Churches lead Bulawayo clean-up drive

The
campaign
forms
part
of
the
National
Clean-Up
Day
initiative,
established
in
2018
to
promote
a
clean,
safe
and
healthy
environment.

Speaking
to
CITE
ahead
of
the
exercise,
ZCC
national
chairperson
Reverend
Mbongeni
P
Dube
said
the
initiative
was
inspired
by
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa’s
declaration
that
environmental
cleanliness
should
be
treated
as
a
national
priority.

“From
the
Zimbabwe
Council
of
Churches,
mainly
this
clean-up
campaign
is
on
the
foundation
of
the
president,
Ed
Mnangagwa,
who
declared
in
December
2018
that
there
should
be
a
clean,
safe
and
healthy
environment
which
we
can
manage,”
he
said.

Reverend
Dube
said
churches
in
Bulawayo
had
agreed
to
work
collectively
and
in
partnership
with
other
organisations
to
support
the
city’s
cleanliness
drive.

“As
churches
we
sat
down
and
we
saw
fit
that
we
should
join
together
to
clean
Bulawayo
and
to
unite
with
other
organisations
such
as
the
city
council
and
many
others,”
he
said.

He
added
that
the
campaign
had
drawn
broad-based
support
from
different
religious
groups
and
civic
organisations.

“We
have
also
united
with
the
Muslim
community,
the
Latter-day
Saints,
and
vendors’
associations
as
well.
They
are
part
of
us,
so
a
lot
of
organisations
have
come
on
board,”
he
said.

Reverend
Dube
said
the
church
felt
compelled
to
lead
by
example,
describing
environmental
stewardship
as
part
of
its
moral
and
spiritual
responsibility.

“The
Bible
says
we
are
the
light
and
the
salt
of
the
earth,
so
as
churches
we
need
to
lead
by
example
as
we
clean
our
Bulawayo,”
he
said.

He
added
that
the
initiative
was
rooted
in
Christian
teaching
that
humanity
has
a
duty
to
care
for
the
earth.

“Our
theology
is
that
God
gave
us
a
mandate
to
take
care
of
the
garden.
So
we
have
been
given
Bulawayo,
this
is
where
we
eat,
this
is
where
we
work

and
God
reminds
us
to
take
care
of
this
garden
that
we
have
been
given,”
he
said.

The
clean-up
will
take
place
at
the
Unity
Village
entrance
along
6th
Avenue,
starting
at
7am
and
ending
at
10am.
Reverend
Dube
said
the
campaign
is
open
to
all
residents.

“So
this
has
been
our
initiative.
Everyone
has
been
invited
to
this
clean-up
campaign,”
he
said.

Beyond
the
immediate
exercise,
the
ZCC
hopes
to
roll
out
community
workshops
to
raise
awareness
about
proper
waste
management
and
the
dangers
of
littering.

“It
is
our
hope
that
as
we
go
forward
we
will
have
workshops
to
teach
people
on
the
harmful
effects
of
littering,
because
sometimes
people
are
ignorant
about
what
they
are
supposed
to
do,”
he
said.

The
campaign
comes
against
the
backdrop
of
growing
concern
by
the
Bulawayo
City
Council
over
illegal
dumping,
which
it
has
described
as
a
“cancer”
spreading
across
the
city.

Late
last
year,
council
officials
said
they
were
considering
increasing
littering
fines
by
up
to
900%
in
a
bid
to
deter
offenders.
Proposals
include
raising
the
maximum
fine
for
illegal
dumping
from
US$30
to
US$300.

Bulawayo
Mayor
David
Coltart
has
also
urged
authorities
to
target
construction
companies
and
businesses
that
dump
waste
illegally,
suggesting
penalties
of
around
US$300
per
tonne,
arguing
that
it
should
be
more
expensive
to
dump
illegally
than
to
use
official
landfill
sites.

President
Mnangagwa
has
previously
noted
that
Zimbabwe’s
Constitution
guarantees
every
citizen
the
right
to
a
clean
and
safe
environment
that
does
not
harm
their
health
and
wellbeing.
He
declared
the
first
Friday
of
every
month
National
Clean-Up
Day
in
December
2018.

Anthropic Enters Legal Tech, Legal Tech Enters Freefall – Above the Law

It
wasn’t
1929
for
the
legal
tech
industry,
but
it
wasn’t
great
either.
Thomson
Reuters
lost
around
15
percent
of
its
value.
LexisNexis’s
parent
company
dropped
about
14
percent.
DocuSign
fell
11
percent.
A
lot
of
the
industry
isn’t
publicly
traded,
so
we
didn’t
get
to
see
how
their
investors
responded
to
the
news,
but
it
probably
looked
similarly
grim
over
at
Harvey
HQ.

The
catalyst
for
this
carnage

which
the
Jefferies
Group
is
calling
the
SaaSpocalypse

had
nothing
to
do
with
the
ongoing
hallucination
and
slopification
problems
unleashed
by
artificial
intelligence.
We’ve
had
those
for
months
now
and
they’ve
only
succeeded
in
inflating
the
tech
bubble
further.
Instead,
the
precipitous
decline
arrived
because
Anthropic
released
a
plugin.

