allow
money
laundering.
Not
sure
how
much
reputational
damage
exists
between
that
technicality
trench.
[NY
Post
]

*
Cameo
sues
OpenAI
claiming
a
feature
named
“cameo”
violates
their
trademark.
[Reuters]

*
Another
Trump
U.S.
Attorney
found
to
be
illegally
squatting
in
the
job.
[Law360]

*
D.C.
Bar
committee
suggests
firms
who
made
deals
with
Trump
have
ethics
issues.
[NY
Times
]

*
LinkedIn
battles
data
scrapers
to
protect
us
all
from
a
future
where
every
AI
response
is
about
B2B
marketing.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

SONA: Mnangagwa projects 6.6% economic growth amidst national challenges

Delivering
the
State
of
the
Nation
Address
(SONA)
at
the
New
Parliament
Building
in
Mt
Hampden
on
Tuesday,
President
Mnangagwa
said
the
country’s
growth
was
anchored
on
“the
unity,
peace
and
resilience
of
our
people”
despite
the
continued
impact
of
international
sanctions.

“The
unity,
peace
and
resilience
of
our
people
have
been
the
pillar
of
economic
development
of
our
country
in
the
face
of
illegal
sanctions,”
he
said.
“Let
us
remain
focused
and
disciplined
as
we
entrench
economic
stability
and
growth
in
our
march
towards
Vision
2030.”

Mnangagwa
highlighted
major
gains
in
agriculture,
citing
record
harvests
of
tobacco,
maize
and
wheat,
supported
by
the
Pfumvudza/Intwasa
Programme,
which
has
benefited
more
than
three
million
households.

He
said
livestock
production
had
also
improved,
with
the
national
herd
now
at
5.7
million
and
milk
output
increasing
from
76.7
million
litres
in
2019
to
115
million
litres
in
2024.
The
President
added
that
irrigation
coverage
had
expanded
to
221,000
hectares,
with
a
target
of
reaching
496,000
hectares
as
part
of
efforts
to
build
climate
resilience.

Turning
to
the
energy
sector,
the
President
said
government
was
scaling
up
the
Rural
Electrification
Programme
to
improve
access
for
communities
across
the
country.
“Independent
Power
Producers
and
industrial
players
have
been
licensed,
increasing
our
national
power
supply.
The
Rural
Electrification
Programme
that
is
electrifying
both
public
institutions
and
homesteads
is
improving
access
to
energy
for
our
rural
communities,”
he
said.

Ironically,
a
power
outage
plunged
the
Parliament
chamber
into
darkness
with
the
president
forced
to
continue
his
speech
by
torchlight.

“We
should
never
get
tired
of
preaching
hope,
unity
and
peace,
as
one
indivisible
nation,”
he
said.
“A
better
quality
of
life
for
all
our
people
is
at
the
core
of
the
policies
and
projects
of
my
administration.”

Mnangagwa
said
government’s
monetary
and
fiscal
policies
had
stabilised
the
economy
and
the
local
currency,
the
ZiG,
while
foreign
currency
inflows
reached
US$10.4
billion
by
August
2025,
up
from
US$8.3
billion
during
the
same
period
last
year.

“Going
into
the
future,
the
trend
in
macro-economic
stability
is
expected
to
become
the
status
quo
in
our
country,”
he
said.

He
announced
that
foreign
reserves
had
risen
to
US$900
million
as
of
September,
up
from
US$700
million
in
June,
and
highlighted
the
World
Bank’s
recognition
of
Zimbabwe
as
one
of
the
top
10
countries
globally
that
had
made
the
most
progress
in
building
reserves.

The
President
also
set
out
an
ambitious
legislative
agenda
for
the
Third
Session
of
the
Tenth
Parliament,
calling
for
greater
efficiency
in
passing
delayed
Bills.
“The
total
backlog
of
outstanding
Bills
is
unacceptable,”
he
said.
“Parliament
must
do
more
to
ensure
these
Bills
are
brought
before
the
House
and
finalised.”

Among
the
new
Bills
to
be
tabled
are
the
National
Productivity
Institute
Bill,
Disaster
Risk
Management
Bill,
and
amendments
to
the
Competition
Act,
Mines
and
Minerals
Act,
and
Broadcasting
Services
Act.

Mnangagwa
said
fiscal
capacity
had
allowed
government
to
extend
social
protection
to
vulnerable
groups
through
programmes
such
as
the
Food
Deficit
Mitigation
Programme
and
the
Basic
Education
Assistance
Module.