And
threatened
to
take
over
legal
tech
in
the
process.

The
company
behind
Claude
has
been
riding
high
recently
off
its
Claude
Code
buzz.
The
company
reportedly

used
their
fancy
coding
agent
to
write
up
Claude
Cowork
,
offering
more
user-friendly
access
to
its
agentic
properties.
Yesterday,
they
dropped
a

legal
plugin

for
Cowork,
promising
to
automate
a
number
of
legal
workflows
from
contracts
to
briefings.
It’s
open
source
and
therefore
configurable
to
meet
whatever
shop
idiosyncrasies
a
firm
wants
to
include.


As
Bob
Ambrogi
put
it
:

For
the
first
time,
a
foundation-model
company
is
packaging
a
legal
workflow
product
directly
into
its
platform,
rather
than
merely
supplying
an
API
to
legal-tech
vendors.

Therein
lies
the
problem
for
every
legal
AI
company
that’s
been
building
on
top
of
Anthropic
all
this
time.

For
years,
the
legal
tech
playbook
has
been
straightforward:
take
a
foundation
model
from
Anthropic
or
OpenAI,
wrap
it
in
legal-specific
prompts
and
guardrails,
add
some
integrations,
slap
a
subscription
fee
on
it,
and
call
yourself
a
legal
AI
company.
The
assumption
was
that
the
model
providers
would
stay
in
their
lane,
happy
to
collect
API
fees
while
legal
tech
startups
captured
enterprise
value.

Anthropic
just
announced
“I
can
haz
enterprise
value.”

What’s
legal
tech
going
to
do
now
that
their
supplier
is
their
competitor?
Personally,
I’d
prefer
tools
designed
by
professionals
with
industry
experience
as
opposed
to
a
plugin
built
by
a
robot
coder.
But
this
is
where
AI’s
persistent
limitations
work
against
companies
adding
value.
If
it’s
going
to
hallucinate
so
much
that
lawyers
need
to
review
it
with
a
fine-tooth
comb
either
way,
why
not
use
the
retail
solution?

Well,
a
lot
of
reasons.
As

Artificial
Lawyer
noted
,
legal
data
titans
have
spent
decades
building
proprietary
datasets
and
customer
relationships
that
can’t
be
easily
replicated
by
a
plugin.
As
Prompt
Armor
notes,
Cowork
also
brings

serious
security
risks

that
everyone
seems
to
be
shrugging
off
at
their
peril.
That
said,
when
an
industry
is
built
on
a
“model
+
wrapper
+
workflow”
model

as
Ambrogi
calls
it

if
the
model
creator
can
cut
out
the
middle,
it
creates
a
crisis.
Even
if
most
lawyers
stick
with
the
old
standbys,
at
least

some

chunk
of
the
market
will
walk
away
from
high
fees
and
give
Claude
a
whirl.

Legal
tech
companies
have
been

hyping
“agentic
AI”

as
the
future
for
a
year
now
without
a
whole
lot
to
show
for
it.
Now
a
foundation
model
company
is
releasing
an
agentic
legal
tool,
and
suddenly
the
market
decides
that
democratizing
legal
AI
could
also
democratize
legal
tech’s
customer
base
into
oblivion.

But
major
law
firms
and
legal
departments
already
have
deals
with
sophisticated
vendors
they’re
not
going
to
abandon
overnight.
They
still
need
the
massive
datasets
offered
by
Thomson
Reuters
and
LexisNexis,
which
should
keep
most
customers
signed
up
for
now.

And,
as
someone
who
has
experimented
with
Claude
Cowork
a
lot
over
the
past
two
weeks,
there’s
also
the
way
that
it
screws
up
most
workflows
that
involve
more
than
a
couple
tasks.
That’s
not
to
say
there
aren’t
success
stories
floating
around
out
there,
but
to
the
extent
I’ve
been
able
to
put
it
through
its
paces,
the
results
have
been…
underwhelming.
Maybe
pump
the
brakes
before
putting
your
contract
workflow
in
there.

If
investors
think
lawyers
will
walk
away
from
Thomson
Reuters
and
put
their
faith
in
a
plugin
for
a
product
written
by
a
robot
coder
over
the
last
couple
weeks…
well,
then
the
market
may
be
the
one
with
the
problem.




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Passengers stung by bees after bus crashes into tree in Harare

HARARE

Dozens
of
passengers
escaped
death
when
a
bus
crashed
into
a
tree
in
Harare
on
Tuesday
morning,
but
their
ordeal
took
a
dramatic
turn
when
they
were
attacked
by
a
swarm
of
bees,
police
said.

The
accident
occurred
at
the
intersection
of
Acturus
Road
and
Harare
Drive.

National
police
spokesperson
Commissioner
Paul
Nyathi
said
the
driver
lost
control
of
the
bus,
causing
it
to
veer
off
the
road
and
ram
into
a
tree
that
had
a
swarm
of
bees.

“Several
passengers
sustained
injuries
while
others
were
attacked
by
bees
from
the
tree,”
Nyathi
said
in
a
statement
on
Wednesday.

Emergency
services
attended
the
scene
and
ferried
the
injured
to
nearby
medical
facilities
for
treatment.
The
police
statement
did
not
disclose
the
extent
of
the
injuries.

Police find human skulls, remains at home of Bindura man arrested over dummy pistol

HARARE

Police
have
arrested
a
28-year-old
man
after
discovering
human
skulls
and
other
remains
at
his
home
following
an
initial
arrest
at
a
mine
in
Bindura.

Police
confirmed
the
arrest
of
Alfred
Chinjiva,
28,
who
was
first
apprehended
on
February
2,
2026,
for
possession
of
articles
of
criminal
use
after
he
was
found
carrying
a
dummy
pistol
at
a
mine
in
Bindura.

Following
the
arrest,
detectives
conducted
a
search
at
Chinjiva’s
residence
in
Chipandura
Park,
where
they
made
a
gruesome
discovery
of
suspected
human
remains.

Police
recovered
two
human
skulls,
one
of
which
had
two
cuts
at
the
back
and
was
wrapped
in
a
yellow
cloth,
while
the
other
was
wrapped
in
a
red
cloth.

Officers
also
found
a
single
bone
wrapped
in
a
red
cloth,
two
buckets
containing
bones
wrapped
in
green,
yellow,
black
and
blue
cloths,
as
well
as
three
plastic
containers
filled
with
soil
mixed
with
suspected
human
bones
and
hair.

One
of
the
skulls
found
at
Bindura
man’s
home

Police
said
investigations
are
ongoing
to
establish
the
origin
of
the
remains
and
whether
any
criminal
offences,
including
murder
or
grave
desecration,
were
committed.

“More
details
will
be
released
as
investigations
progress,”
national
police
spokesman
Commissioner
Paul
Nyathi
said.

A
human’s
lower
jaw
among
items
recovered
at
Bindura
man’s
home
Human
remains
found
at
home
of
man
arrested
for
carrying
toy
gun

High Court stops chief from blocking opening of Masvingo private school

MASVINGO

The
High
Court
has
interdicted
a
Masvingo
traditional
chief
from
interfering
with
the
operations
of
a
newly
established
private
school
after
finding
that
his
actions
amounted
to
unlawful
self-help
rather
than
the
lawful
exercise
of
traditional
authority.

Justice
Josephine
Zisengwe
of
the
Masvingo
High
Court
granted
an
urgent
interim
interdict
barring
Chief
Murinye,
real
name
Ephias
Munodawafa,
from
blocking
access
to
Riverton
Academy
Extension,
a
private
school
located
in
the
Murinye
and
Machingura
villages,
following
a
dramatic
standoff
at
the
start
of
the
January
2026
school
term.

The
court
heard
that
on
January
11,
Munodawafa
physically
blocked
the
road
leading
to
the
school
with
his
vehicle,
preventing
parents
from
dropping
off
children
who
had
already
been
enrolled.

The
chief
allegedly
threatened
to
unleash
snakes
on
the
school
premises
to
stop
lessons
from
commencing.

The
school’s
owner,
Philimon
Mutangiri,
approached
the
High
Court
on
an
urgent
basis
seeking
protection
from
what
he
described
as
vigilante-style
conduct
by
the
chief.

In
opposing
the
application,
Munodawafa
argued
that
the
school
had
been
constructed
on
communal
land
without
his
authority,
without
approval
from
Masvingo
Rural
District
Council,
and
without
compliance
with
statutory
requirements
including
an
environmental
impact
assessment.

He
maintained
that,
as
chief,
he
was
empowered
under
the
Traditional
Leaders
Act
to
prevent
unauthorised
settlement
on
communal
land.

Justice
Zisengwe
rejected
that
argument,
holding
that
while
chiefs
wield
significant
administrative
and
judicial
authority,
they
are
not
above
the
law.

“At
its
most
basic
form
the
principle
of
the
rule
of
law
propounds
that
everyone,
including
the
government,
is
accountable
to
publicly
available
and
equally
enforced
laws
that
are
independently
judged,”
the
judge
said.

She
ruled
that
Munodawafa
could
not
“arrogate
unto
himself
the
role
of
complainant,
judge,
jury
and
executioner
in
his
own
case,”
adding
that
even
if
he
believed
the
school
was
unlawfully
established,
the
law
provided
formal
mechanisms
for
enforcement.

“The
provisions
relied
upon
do
not
necessarily
permit
taking
matters
into
one’s
own
hands,”
Zisengwe
said,
noting
that
customary
court
judgments
must
be
enforced
through
procedures
set
out
in
the
Customary
Law
and
Local
Courts
Act,
not
by
physical
obstruction.