He
also
outlined
progress
in
health
and
education
reforms,
including
digital
health
services
and
the
recently
adopted
Zimbabwe
National
Artificial
Intelligence
Strategy,
aimed
at
fostering
innovation
and
youth
empowerment.
“We
must
continue
to
drive
innovation
for
national
growth
and
deliver
a
beneficial
knowledge
economy,”
he
said.

In
his
closing
remarks,
Mnangagwa
reiterated
his
Vision
2030
mantra,
calling
for
collective
national
effort
to
build
Zimbabwe.
“We,
the
people
of
this
great
nation,
are
building
our
motherland,
Zimbabwe,
step
by
step,
brick
by
brick
and
stone
upon
stone,”
he
said.
“There
is
no
turning
back.
Victory,
success
and
prosperity
are
certain.
Forward
ever,
backward
never.”

Dark moment for SONA: Mnangagwa’s speech affected by power outage

By
NewZimbabwe.com

The
unexpected
blackout
disrupted
proceedings
for
several
minutes,
leaving
the
National
Assembly
in
confusion.

Some
ruling
party
legislators
shouted
that
the
incident
was
an
act
of
sabotage,
while
others
murmured
in
disbelief.

Unfazed,
Mnangagwa
continued
reading
his
speech
for
nearly
10
minutes
in
the
dark,
earning
applause
from
ZANU
PF
lawmakers
for
his
composure.

Power
was
restored
shortly
after
Mnangagwa
concluded
his
speech.

It
was
not
immediately
clear
whether
the
power
outage
was
caused
by
load-shedding
or
a
technical
fault.

“We
see
it
proper
that
we
apologise
to
the
President
for
the
power
outage.
We
shall
go
beyond
and
chase
the
culprit

“The
person
who
switched
off
electricity
while
the
President
was
speaking
will
regret
the
day
he
was
born,”
the
Speaker
of
Parliament,
Jacob
Mudenda,
said.

This
is
the
second
time
such
an
incident
has
occurred
during
the
President’s
address.

Power struggle erupts in BCC over move to dissolve key Committee

The
General
Purposes
Committee
is
one
of
Bulawayo’s
most
influential
committees,
overseeing
key
administrative
functions,
including
human
resources,
governance
and
oversight
of
the
Town
Clerk’s
office.

Sources
said
its
recent
refusal
to
extend
Dube’s
contract
reportedly
angered
sections
of
City
Hall.

The
motion
to
dissolve
the
existing
General
Purposes
Committee
was
submitted
by
Ward
6
Councillor
Nkosinathi
Hove
Mpofu
dated
October
24,
2025,
seeking
to
replace
its
members
with
a
new
line-up
of
councillors.

The
proposal
also
recommends
a
sweeping
reshuffle
of
chairpersons
across
multiple
committees,
including
the
Finance
and
Development,
Environmental
Management,
and
Health,
Housing
and
Education
committees,
including
himself
as
Vice
Chairperson
of
the
Future
Water
Supplies
and
Water
Action
Committee.

The
proposed
changes
would
see
new
chairpersons
appointed
to
six
key
committees:

Finance
and
Development
Committee:
Cllr
Dumisani
Nkomo,
Environmental
Management
Committee:
Cllr
Donaldson
Mabuto,
Town
Lands
and
Planning
Committee:
Cllr
Ashton
Mhlanga,
Future
Water
Supplies
Committee:
Cllr
Thandiwe
Moyo,
Health
Housing,
Education
Committee:
Cllr
Sikhululekile
Moyo
and
Audit
Committee:
Cllr
Aleck
Ndlovu.

Cllr
Mpofu’s
motion
was
supported
by
these
councillors,
Sikhululekile
Moyo
(WARD
17), Nokuthula 
Sibanda
(PR
CLLR), Josiah
Mutangi 
(Ward
1), Tavengwa
Zidya
Ward
24, Metelliah
Matunha (PR
CLLR)
Felix
Madzana
(WARD
18), Muziwakibo
Masuku 
(WARD
12), Mmeli
Moyo
(WARD
22), Lezina
Mohamad
(PR
CLLR), Donaldson
Mabutho 
(Ward
8),
Adrian
Rendani
Moyo
(WARD
9), Aston
Mhlanga
(WARD
15), Mxolisi
Mahlangu
(WARD
3), Susan
Sithole
(WARD
11), Tinevimbo
Maposa
(WARD
21)
and Lovewell
Mwinde
(Ward
13).