The
judge
dismissed
a
series
of
preliminary
objections
raised
by
the
chief,
including
claims
that
the
application
was
defective,
that
he
had
been
wrongly
cited
in
his
personal
capacity,
and
that
a
court
could
not
interdict
what
he
characterised
as
a
lawful
act.
Several
of
those
objections
were
deemed
abandoned
after
they
were
not
pursued
in
heads
of
argument.

On
the
merits,
the
court
found
that
Mutangiri
had
established
a
prima
facie
right
to
the
peaceful
operation
of
the
school,
even
though
compliance
with
all
regulatory
requirements
remained
in
dispute.

“The
applicant
did
not
construct
the
school
from
the
utter
blue,”
Zisengwe
said,
noting
that
land
had
initially
been
allocated
by
local
headmen
and
that
applications
and
fees
had
been
submitted
to
the
rural
district
council.

The
judge
held
that
the
balance
of
convenience
favoured
allowing
the
school
to
operate,
warning
that
continued
interference
would
cause
irreparable
harm
to
learners
by
depriving
them
of
learning
time
that
could
not
be
recovered.

Pending
final
determination
of
the
matter,
the
court
interdicted
Munodawafa
and
those
acting
through
him
from
blocking
access
roads
or
interfering
in
any
way
with
learning
and
other
operations
at
Riverton
Academy
Extension.

Visiting My Old Law School In The Twin Cities To Mourn A Friend And Curse ICE At A Soulless Hockey Game – Above the Law

ice
hockey
goalkeeper
blocking
a
shot

I
recently
lost
a
good
friend.
Men
and
women
I’ve
known
since
we
were
boys
and
girls
poured
into
my
Minnesota
hometown
for
the
funeral
last
Friday,
some
from
as
far
away
as
the
coasts.
Outside
the
church,
at
the
crack
of
the
rifles
for
his
military
honors,
a
tear
ran
down
my
cheek
and
promptly
froze
into
the
upper
reaches
of
my
beard.
He
will
be
greatly
missed.

Mitch
had
been
a
staple
at
a
longstanding
tradition
amongst
a
group
of
his
peers:
hockey
weekend.
This
tradition
entails
everyone
meeting
up
from
wherever
they’ve
ended
up
in
the
country
then
going
somewhere
for
the
weekend
to
attend
a
Minnesota
college
hockey
game
(not
necessarily
in
Minnesota,
the
Dakotas
and
other
nearby
states
are
in
the
mix
too).
We
also
gear
up
like
old
times
and
attempt
to
play
a
hockey
game
ourselves.

Since
we’d
planned
this
year’s
hockey
weekend
for
the
Twin
Cities
several
months
ago,
and
since
almost
everyone
going
was
at
the
funeral
anyway,
we
decided
to
go
ahead
with
it.
In
the
past,
outdoor
ice
conditions
had
occasionally
prevented
us
from
doing
the
amateur
hockey
game
part
of
hockey
weekend.
Though
we
are
all
citizens,
the
skin
tones
of
a
couple
of
our
buddies
nonetheless
served
as
a
compelling
reminder
that
outdoor
ICE
conditions
in
the
Twin
Cities
merited
a
postponement
of
that
part
of
the
tradition.

We
would
still
watch
a
college
hockey
game,
though.
This
year
we
were
traveling
to
the
St.
Paul
campus
of
my
old
law
school
alma
mater
to
see

its
brand
new
stadium
.

Of
course,
a
dozen
hockey
hooligans
need
a
hearty
meal
and
a
few
rounds
with
which
to
toast
their
fallen
compadre
before
watching
any
competitive
athletics.
We
headed
to
Tiffany’s
(the
local
sports
bar,
not
the
fancy
jewelry
store).

We
arrived
at
sunset
to
the
large
four-way
intersection
where
Tiffany’s
is.
A
group
of
several
hundred
anti-ICE
protesters
braved
the
cold
to
gather
there.
Wanting
to
show
my
support
(especially
given
that
a
little
toasting
had
already
taken
place),
as
we
crossed
at
the
stoplight
I
formed
a
megaphone
with
my
hands
and
yelled
as
loudly
as
I
could,
“FUCK
ICE!!”

My
breath
boiled
from
my
body
and
whipped
away
in
the
wind.
The
intersection
was
big
enough
that
it
took
a
couple
seconds
for
the
sound
to
reach
every
corner,
and
for
the
applause
and
cheering
to
make
its
way
back
to
me.
Encouraged,
I
reared
back
again,
and
this
time
bellowed,
“FUCK
BOVINO!!”

It
was
a
cool
moment.
As
I
write
this
two
days
later
it
still
sounds
like
I’ve
been
taking
voice
lessons
from
RFK
Jr.
whenever
I
try
to
speak

totally
worth
it.

When
we
finally
arrived
at
the
game
(a
little
late
for
puck-drop),
another
wave
of
sound
hit
us
as
we
found
our
way
to
our
seats.
We
assumed
the
home
team
had
scored
a
goal,
only
to
discover
it
was
the
visiting
fans
of
the

Michigan
Tech
Huskies

who’d
generated
such
a
robust
roar.

This
was
not
an
isolated
incident.
Lots
of
Michigan
Tech
students
made
the
long
journey
to
cheer
on
their
team.
On
the
other
hand,
I
saw
almost
no
one
who
wasn’t
on
the
ice
who
I’d
take
to
be
student-aged
wearing
a
Tommies
jersey.
Most
of
the
hometown
fans
seemed
to
be
stoney-faced
older
white
men.
Though
the
hockey
was
competitive,
the
energy
advantage
was
overwhelmingly
in
favor
of
the
Huskies.

It
probably
didn’t
help
that
the
stadium
was
half-empty.
It
was
a
beautiful
building,
though
one,
as
we
soon
discovered,
in
which
an
attendee
of
the
proper
age
had
no
ability
to
purchase
an
alcoholic
beverage.
To
see
a
hockey
arena
without
beer
in
Minnesota
was
almost
akin
to
encountering
a
panda
bear
on
the
streets
of
St.
Paul:
the
vague
familiarity
of
the
shape
isn’t
necessarily
out-of-place,
but
the
overall
picture
is
uncanny
and
somehow
wrong.

I
took
a
walk
to
clear
my
head
and
find
the
manager
in
charge
of
the
Jumbotron
to
see
if
he’d
flash
“Goodbye,
Mitch”
briefly
on
the
screen.
This
request
was
denied.

I
mean,
fine,
it’s
not
the
end
of
the
world,
but
I
wasn’t
asking
for
a
10-minute
video
tribute
or
anything.
Two
words
of
text
for
a
few
seconds
didn’t
seem
completely
unreasonable
as
a
favor
to
an
alum
who’d
walked
in
accompanied
by
a
meaningful
percentage
of
the
whole
crowd
at
$35
a
ticket.
I
could
have
missed
it,
I
suppose,
but
as
the
game
went
on
I
saw
no
acknowledgement
of
the
other

two
great
Minnesotans
we
lost

this
month
either,
whereas
an
earlier
event
that
day
at
the
History
Center
in
St.
Paul
that
a
few
of
us
had
planned
on
going
to
was
canceled
entirely
due
to
the
federal
occupation
of
the
metro
area.

By
the
time
we
left
the
game
(early)
I
found
myself
cheering
for
the
Huskies.
I
spent
about
a
week
in
Houghton
versus
three
years
in
law
school,
and
by
the
end
this
hockey
game
caused
me
to
shamefully
pocket
the
St.
Thomas
stocking
cap
and
mittens
I’d
been
wearing.

Well,
all
things
considered
it
was
a
great
weekend
which
featured
a
lot
of
great
tributes
to
my
friend,
and
which
could
have
turned
out
a
lot
worse
considering
how
masked
federal
goons
have
been
needlessly
abusing
protesters
and
bystanders
alike
in
the
Twin
Cities
these
past
few
weeks.
Still,
that
hockey
game
was
a
definite
lowlight.
Hopefully
next
year
we’ll
be
somewhere
else
for
hockey
weekend,
maybe
with
something
to
celebrate
instead
of
someone
to
mourn,
and
maybe
even
in
a
city
that
isn’t
besieged
by
the
federal
government.




Jonathan
Wolf
is
a
civil
litigator
and
author
of 
Your
Debt-Free
JD
 (affiliate
link).
He
has
taught
legal
writing,
written
for
a
wide
variety
of
publications,
and
made
it
both
his
business
and
his
pleasure
to
be
financially
and
scientifically
literate.
Any
views
he
expresses
are
probably
pure
gold,
but
are
nonetheless
solely
his
own
and
should
not
be
attributed
to
any
organization
with
which
he
is
affiliated.
He
wouldn’t
want
to
share
the
credit
anyway.
He
can
be
reached
at 
[email protected].

Donald Trump Calls Leonard Leo A ‘Sleazebag’… Again – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Evan
Vucci-Pool/Getty
Images)

The
president
took
a
break
from
overseeing
a
domestic
occupation,
issuing
threats
to
Iran,
and
pretending
he’s
not
deeply
implicated
in
the
latest
Epstein
file
dump.
Speaking
of
dumps,
Trump
finds
himself
so
overburdened
these
days
that
he’s
taken
his

capacity
for
multitasking
to
extreme
levels
.
And
yet
he
still
has
time
for
his
passion
project:
authoring
a
real-time
record
of
his
sundowning
through
his
vanity
social
media
outlet.

Yesterday,
his
ire
fell
upon
Federalist
Society
bigwig
Leonard
Leo,
whom
Trump
considers
a
sleazebag.

That’s
the
most
powerful
person
on
Earth
blasting
his
rage
wank
to
millions
of
followers
about
the
“big
and
very
dangerous
mouth”
on
an
“influencer”
so
notoriously
behind
the
scenes
that
almost
no
one
outside
the
legal
nerd
cult
even
knows
who
he
is.