However,
some
councillors
and
council
insiders
view
the
move
as
part
of
a
calculated
effort
to
neutralise
dissenting
voices
following
the
committee’s
earlier
refusal
to
endorse
the
Town
Clerk’s
contract
renewal.

A
confidential
report
from
the
Chamber
Secretary’s
Department,
dated
27
October
2025,
highlights
a
major
procedural
flaw
in
Mpofu’s
motion,
also
noting
that
a
council
resolution
passed
on
7
August
2024,
extended
committee
terms
to
five
years
with
performance
reviews
after
two
years.

The
department
cautioned
there
is
a
significant
legislative
gap
in
the
Urban
Councils
Act
that
complicates
the
process
of
reviewing
and
reconstituting
standing
committees.

According
to
the
chamber
secretary’s
legal
analysis
presented
to
council,
Section
103
of
the
Urban
Councils
Act
was
amended,
removing
the
provision
that
previously
allowed
councils
to
review
and
reappoint
standing
committees
“in
August
in
any
year
in
which
the
general
election
of
Councillors
is
not
held.”

“I
am
of
the
view
that
this
is
a
very
serious
omission
by
the
Legislature,” 
stated
the
Chamber
Secretary
in
the
report.

“I
do
not
think
that
it
was
the
intention
of
the
Legislature
not
to
have
a
review
of
the
work
of
standing
committees
in
every
year
once
appointed.”

The
Chamber
Secretary 
reveals
that
Section
96(8)
of
the
Act,
which
mandates
annual
review
of
standing
committees’
work,
remains
in
force
but
now
refers
to
a
repealed
section
of
the
Act,
creating
an
impractical
situation
for
municipal
governance.

The
report
adds:
“The
appointment
of
Chairpersons
is
done
by
the
committee
concerned
and
not
Council.
If
all
committees
agreed
that
there
is
a
need
to
change
the
Chairperson,
then
they
should
follow
Section
96(6)
and
(7)
of
the
Urban
Councils
Act.
That
section
clearly
spells
out
how
a
chairperson
can
be
removed.”

According
to
Section
96(6)
of
the
Act,
“Every
Standing
Committee
shall,
at
its
first
meeting
after
the
appointment
of
the
members
thereto,
elect
one
of
its
members
to
be
Chairman
and
one
of
its
members
to
be
Vice-Chairman
thereof,
and
may
at
any
time,
if
the
person
elected
as
Chairman
or
Vice-Chairman
ceases
to
be
a
member
of
the
committee,
elect
a
member
to
replace
him.”

In
essence,
the
Chamber
Secretary’s
legal
interpretation
suggests
that
Council
itself
does
not
have
the
power
to
dissolve
or
replace
committee
chairpersons
at
will,
and
that
any
such
reshuffle
must
originate
from
within
the
committees
themselves.

In
his
submission,
Cllr
Mpofu
couched
the
motion
in
the
language
of
leadership
development
and
governance
reform.

“The
rotation
of
leadership
roles
amongst
Councillors
serves
as
a
salutary
mechanism
for
fostering
a
cadre
of
versatile
and
adept
leaders,
imbued
with
the
acumen
and
experiential
wisdom
garnered
through
active
participation
in
committee
work,”
he
said.

Mpofu
argued
that
regularly
rotating
councillors
between
leadership
positions
“cultivates
an
ethos
of
collective
capacity-building
and
personal
development,
thereby
enhancing
the
overall
efficacy
and
resilience
of
our
governance
structure.”

Despite
Mpofu’s
justifications,
the
Chamber
Secretary’s
comments
point
to
a
deeper
conflict
between
Council’s
political
ambitions
and
the
legal
boundaries
set
by
the
Urban
Councils
Act,
highlighting
the
council
can
make
recommendations
as
long
as
it
does
not
breach
the
Act.

The
controversy
is
further
complicated
by
events
from
August
7,
2024,
when
the
council
resolved
that
committee
memberships
and
chairpersons
would
serve
five-year
terms,
with
performance
reviews
every
two
years.
That
decision
stemmed
from
a
motion
by
Councillor
Ashton
Mhlanga,
which
was
supported
by
more
than
20
councillors.

At
that
meeting,
several
councillors
such
as
Moyo,
Mabuto,
Sibindi,
Mabeza,
Ndlovu,
including
Mpofu
himself,
debated
whether
long
tenures
improved
efficiency
or
entrenched
power.