This
is
not
the
first
time
Trump’s
lashed
out
at
Leo.
Last
year,
when
the
Court
of
International
Trade
struck
down
Trump’s
attempt
to
unilaterally
issue
tariffs
on
products
from
everywhere
up
to
and
including

an
uninhabited
penguin
reserve
,
the
president

took
to
social
media
to
bash
Leo
as
a
“sleazebag.”

Who
are
we
to
argue
with
the
president?

While
Trump
complains
about
Leo
claiming
the
legal
system
is
“RIGGED”
his
actual
complaint
seems
to
be
the
possibility
that
it
is
not.

Having
railed
against
Leo
when
the
Trade
court
ruled
against
the
illegal
tariff
regime,
he’s
back
at
it
now
that
the
Supreme
Court

generally
exceedingly
compliant
to
the
administration’s
whims

appears
likely
to
break
with
the
White
House
on
both
tariffs
and
his
attempt
to
seize
control
of
the
Federal
Reserve.
Add
in
the
various
Republican
judges
around
the
country
refusing
to
allow
the
administration
to
run
roughshod
over
the
Constitution,
and
Trump
might
feel
genuinely
misled.

Still,
it’s
a
weird
complaint
to
air
in
public
when
Trump
has
three
more
years
to
work
and
no
viable
alternative
for
vetting
judicial
nominees.
The
Federalist
Society
manages
the
MAGA

cursus
honorum

and
cutting
ties
with
the
group
leaves
the
administration
picking
judges
based
on
vibes.
Presumably
Leo

directly
or
indirectly

guided
the
administration
in
choosing
the
FedSoc
all-stars
most
willing
to
embrace
the
president’s
agenda
as
opposed
to
the
squishy
libertarians
only
showing
up
for
low
taxes
and
free
Chick-fil-A.

But
it’s
a
reminder
that
the
White
House’s
obsession
with
loyalty
remains
a
one-way
street.
No
amount
of
obsequious
service
will
ever
be
enough
to
satisfy
Trump.
Presumably,
Leo
doesn’t
really
care.
He
managed
substantially
stock
the
courts
with
enough
low-hanging
fruit
to
deliver

activist-friendly
one-judge
courthouses

and

appellate
courts
more
interested
in
clicks
than
laws

that
will
pay
off
for
ages.
They
may
not

always

deliver
for
Trump,
but
when
they
don’t
they’re
just
delivering
for
traditional
Republican
values.
Leo’s
success
will
outlast
Trump.


Earlier
:

Donald
Trump
Rips
Federalist
Society,
Calls
Leonard
Leo
A
‘Sleazebag’




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Is President Trump’s $10B Lawsuit Against The IRS Legitimate Despite Being Both The Plaintiff And The Defendant? – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Win
McNamee/Getty
Images)

On
January
29,
2026,
President
Donald
Trump,
along
with
his
sons
Donald
Jr.
and
Eric,
and
the
Trump
Organization,
filed
a
lawsuit
in
the
U.S.
District
Court
for
the
Southern
District
of
Florida
against
the
Internal
Revenue
Service
(IRS)
and
the
Treasury
Department.
The
suit
seeks
at
least
$10
billion
in
damages
due
to
reputational
harm,
financial
losses,
and
public
embarrassment.

The
suit
alleges
that
the
agencies
failed
to
prevent
the
unauthorized
leak
of
their
confidential
tax
returns
by
Charles
Littlejohn
between
2018
and
2020.
Littlejohn,
who
pleaded
guilty
in
2023
and
was
sentenced
to
five
years
in
prison,
disclosed
the
information
to
outlets
like
The
New
York
Times
and
ProPublica,
revealing
details
such
as
Trump’s
minimal
tax
payments
in
several
years.

However,
this
unprecedented
action
of
a
sitting
president
suing
his
own
executive
branch
raises
legal
and
ethical
conflict
of
interest
questions.
Can
this
lawsuit
succeed?
Can
the
lawsuit
proceed
fairly
for
both
sides?

First,
the
lawsuit
could
be
dismissed
before
it
gets
to
trial.
The
statute
of
limitations
allows
taxpayers
to
sue
for
unauthorized
disclosures
but
requires
claims
to
be
filed
within
two
years
after
the
date
of
discovery.
The
Trump
complaint
argues
that
the
clock
began
for
President
Trump
in
January
29,
2024
(exactly
two
years
before
the
lawsuit
was
filed),
when
the
IRS
formally
notified
him
of
the
breach
via
letter.
However,
considering
that
the
leaked
returns

date
back
to
September
2020
,
it
is
arguable
that
he
should
have
known
about
it
then.
Since
Trump
was
the
sitting
president
at
the
time,
the
IRS
could
have
notified
Trump
as
soon
as
it
knew
his
returns
were
leaked.

Assuming
Trump
succeeds
on
the
statute
of
limitations
issue,
he
will
have
to
prove
actual
damages
sufficient
to
justify
the
$10
billion
he
is
demanding.
The
suit
alleges
broad
harms
like
tarnished
business
reputations
and
negative
public
standing,
but
quantifying
these
will
be
difficult.
The
leaking
of
the
tax
returns
did
not
seem
to
have
hurt
him
financially.
Also,
his
winning
the
2024
presidential
election
could
undermine
claims
of
diminished
public
standing.
And
assuming
he
can
prove
financial
losses
or
tarnished
business
reputations,
the
government
could
argue
that
any
damages
were
self-inflicted
considering
that
Trump
has
made
numerous
bombastic
and
sometimes
offensive
statements
over
the
years.

Lastly,
the
statute
provides
that
an
officer
or
employee
of
the
United
States
must
be
responsible
for
the
unauthorized
disclosure.
The
government
could
argue
that
Littlejohn
was
a
contractor
employed
by
Booz
Allen
Hamilton,
which
could
raise
questions
about
whether
Littlejohn
was
a
direct
IRS
employee.

Because
Trump
could
potentially
control
both
sides
of
the
litigation,
it
can
create
a
conflict
of
interest
situation,
especially
where
Trump
can
simply
order
the
Treasury
Department
to
concede
the
case
and
award
Trump
whatever
amount
he
wants.
The
generally
accepted
way
to
mitigate
this
is
to
have
the
Department
of
Justice
appoint
independent
counsel
to
represent
the
government.
The
judge
assigned
to
the
case
cannot
appoint
a
special
independent
counsel
to
represent
the
government.

But
since
Trump
seems
to
value
loyalty
to
him
more
than
anything
else,
any
special
counsel
Attorney
General
Pam
Bondi
appoints
will
be
scrutinized
with
great
skepticism.
He
will
also
be
the
butt
of
every
talk
show
host’s
opening
monologue.
Yes,
that
includes
Greg
Gutfeld.

One
option
suggested
was
to
let
the
lawsuit
proceed
but
have
the
judge
schedule
the
trial
date
after
Trump
leaves
office
and
reject
questionable
settlements
offered
while
Trump
is
in
office.
If
Trump’s
successor
in
2029
happens
to
be
someone
who
worked
closely
with
him

such
as
JD
Vance
or
Marco
Rubio

any
settlement
offers
made
during
their
tenure
should
also
be
approved
by
the
court.
The
problem
with
this
strategy
is
that

Rule
41(a)(ii)

of
the
Federal
Rules
of
Civil
Procedure
allows
dismissal
of
a
lawsuit
without
court
approval
if
both
parties
agree
to
the
dismissal.

Another
suggested
option
was
to
have
a
third
party

intervene

in
the
litigation
to
ensure
that
the
federal
government’s
interests
are
independently
protected.
While
the
intervention
rules
are
beyond
the
scope
of
this
column,
it
should
be
known
that
the
potential

intervenor
must
have
standing

to
sue.
To
have

standing
,
the
intervenor
must
have
concrete,
particularized,
actual
or
imminent
injury
fairly
traceable
to
a
party’s
conduct
which
can
only
be
remedied
by
a
court.
An
individual
will
not
have
standing
simply
because
he
or
she
is
a
taxpayer
or
because
they
are
concerned
about
the
potential
conflict
of
interest.

When
Trump
was
asked
about
the
potential
conflict
of
interest,
he

said

he
is
considering
giving
a
substantial
portion
of
the
lawsuit
proceeds
to
charity.
That
raises
numerous
questions,
such
as
whether
Trump
actually
will
give
the
money
to
charity,
and
to
which
ones.
Also,
if
it
is
supposedly
not
about
the
money,
why
is
this
lawsuit
necessary,
especially
when
Trump
can
direct
the
IRS
to
improve
its
security
protocols
to
ensure
this
does
not
happen
again?

The
Trump
family’s
lawsuit
should
be
allowed
to
proceed.
While
many
people
would
find
the
lawsuit
preposterous,
it
is
not
frivolous.
But
President
Trump’s
position
of
being
both
the
plaintiff
and
the
defendant’s
boss
makes
this
lawsuit
look
sketchy
due
to
the
conflict
of
interest.
It
is
not
a
slam
dunk
case
because
President
Trump
has
a
statute
of
limitations
issue
and
the
Trumps
may
not
have
suffered
damages
worth
$10
billion.
Because
of
this,
the
parties
must
be
adversarial
to
ensure
that
any
resolution

settlement
or
otherwise

is
fair
to
the
taxpayers.
Accordingly,
both
sides
should
agree
to
rules
to
ensure
there
is
no
conflict
of
interest,
ideally
by
appointing
a
reputable
independent
counsel
to
represent
the
government.




Steven
Chung
is
a
tax
attorney
in
Los
Angeles,
California.
He
helps
people
with
basic
tax
planning
and
resolve
tax
disputes.
He
is
also
sympathetic
to
people
with
large
student
loans.
He
can
be
reached
via
email
at [email protected].
Or
you
can
connect
with
him
on
Twitter
(
@stevenchung)
and
connect
with
him
on 
LinkedIn.