The
Mayor,
Senator
David
Coltart,
at
that
meeting
highlighted
that
the
Urban
Councils
Act
did
not
mention
anything
on
the
term
of
Council
Committee
Chairpersons.

“It
should
also
be
noted
that
a
circular
or
directive
was
not
law.
Council
could
make
a
recommendation
as
long
as
it
was
not
in
breach
within
the
Urban
Councils
Act
Chapter
29:15.
Coltart
suggested
that
Committee
Chairpersons
be
evaluated
after
every
two
years,”
said
the
confidential
council
minutes.

Thereafter
the
council
resolved:
“(i)
That
the
term
of
office
for
Council
Committee
membership
and
Committee
Chairpersons
be
reviewed
to
a
period
of
five
years.
(ii)
That
Committee
Chairperson’s
performance
be
reviewed
after
every
two
years.”

These
confidential
minutes,
which
were
ordered
to
be
kept
off
public
record
“and
not
open
for
inspection
by
any
person
other
than
a
councillor
or
a
council
official” 
now
form
the
backdrop
against
which
Mpofu’s
latest
motion
is
being
interpreted,
not
as
a
governance
reform
effort,
but
as
a
politically
charged
counter-move.

Mnangagwa urges responsible mining and climate action in SONA

Delivering
the
2025
State
of
the
Nation
Address
(SONA)
before
Parliament
in
Harare,
Mnangagwa
warned
that
his
administration
would
act
against
investors
and
mining
operators
who
degrade
the
environment
or
harm
local
communities.

“My
Government
is
committed
to
weeding
out
irresponsible
mining
stakeholders
who
cause
pollution,
degrade
the
environment
and
damage
critical
infrastructure.
As
we
welcome
investors,
we
expect
them
to
respect
our
Constitution,
laws,
and
communities,”
he
said.

He
noted
that
the
Mines
and
Minerals
Amendment
Bill,
already
gazetted
and
expected
to
be
finalized
during
this
parliamentary
session,
will
strengthen
enforcement
mechanisms
and
hold
companies
accountable
for
environmental
rehabilitation
after
mining
operations.

Mnangagwa
said
investment
in
gold,
lithium,
iron
and
steel
projects
had
grown
significantly,
contributing
to
economic
expansion,
but
emphasised
that
such
growth
must
not
come
at
the
expense
of
ecological
integrity.

Turning
to
climate
change,
the
President
outlined
a
range
of
measures
aimed
at
improving
resilience
to
droughts,
floods,
and
other
extreme
weather
events.

“Through
the
Rural
Development
8.0
initiative,
the
drilling
and
rehabilitation
of
boreholes
is
improving
access
to
water
for
production,
village
business
units,
and
domestic
use,”
he
said.

According
to
Mnangagwa,
Zimbabwe’s
irrigation
coverage
has
increased
from
151,000
hectares
in
2019
to
221,000
hectares
in
2024,
with
a
national
target
of
496,000
hectares
to
safeguard
food
production
against
climate
shocks.

He
also
announced
the
adoption
of
the
National
Climate
Change
Adaptation
Plan
and
the
Carbon
Trading
Framework
and
Registry
under
Statutory
Instrument
48
of
2025,
which
he
said
would
mobilise
climate
finance
and
support
green
investments.

“In
response
to
climate
change,
my
Government
has
adopted
the
National
Climate
Change
Adaptation
Plan.
The
Carbon
Trading
Framework
and
Registry
will
help
attract
climate
finance
and
promote
mitigation
efforts
across
sectors,”
he
said.

Mnangagwa
further
underscored
the
need
for
greater
water
security,
describing
it
as
critical
to
energy
generation,
agriculture,
and
community
well-being.

“My
Government
is
scaling
up
integrated
water
resource
management
and
related
investments,”
he
said.

He
also
cited
ongoing
renewable
energy
initiatives,
including
Independent
Power
Producer
(IPP)
projects
and
the
Rural
Electrification
Programme,
which
he
said
are
expanding
access
to
clean
power,
particularly
in
rural
areas.

Police block Bulawayo meeting as Harare venue torched

The
Bulawayo
gathering,
titled “Constitutional
Crossroads:
Citizens
Respond
to
Zimbabwe’s
Constitutional
Crisis”
 was
shut
down
when
police
officers,
Zanu
PF
supporters
and
hired
bouncers
stationed
themselves
at
the
entrance
of
the
Bulawayo
Club,
preventing
journalists
and
invited
guests
from
entering.
Police
vehicles
were
also
seen
parked
outside
the
venue.

The
meeting
had
been
expected
to
feature
prominent
political
and
civic
figures,
among
them
ZAPU
leader
Sibangilizwe
Nkomo,
war
veterans’
representative
Ethan
Mathibela,
opposition
politicians
Prince
Dubeko
Sibanda
and
Lovemore
Moyo,
Mfulongatshi
Mpofu
of
the
Mthwakazi
Republic
Party,
Patrick
Tayiya
of
the
Democratic
Official
Party,
and
activists
Mbuso
Fuzwayo,
Thando
Gwinji,
Samkeliso
Tshuma,
Benon
Ncube
and
Silenkosi
Moyo.

Hours
earlier,
the
Southern
African
Political
Economy
Series
(SAPES)
Trust
offices
in
Harare,
where
a
parallel
event
was
scheduled,
were
gutted
in
a
suspected
arson
attack
shortly
after
midnight.

According
to
organisers,
unidentified
men
hurled
petrol
bombs
into
the
building,
destroying
the
seminar
room
where
the
press
conference
was
due
to
take
place.
The
assailants
reportedly
abducted
the
night
guard
and
locked
the
property’s
gates
with
new
padlocks
before
fleeing.

Later
in
the
morning,
another
fire
broke
out
at
the
Highfield
home
of
Gilbert
Bgwende,
a
member
of
the
Constitutional
Defence
Forum,
deepening
fears
of
a
wider
campaign
to
intimidate
voices
critical
of
the
government.

The
Harare
press
conference
was
to
be
addressed
by
opposition
and
civil
society
leaders
including
Job
Sikhala,
Tendai
Biti,
Jacob
Ngarivhume,
and
Jameson
Timba.
They
were
expected
to
condemn
what
they
describe
as
a
Zanu
PF-driven
attempt
to
unconstitutionally
extend
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa’s
term
beyond
2028.

The
developments
come
just
weeks
after
the
ruling
party’s
annual
conference
in
Mutare
passed
a
resolution
directing
Parliament
to
consider
legislative
amendments
allowing
Mnangagwa
to
remain
in
office
until
2030,
a
move
that
has
triggered
widespread
political
and
public
backlash.

In
a
strongly
worded
statement,
the
Zimbabwe
Communist
Party
(ZCP)
condemned
the
bombings
and
blockades
as
“cowardly
acts”
and
“an
assault
on
the
working
class
and
peasantry’s
right
to
organise
and
express
themselves.”

“The
Zimbabwe
Republic
Police
must
immediately
investigate,
arrest,
and
prosecute
those
responsible,”
the
ZCP
said.
“The
working
class
and
peasantry
have
every
right
to
engage,
assemble
and
speak
on
matters
that
affect
their
lives.”

The
party
also
rejected
the
proposal
to
extend
Mnangagwa’s
presidency,
calling
it
“a
manipulation
of
the
Constitution
to
prolong
the
rule
of
a
corrupt
elite.”

“Zimbabwe
is
not
Zanu
PF.
The
power
to
rule
does
not
come
from
a
party
or
a
person
but
from
the
working
class
and
peasantry
whose
labour
sustains
the
nation,”
the
statement
read.

“Two
more
years
will
not
rebuild
Zimbabwe;
it
will
only
prolong
the
suffering
of
ordinary
people.
Our
struggle
is
not
about
personalities

it
is
about
class
power.
It
is
a
struggle
between
those
who
produce
and
those
who
plunder.”

The
ZCP
urged
citizens
to
unite
“in
defence
of
their
democratic
right
to
elect
their
representatives”
and
to
“complete
the
liberation
struggle
by
dismantling
the
neo-colonial
and
feudal
systems
that
continue
to
oppress
them.”

What Do You Mean 3 or 7 Years? – See Also – Above the Law

DOJ
Attorneys
Casually
Assume
Third
Trump
Term
At
Oral
Argument:
That’s
plainly
unconstitutional.
Did
They
Outsource
Editing
Too?:
Embarrassed
Biglaw
firm
submits
filing
full
of
AI
hallucinations.
(Halloween)
Clothing
Optional:
SDNY
Judge
opts
for
a
seasonally
appropriate
business
casual
dress
code
this
Friday.
District
Judge
Makes
It
Very
Clear
That
ICE
Doesn’t
Tear
Gas
Kids
In
Costumes:
Damn
shame
they
need
the
reminder.
Catch
Up
On
Dateline:
‘Deadly
Mischief’
takes
the
viewer
on
a
tour
of
the
Donna
Adelson
conspiracy
case.