Included Health Launches Alternative Plan Design for Employers – MedCity News


Included
Health
,
a
navigation
and
virtual
care
company,
is
launching
into
the
insurance
space
with
its
alternative
plan
design
for
employers,
the
company

announced

last
week.

The
San
Francisco-based
company
provides
virtual
and
in-person
care,
navigation
and
care
coordination
and
24/7
support
for
clinical
and
administrative
needs.
The
new
alternative
plan
design
offers
a
“copay-first
plan,”
meaning
patients
know
what
care
is
going
to
cost
upfront.

The
plan
is
centered
around
primary
care.
It
starts
with
a
well-being
consult,
which
is
an
extended
primary
care
appointment
that
allows
members
to
ask
questions,
understand
their
benefits
and
form
a
relationship
with
the
provider.

“It’s
really
centered
on
that
clinician-patient
relationship,”
said
Dr.
Ami
Parekh,
chief
health
officer
at
Included
Health,
in
an
interview.
“We
want
it
to
be
trusted.
We
want
it
to
be
done
early
in
the
year,
so
that
every
single
person
has
a
care
plan.
They
know
what
they
can
expect
over
the
course
of
their
year.”

In
addition,
patients
receive
24/7
support
through
Included
Health’s
AI
assistant
named
Dot,
which
can
provide
answers
to
questions
and
hand
off
patients
to
human
support
if
needed.
Patients
can
be
connected
to
virtual
and
in-person
options
nationwide
for
a
variety
of
needs,
ranging
from
common
care
to
complex
care.

The
payment
model
for
the
alternative
plan
design
can
be
tailored
to
the
employer,
whether
that’s
a
per-member-per-month
fee
or
a
value-based
model,
according
to
Parekh.
Included
Health’s
plan
can
also
be
offered
as
an
option
alongside
another
traditional
health
plan.

The
company
has
already
launched
its
health
plan
with
one
employer,
which
the
company
declined
to
name.
About
20,000
employees
of
this
employer
are
enrolled
in
Included
Health’s
plan,
Parekh
said.
In
addition,
early
results
show
members
often
use
the
full
30-45
minutes
of
the
well-being
consults.

Included
Health
decided
to
launch
the
alternative
plan
design
due
to
a
need
they
were
hearing
from
employers.

“Both
members
and
employers
are
in
a
world
that’s
a
little
bit
stuck,”
Parekh
said.
“They
have
PPO
products
that
are
quite
expensive,
usually
have
a
lot
of
services
in
them,
but
are
hard
to
navigate.
Then
they
have
quite
restrictive
HMO
products,
and
they
actually
are
often
both
more
affordable
and
easier
to
navigate,
but
you
give
up
all
your
choice
to
be
able
to
have
that.

There
has
been,
I
would
say,
over
the
last
two
years,
a
desire
by
employers
to
have
something
that
is
ideally
the
best
of
both
worlds,
that
gives
members
choice,
but
is
easier
to
navigate.”

In
fact,
a
recent

survey

from
the
Business
Group
on
Health
found
that
17%
of
employers
have
adopted
an
alternative
health
plan,
while
7%
are
adding
it
in
2026
and
36%
are
considering
it
in
the
near
future.
Several
other
companies
also
offer
this,
including
Centivo
and
Imagine360.
What
sets
Included
Health
apart
is
the
size
of
its
clinical
team,
according
to
Parekh.
The
company
has
1,000
clinicians,
including
in
primary
care,
behavioral
health
and
urgent
care.

To
track
the
success
of
the
alternative
plan
design
over
time,
the
company
will
measure
engagement,
patient
adherence
to
their
care
plan
and
clinical
outcomes,
Parekh
added.


Photo:
Feodora
Chiosea,
Getty
Images

Morning Docket: 02.04.26 – Above the Law

*
Nonequity
partners
growing
increasingly
dissatisfied
just
because
equity
partners
have
invented
a
new
model
to
derail
their
colleagues’
careers
while
wringing
labor
out
of
them
without
sharing
profit.
Weird.
[American
Lawyer
]

*
Epstein
files
include
emails
accusing
Kathy
Ruemmler
of
having
an
affair
with
Epstein’s
personal
attorney.
[NY
Post
]

*
Elon
Musk
will
face
SEC
suit
over
Twitter
acquisition
actions.
[Law360]

*
Judge
isn’t
buying
Musk’s
claim
that
OpenAI
stole
trade
secrets.
At
least
from
Musk.
[Courthouse
News
Service
]

*
NY
creates
corps
of
official
legal
observers
to
monitor
ICE.
[Reuters]

*
EEOC
hired
lawyer
known
for
pushing
discrimination
against
men
claims
[The
Intercept
]

*
Sandra
Day
O’Connor
the
matchmaker.
[ABA
Journal
]